@Doorsopen,
If one looks at western religions, one can see a conscious rejection of science and knowledge as the understanding of God through reason for the notion that one can only approach God through uncritical faith rejecting all reason. And, given enough time, and if there were any money in it I would bet that I could produce statements from some of the most influential philosophers of the various faiths stating to this effect, that the good must control the strong, and the few must control the many if society is not to return to brutality. Now, how one would interperate such terms as good, and define the few who should control society might reasonably be an issue. Yet, because as educated, and educators these philosphers showed no doubt as to who were the good, and who comprised the few who should rule. It puts me to mind of the language of the sanhedron, at the trial of Jesus, where the chief priest said: better that one should die than many, my paraphrase. And even though the Christians themselves use this to justify the sacrifice of Jesus to save many souls, it is in the end a very expediant conclusion that the sacrifice of another individual to save your self from a revolution that might reveal to all your equality, your vanity, and your human failings -is justified. Religions cover their asses. They take care of their power structure first. The eternal plays no part in the majority of their beliefs, as the form of social relationship does. It is like the Christians saying there is only one path to salvation when Jesus took every path and every tack to reach people.
And, I would differ with you as to the point of ritual, as ritual is far older than modern religons. I would say that for primitives it was a way of driving reality forward through a cycle that is not always clear. Some people thought of a human sacrifice as a door to a day, and that a file of human sacrifices could give a people a lifetime. In some creation myths the world was begun with a sacrifice, and sacrifice has always, universally been the price of membership in any relationship or community. And, ritual recreates a certain mood, and order of events. In the Catholic mass, one hears the word of Jesus in the Gospels, and makes a sacrifice of goods before sharing the last supper, and being made an apostle sent to preach the word, and live the Christian life. It is no imitation. You are there. It is not Hocus Pocus, but Hoc es Corpus: this is the body (of Christ).
I resent the hypocisy of my faith even if I am blind to my own. I resent that they attack the fundamental dsicoveries of science, and yet use science, in the form of the computer to do so, and will run to the doctor like the rest of us heathens when sick. Do they not hang on to their wealth while infants perish? Don't they waste their love in political organizations to make laws that curb only freedom when it is by freedom that people are saved? Do they not spend all they possess to buy another moment of life when they say they believe they are saved. Is it not all about control of the beast in mankind, that they do so much to feed and to goad? If Christianity were the answer there would be no question. Instead, they must advertize to fill their benches. Why? Should it not be the truth that draws people to it. Shouldn't the church be in two worn shoes going always where people need, and pray for the help of God? As long as religion is about power, the powerful will be supported by the church, and the church will be supported by the powerful.