@Theaetetus,
Faun147 wrote:Does the scientification and quantification of everything in the 20th/21st century come at the cost of intuition?
I was thinking that one factor could be the pricing of things. Rather than having an intuitive understanding of value, we have "$20.00."
Also, could the increasing demand for precision cause an intolerance to ambiguity?
Finally, what could this mean about art and creativity?
Does the scientification[sic] and quantification of everything in the 20/21st century at the cost of intuition? I don't think so. Superficially it may seem like intuition is being displaced by "hardcore science," but put the advances of the 20/21st centuries and juxtapose with what could possibly be advances in the 22/23rd centuries and people in the future will say what scientific cavemen we were. So to me, this seems a little relative. But look at the word "intuition." If intuition is defined as "a looking at, consideration" (OED) from the Greek
noumenonthing. The Solonic-era Greeks for example gauged wealth based on how your wealth translated into bushels of wheat (i.e. "500 bushel men," Hippies, Zeugetai, Thetes, etc.). Are we any different? Is the value of an Athenian's wealth any different than yours or my wealth today? Look at the current financial crisis. There are
billions of dollars being pumped into the system that are worth something yet were "conjured" from nothing. Is a dollar still worth a dollar even though it does not exist in some corporeal form? On that note, given the nature of the dollar and "out-of-the-air" currency, does cash really hold
empirical value now as the underline value is essentially perceived? Don't we need intuition now to grasp the
true value of the dollar above and beyond the original concept of a
currency note?