Joe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 12:04 pm
@Zetherin,
Zetherin wrote:
The thing I'm concerned with is attaching the stigma "God-given, good implication" to the word.

If you want to define said word along the lines of an anomaly, I'm more inclined to support you.


yeh i can understand that, Its like stacking assumptions onto each other.
Joe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 12:11 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
Whats a miracle? an observed demand from the faithful and answered by their god ? could someone please explain what the debate is about..


What I see going on here, is that a Miracle is an event that causes interest from humans based on personal perception and logic.

What I think going on in this thread is whether or not these events are magnified by our own reasons or they stand out because they justify a intelligence behind them, separate from our own.

God. It seems that people are using miracles to try and prove god exists. In a subtle way. But its there.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 01:02 pm
@Joe,
Joe wrote:
What I see going on here, is that a Miracle is an event that causes interest from humans based on personal perception and logic.

What I think going on in this thread is whether or not these events are magnified by our own reasons or they stand out because they justify a intelligence behind them, separate from our own.

God. It seems that people are using miracles to try and prove god exists. In a subtle way. But its there.
It begs the question is there or has there been a miracle to be discussed?..even if there has been one is it a showy thing that is more like a side show to the main event?
Joe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 01:11 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
It begs the question is there or has there been a miracle to be discussed?..even if there has been one is it a showy thing that is more like a side show to the main event?


No matter what it is, A "miracle", is a concept.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 01:18 pm
@Joe,
Joe wrote:
No matter what it is, A "miracle", is a concept.
Is that like concept car..plenty of promises but never materialises..
Joe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 01:30 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:
Is that like concept car..plenty of promises but never materialises..


well thats the interesting thing about a miracle. It is very material. Something happens and it is appreciated by someone. what we call this appreciation is unimportant. It is why we call this action, a title that separates its meaning. What meaning can justify if something is real? its very unprovable in my view. it falls to spirituality.

I feel like Freud now.
nameless
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 03:47 pm
@Joe,
Perhaps the notion/word 'miracle' evolved in a science/critical-thought 'lean' (and superstition/mythology rich) atmosphere. A 'Bic' lighter in action would certainly have qualified as a miracle at a particular place and time, to a particular 'world-view'.
Perhaps, in our critical thought/science 'rich' atmosphere of today, it's time to relegate the obsolete notion of 'miracles' to the dustbins of a superstitious and ignorant history?
There will be quite a pile of obsolete words, obsolete notions, to keep it company...
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 06:09 pm
@nameless,
nameless wrote:
Perhaps the notion/word 'miracle' evolved in a science/critical-thought 'lean' (and superstition/mythology rich) atmosphere. A 'Bic' lighter in action would certainly have qualified as a miracle at a particular place and time, to a particular 'world-view'.
Perhaps, in our critical thought/science 'rich' atmosphere of today, it's time to relegate the obsolete notion of 'miracles' to the dustbins of a superstitious and ignorant history?
There will be quite a pile of obsolete words, obsolete notions, to keep it company...


I reiterate what you just said in a multitude of my posts. It really astounds me why people still attach themselves to these simple-minded notions. I'd throw all of those obsolete notions in the proverbial wastebasket if possible, but alas, I do not have the power.

As another poster on this forum once said, "Knowledge is like a sculpture in progress, not a garbage heap; shavings must fall in order to advance.
Joe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 08:58 pm
@Zetherin,
Zetherin wrote:
I reiterate what you just said in a multitude of my posts. It really astounds me why people still attach themselves to these simple-minded notions. I'd throw all of those obsolete notions in the proverbial wastebasket if possible, but alas, I do not have the power.

As another poster on this forum once said, "Knowledge is like a sculpture in progress, not a garbage heap; shavings must fall in order to advance.


While I agree with your leveling of these notions, Id hafe to say that it would be out of personal perception to withdraw these ideas from the world. You cannot remove and idea. If your so inclined, it is only your conflict applied. People who use these words have a tendency to lean toward Faith.

I understand the stance against it, but to be so bold as to try and remove a persons faith..... well I think that would be just a step backwards.
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Mon 29 Dec, 2008 11:24 pm
@Joe,
Joe wrote:
While I agree with your leveling of these notions, Id hafe to say that it would be out of personal perception to withdraw these ideas from the world. You cannot remove and idea. If your so inclined, it is only your conflict applied. People who use these words have a tendency to lean toward Faith.

I understand the stance against it, but to be so bold as to try and remove a persons faith..... well I think that would be just a step backwards.


I never meant to make it appear I am capable of 'removing' an idea. My comment on throwing out the notions was jocular, however, I feel it is important to advance in thought. This requires critical thinking. As another before me stated, critical thinking and belief are diametrical opposites, the more of one, the less of the other.

Am I bold enough to try to remove a person's faith? Absolutely. But the key thing to remember here is that I do not have the power to do so, nor do I desire to have the power; to have the power would contradict my views on individual thought. With that said, I can compute enough around me to realize it's time to let some of these chippings fall; most of these notions are just retarded, retarded, and I mean that in every sense of the word. Millions of people lumbering around, mindlessly believing ancient doctrines written by decrepit old men. Most of this stuff a 12-year-old would believe, and yet it's controlling a good portion of the population. I mean, I'm not particularly intelligent, and I can even break down most of this **** within a few minutes of contemplation.

The best I can do is plant seeds of knowledge, and push for contemplation. I advocate critical thinking and frown upon stagnant, old, simple-minded concepts. Through a certain perspective, I understand I can be perceived as brash, unkind, even contradictory, but this is my desire. My desire is to see others intelligently come to their own conclusions. I advocate contemplation to the highest degree.
0 Replies
 
nameless
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 12:14 am
@Zetherin,
Zetherin;40083 wrote:
As another poster on this forum once said, "Knowledge is like a sculpture in progress, not a garbage heap; shavings must fall in order to advance.

Interesting inversely proportional direct relationship between the 'scrap heap' and the 'sculpture'. Can they be truly seperate? Disconnected? One cannot 'be' unless (and as) the 'other' One 'is', also!
I don't think that stuff can be truly discarded without getting rid of baby also, but, perhaps, a 'new' understanding, a new definition and context...

"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged; it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and time in which it is used." -Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 07:02 am
@nameless,
nameless wrote:
Interesting inversely proportional direct relationship between the 'scrap heap' and the 'sculpture'. Can they be truly seperate? Disconnected? One cannot 'be' unless (and as) the 'other' One 'is', also!
I don't think that stuff can be truly discarded without getting rid of baby also, but, perhaps, a 'new' understanding, a new definition and context...

"A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged; it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and time in which it is used." -Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.


You make a good point, and I'm actually discussing this with someone else currently. That is, we can't just throw all these obsolete notions in a proverbial wastebasket and call it a day; you can't undo an idea - the baby stands as you note.

I think the key to the analogy is that the shavings are part of the sculpture; the sculpture and the shavings both are. The shavings symbolize those ideas and notions that our species has simply little use for any longer, the new understanding is achieved with every thrust of the carver.

And I enjoy the Oliver quote. Thank you.
Whoever
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 08:10 am
@Victor Eremita,
Hi Zetherin

It seems to me that critical thinking is what leads to faith, unless, that is, one is happy to believe just about anything. And if a doctrine is ancient and survives it is probably because there is some truth in it. Indeed, most of those ancient doctrines you disparage advocate contemplation just as you do. Mohammed goes so far as to say that an hour's contemplation is worth a year's worship. I presume you'd go along with him on this.

I believe that critical thinking will lead us to conclude that there is more sense in many ancient doctrines than in many modern ones. At any rate, this is true in my case, and I predict that it will also be true in yours.
xris
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 08:22 am
@Joe,
Joe wrote:
well thats the interesting thing about a miracle. It is very material. Something happens and it is appreciated by someone. what we call this appreciation is unimportant. It is why we call this action, a title that separates its meaning. What meaning can justify if something is real? its very unprovable in my view. it falls to spirituality.

I feel like Freud now.
I think its crucial you consider what this appreciation is and if it helps fuel the delusions faith requires..
0 Replies
 
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 08:40 am
@Whoever,
Whoever wrote:
Hi Zetherin

It seems to me that critical thinking is what leads to faith, unless, that is, one is happy to believe just about anything. And if a doctrine is ancient and survives it is probably because there is some truth in it. Indeed, most of those ancient doctrines you disparage advocate contemplation just as you do. Mohammed goes so far as to say that an hour's contemplation is worth a year's worship. I presume you'd go along with him on this.

I believe that critical thinking will lead us to conclude that there is more sense in many ancient doctrines than in many modern ones. At any rate, this is true in my case, and I predict that it will also be true in yours.


First, assuming any text, regardless of it's affiliation, is valid or useful because of it's age is a true fallacy. Let us stop applying profound meaning to texts just because they are from notable prophets, preachers, or "God"(s). Sure, I may be able to find truth in many of the ancient texts, but I could also find some truth in Humpty Dumpty. So what?

Consistent critical thinking does not lead to faith - it leads to further thought. The minute you become stagnant, you have failed to consider something. People choose to become stagnant for comfort; frankly, it's very difficult to live in consistent critical thought - you are castrated from society, and have a high probability of dying alone in a log cabin like Nietzche.

In terms of science, I completely disagree there is more 'sense' in ancient texts. As I've mentioned in other threads, knowledge is like a sculpture and shavings must fall in order to advance. Religion, I believe, is one of those shavings. And along with it, the arrogance of words like "good", "evil", miracle" "tragedy". We fit these words into our personal lives, inherently from our personal desires. To then say there is an objective truth to any of these things is not only pretentious, but egotistic!
Whoever
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Dec, 2008 08:09 am
@Zetherin,
Zetherin wrote:
First, assuming any text, regardless of it's affiliation, is valid or useful because of it's age is a true fallacy. Let us stop applying profound meaning to texts just because they are from notable prophets, preachers, or "God"(s). Sure, I may be able to find truth in many of the ancient texts, but I could also find some truth in Humpty Dumpty. So what?

I quite agree. By the same token, let's stop assuming that a text is not valid, useful or profound just because it's ancient. It's age is immaterial.

Quote:
Consistent critical thinking does not lead to faith - it leads to further thought.

This is not the case. Critical thinking gives us faith in scientific theories for a start. In my case it gives me faith in the doctrine of mysticism. Indeed, I can hardly see any purpose to critical thinking unless we have some faith in our conclusions.

Quote:
The minute you become stagnant, you have failed to consider something. People choose to become stagnant for comfort; frankly, it's very difficult to live in consistent critical thought - you are castrated from society, and have a high probability of dying alone in a log cabin like Nietzche.

You're assuming that critical thinking is always inconclusive. I do not believe this, and it is not my experience. Poor critical thinking is the problem, not critical thinking per se.

Quote:
In terms of science, I completely disagree there is more 'sense' in ancient texts.

Yes, I realise this. But I don't think I suggested that there is always more sense in ancient texts. That would be a daft idea.

[quoute]As I've mentioned in other threads, knowledge is like a sculpture and shavings must fall in order to advance. Religion, I believe, is one of those shavings. And along with it, the arrogance of words like "good", "evil", miracle" "tragedy". We fit these words into our personal lives, inherently from our personal desires. To then say there is an objective truth to any of these things is not only pretentious, but egotistic![/quote]
I agree that some modern religions could do with being stripped backed to their basics. I'd be all for doing this. But by saying that all religion is nonsense you do no more than reveal a lack of critical thinking and, it might be argued, an astonishing arrogance.

I'd be quite happy to defend my religious views on strictly philosophical grounds anytime you want to try to knock them down, but maybe in a new thread.
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Dec, 2008 08:33 am
@Whoever,
Whoever wrote:
I quite agree. By the same token, let's stop assuming that a text is not valid, useful or profound just because it's ancient. It's age is immaterial.


This is not the case. Critical thinking gives us faith in scientific theories for a start. In my case it gives me faith in the doctrine of mysticism. Indeed, I can hardly see any purpose to critical thinking unless we have some faith in our conclusions.


You're assuming that critical thinking is always inconclusive. I do not believe this, and it is not my experience. Poor critical thinking is the problem, not critical thinking per se.


Yes, I realise this. But I don't think I suggested that there is always more sense in ancient texts. That would be a daft idea.

I'd be quite happy to defend my religious views on strictly philosophical grounds anytime you want to try to knock them down, but maybe in a new thread.


Religion, like any conclusion we come to, can hold value. However, there are some notions that, in my opinion, are just silly in this era. Civilization has been using the empty term "God" to not only excuse actions and maintain control, but also as a proverbial wastebasket for things we do not understand. Centuries before, we would think the Sun God was providing us heat, and now we've learned of thermodynamics. Centuries before, we left it up to the agriculture God to give us a good yield, and now we've advanced in vegetative genetic manipulation. The more we've logically (and often scientifically) learned about the world around us, the less we have left up to "God". It only begs the question: "How will the general population view "God" in the future?". It's an everchanging, exponentially elusive concept that we've been clinging onto in order to apply meaning to our existence. To me, that's arrogant - why do we believe we are special just because we have a more developed frontal lobe? It perplexes me.

Consistent critical thought is not realistic, because, as you note, there comes a time when a conclusion must be drawn and thereby a shred of faith must be held. I see now how I made it seem I was preaching that I transcend it all; I do not. I have faith in things, just as everyone else does - it's impossible not to (and, of course, I'm not even speaking about anything religious). However, I do critically think as often as my mental health allows me to, constantly considering the world around me, reevaluating my morals, beliefs, and desires. With that said, I think we're on the same page.

Now, as for your religious views, I'd be curious to hear them. Direct me to a thread and I'm there. I believe in considering everything, and am always willing to give someone a listen. Even if I don't agree with your conclusions, I will try my best to not "knock you down", but rather offer my own logical progression.

Thanks.
Whoever
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Dec, 2008 01:59 pm
@Zetherin,
Zetherin - What an excellent post. I completely understand where you're coming from, I used to hold exactly the same view, and I see that you're not being unfair but justifiably sceptical. But there is more to religion than the kind of dogmatic monotheism you so dislike, as I discovered to my surprise a few years ago. I'm a bit rushed now but will start a thread when I get my thoughts together.
nameless
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Dec, 2008 02:23 pm
@Zetherin,
Zetherin;40145 wrote:
The shavings symbolize those ideas and notions that our species has simply little use for any longer, the new understanding is achieved with every thrust of the carver.

On the other hand, I have been an artist/ blacksmith for many decades, and I have taken metalic 'scraps', the 'waste pile of othewrs' and transformed them into 'other' (more useful) things! Transformation!!

Quote:
And I enjoy the Oliver quote. Thank you.

Welcome!
Zetherin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 31 Dec, 2008 02:42 pm
@nameless,
nameless wrote:
On the other hand, I have been an artist/ blacksmith for many decades, and I have taken metalic 'scraps', the 'waste pile of othewrs' and transformed them into 'other' (more useful) things! Transformation!!


There you go, you're just hitting home with the analogies today. :bigsmile:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Miracles
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 12:07:23