@Zetherin,
Zetherin wrote:First, assuming any text, regardless of it's affiliation, is valid or useful because of it's age is a true fallacy. Let us stop applying profound meaning to texts just because they are from notable prophets, preachers, or "God"(s). Sure, I may be able to find truth in many of the ancient texts, but I could also find some truth in Humpty Dumpty. So what?
I quite agree. By the same token, let's stop assuming that a text is not valid, useful or profound just because it's ancient. It's age is immaterial.
Quote:Consistent critical thinking does not lead to faith - it leads to further thought.
This is not the case. Critical thinking gives us faith in scientific theories for a start. In my case it gives me faith in the doctrine of mysticism. Indeed, I can hardly see any purpose to critical thinking unless we have some faith in our conclusions.
Quote:The minute you become stagnant, you have failed to consider something. People choose to become stagnant for comfort; frankly, it's very difficult to live in consistent critical thought - you are castrated from society, and have a high probability of dying alone in a log cabin like Nietzche.
You're assuming that critical thinking is always inconclusive. I do not believe this, and it is not my experience. Poor critical thinking is the problem, not critical thinking per se.
Quote:In terms of science, I completely disagree there is more 'sense' in ancient texts.
Yes, I realise this. But I don't think I suggested that there is always more sense in ancient texts. That would be a daft idea.
[quoute]As I've mentioned in other threads, knowledge is like a sculpture and shavings must fall in order to advance. Religion, I believe, is one of those shavings. And along with it, the arrogance of words like "good", "evil", miracle" "tragedy". We fit these words into our personal lives, inherently from our personal
desires. To then say there is an objective truth to any of these things is not only pretentious, but egotistic![/quote]
I agree that some modern religions could do with being stripped backed to their basics. I'd be all for doing this. But by saying that all religion is nonsense you do no more than reveal a lack of critical thinking and, it might be argued, an astonishing arrogance.
I'd be quite happy to defend my religious views on strictly philosophical grounds anytime you want to try to knock them down, but maybe in a new thread.