@iconoclast,
iconoclast wrote:Thanks for your reply no-one - but I think it fair to wait upon the author of the line I quoted to offer his reply.
That said: If God can
If I understand you correctly, the third option: 'none of the above' is not an option.
Why would any god of such, bind it's self by what it has binded it's creation's by?
So would humanity even know the choice's of that god, if man cannot understand the choice's of somthing that is not bound by what man is bound by...
Hence If you where that god would you bind your self to the duality of to choose or not to choose, or would you see the importance of making your own that is not of that duality, or somthing that is beyond the concept of duality?
In my opinion, it's arrogant of humanity for trying to attempt to understand what cannot be understood within the the existence that humanity dwel's within...
(Yes god's 3rd option is not an option, for it is somthing that is beyond the understanding of man, for it could be somthing that cannot be portrayed by humanity in any way, shape, or form, or it could be somthing that can.)
For we all live within a Finite existence... for we are bound by that fact...
