I have not been very fortunate in the sources i have been able to find, and that can undoubtedly be attributed to my not being terribly clever about searching for material. Here is a sampling of the things i have been finding, though:
From the
Japan Times, an article on a study of the history of bluefin tuna fishing in coastal and inland sea waters:
Quote:Based on his studies, he believes the bluefin catch soared from 1,000 tons to 5,000 tons in the 1910s to almost 20,000 tons in the 1930s.
He attributed the sharp rise to the emergence of fishing vessels equipped with engines that allowed fishermen to expand their range.
Muto said that considering the extensive fishing off Kushiro in eastern Hokkaido and coastal areas in the 1930s, he assumed the bluefin haul could have gone up to 25,000 tons during the peak period.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20080418f4.html
(Please note that all of Dr. Muto's references are to coastal and inland sea fisheries in the Japanese archipelago, as opposed to commercial pelagic fishing elsewhere in the Pacific, or in the Atlantic, Indian or Southern oceans, or the Gulf of Mexico and Mediterranean.)
I do believe, though, that this shows the dramatic increase in the exploitation of wild fish sources--from 1000 tons a year a century ago, to 25,000 tons in the period after the cod war between China and Japan in the 1930s. Several sources i have encountered state that China's importation of seafood now exceeds that of Japan. I'm not simply "picking on" Japan, i'm just using them as exemplary of the increased use of wild fish sources, with the concomitant decline of wild fish stocks--many nearing collapse.
**************************************************
This passage from an FAO-dot-org page shows evidence of the Japanese increasing their pelagic fishing activities outside home waters after the Second World War--i have included below a passage on their expansion of the whaling activities, too. I suggest that not simply Japan, but many nations began to dramatically increase their exploitation of wild fish sources in the period since the end of that war.
Quote:Tuna fishing activity in post WW II in Micronesia was remarkably different. Much of the fishery infrastructure and tuna vessels were destroyed by war activity and the Japanese and Okinawan fishermen had been repatriated. Under a United Nations trustee arrangement, the United States assumed control of the area, but had much less interest than Japan did previously in economic development, including fisheries. As part of the terms of surrender, geographic restrictions known as MacArthur Lines, were placed on the movements of Japanese vessels, which effectively prevented their tuna fishing in Micronesia. These lines were extended four times and finally the last MacArthur Line was lifted in April 1952, at which time the Japanese government began encouraging the construction of large longline and pole-and-line tuna vessels (Peatie, 1988; Matsuda, 1987). Nine Japanese longline/mothership expeditions took place in Micronesia in 1950 and 1951 under temporary permission of the USA military (Felando, 1987). Although Japanese fishing activity in what were then high seas areas gradually returned to the Micronesian region, USA government restrictions on economic activity ashore were held in place until the mid-1970s and precluded any return to the fish processing bases developed before the War.
In the early 1950s the activities of the Japan-based pole-and-line vessels were limited to fishing close to Japan by their need to carry live bait, but later improvements in technology allowed those vessels to increase their range from their Japanese bases. By the early 1960s Japanese pole and line vessels were fishing in the areas near the northern Marianas and Palau during their near-Japan off-season (Rothschild and Uchida, 1968; Skipjack Programme, 1984) and during the next ten years were fishing well south of the equator. Longline vessels also expanded their range; in 1952 their fishing area included most of Micronesia and by 1962 most parts of the Pacific between 40o north and south latitude [note: i have no idea what the author means by this cryptic reference to what one can only assume was, for the author, a reference to latitude.] had been explored by Japanese longline fishermen (Matsuda, 1987). Significant American tuna initiatives were also under way. (This paragraph was completed with a description of American expansion into Pacific tuna grounds).
The Japanese were also active in establishing facilities in the Pacific Islands area. Between the early 1950s and the early 1960s, tuna longline bases were established in Pago Pago (American Samoa), Santo Island (Vanuatu), Noumea (New Caledonia), Papeete (French Polynesia) and Levuka (Fiji). In most cases these facilities supplied raw product, mainly albacore, to canneries in Hawaii and the USA mainland (Doulman, 1987). At the same time, the Japan-based pole-and-line vessels continued to expand their range, with fishing operations eventually reaching even the southern parts of the Pacific Islands area, with 300 pole-and-line vessels participating seasonally in the fishery.
http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ai001e/ai001e05.htm
***************************************************
This passage from a Wikipedia article is offered to show the growth of the Japanese whaling industry after the war.
Quote:General Douglas MacArthur encouraged the surrendered Japan to continue whaling in order to provide a cheap source of meat to starving people (and millions of dollars in oil for the USA and Europe).[29] The Japanese whaling industry quickly recovered as MacArthur authorized two tankers, converted into factory ships (Hashidate Maru and Nisshin Maru), with catcher boats to once again, take blue whales, fins, humpbacks and sperm whales in the Antarctic and elsewhere.[30]
The first post-war expedition was overseen by a US naval officer, Lieutenant David McCracken, and observed by Australian Kenneth Coonan. Coonan expressed disapproval of McCracken in his reports of violated regulations and waste dumped over the side when the fleet began killing whales faster than they could be processed. McCracken even briefly joined in whaling with the Japanese crew of a catch boat and detailed the trip in his 1948 book, Four Months on a Jap Whaler.[31]
The post-war recovery established whale meat as a nation-wide food source for the first time. In 1947 whale meat made up over 50 percent of the meat consumed in Japan. The market significantly increased through commercial sale and public distribution. In 1954, the School Lunch Act also included whale meat in compulsory education (elementary and middle school) to improve the nutrition of Japanese children. However, as economic growth and average income improved, the demand for whale decreased. Other meats became more popular into the 1970s and whale meat was removed from school menus.[32]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_Japan#World_War_II
(I have left the numbers of the notes in the quote of the article, so that anyone visiting the Wikipedia page can quickly find the references which have been cited. The contents of this article are disputed. I have perused the Discussion page (often referred to at Wikipedia as "the Talk page," and do not find any disputes about the portion of the text i have quoted.)
************************************************
This brief passage from the New Zealand fisheries ministry is simply offered as more evidence of the expansion of the Japanese pelagic fishing industry after the Second World War:
Quote:Japanese fishing boats first start to appear off New Zealand's waters in the late 1950s. Their presence, and the UK setting up a 12 mile limit in 1964, become the catalyst for an extended NZ fishing zone as large quantities of fish are caught by Japan's fishing fleet. The Territorial Sea and Fishing Zone Act 1965 extends New Zealand’s jurisdiction from 3 to 12 miles and empowers MAF to regulate foreign vessels entering the 12 mile zone.
From the New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries.
**********************************************************
In another thread, i commented that the consumption of one half pound of seafood per day per capita in Japan is obscene. Since the time, i have seen sources which were too brief to quote here, which put that figure at half that amount, or even as low as 3 ounces per capita per day. However, in a nation of 127,000,000, three ounces per capita per day of processed fish is still an enormous quantity. Coupled with the fact that the Japanese also eat the production of domestic livestock, and import beef, it is an amazing amount of animal protein being consumed by them annually. I suspect the same could be said of the United States.
What i have offered above is to show the increase in the exploitation of pelagic fish sources by the Japanese in relatively recent times, within a century or less. It might be possible to show the same increase in the exploitation of these sources by other nations. If one does not wish to call it cultural, it still cannot be ignored that nations have chosen to exploit this resource, and i don't see any compelling evidence provided here that this is the only source nations may turn to.