How did the World Trade Center collapse?

@glitterbag,

Just deal with the science, the evidence and the facts, glitter.

...

Sorry, I am just pulling your old leg, glitterbag.

You have always shown that science, evidence and facts are anathema to you. How does a body go thru life like that? What a wasted existence!!

How did 19 Arab hijackers manage to get enough US proprietary nanothermite to blow up three towers?

Quote:

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2
, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4
, Frank M. Legge5
,
Daniel Farnsworth2
, Gregg Roberts6
, James R. Gourley7
and Bradley R. Larsen3
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3
S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
4
9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5
Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7
International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA
Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the
destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in
this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan
resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.

The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy
dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately
100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures.

Separation
of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum
are intimately mixed in the red material.

When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring
at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich
spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these
chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

Did you watch the video, glitterbag?

Can you explain how UA175's nosecone made it thru two walls of 14" steel box columns [I'll explain what they are to you later] the steel floor trusses/reinforced concrete floors [same thing] the core columns [same thing'] and emerge whole, unscathed, in perfect shape?

Or is it something else, like the nose cone of a missile? Did the hijackers bring that in checked or carry on baggage?

1 Reply

@camlok,

I can but that would be a betrayal of my fellow government cronies who conspire to enslave the American Sheeple. You have to stop warning the sheeple, the sheeple hate the folks who are smarter than they are.

2 Replies

@glitterbag,

Quote:

I can ...

You have never been able to post anything wherein you were able to discuss or explain anything.

Even your attempts at humor are really lame.

This is as good as you get.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

We both know why you are afraid, glitterbag, and I fully understand your predicament but don't you think it is very unadultlike to not face up to reality?

The only thing you have to fear is the truth, but isn't the truth what is most important?

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

Can you provide solid evidence of the molten steel?
There is none. There is only anecdotal evidence that is unsupported by any actual evidence.

This, above, from parados, is a dandy example of how easily US government official conspiracy theorists will lie. The evidence for molten/vaporized WTC structural steel is voluminous.

https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-8452/403_apc.pdf

US government conspiracy theorists/supporters of the USGOCT have always been liars of immense proportions or people woefully ignorant of the facts and the science of 9/11.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

Quote:

Can’t pull the wool over your eyes, can they Zeke???

No, they can't, glitterbag, but they sure can do that to you and all the other gullible ones.

Did you notice the nosecone of the "missile"? Freeze/stop the video at about seven seconds and then walk it forward by clicking on the time band without restarting the video. At about 9 seconds the full "missile" is exposed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o

What is it? It can't be the nose of the 767-222 UA175, the plane alleged to have hit WTC2.

1 Reply

NIST's Shyam Shylock Sunder said of WTC7:

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."

So instead of looking at all the evidence of explosives, the molten/vaporized WTC steel, the free fall of WTC7, the videos of explosions, the reports of numerous eyewitnesses, reporters, ... of those explosions, the seismic record that shows explosions, NIST picked a completely wacky theory, their "an extraordinary event" that had never ever occurred before in the history of steel framed high rises.

Then NIST lied about more than ten things that were on the construction/engineering drawings for WTC7, saying they weren't there, things that would have prevented their nonsense theory from happening.

Guess what? NIST's nonsense theory about Column 79 never did happen because WTC7 fell at free fall acceleration for its first 2.25 seconds, 105 feet, 8 storeys.

That means that there was a controlled demolition in the lower floors that allowed it to free fall. THERE IS NO OTHER MECHANISM KNOW TO MAN THAT CAN CAUSE FREE FALL EXCEPT A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION!

The molten/vaporized WTC7 steel confirms this CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.

Both of these things describe, unequivocally, that there were no Muslim hijackers on 9/11, because the same scenario occurred in WTCs 1 & 2. The molten/vaporized WTCs 1 & 2 steel and the obvious controlled demolition, which is also backed by the seismic record.

0 Replies

@camlok,

camlok wrote:

Quote:
Can’t pull the wool over your eyes, can they Zeke???

No, they can't, glitterbag, but they sure can do that to you and all the other gullible ones.

Did you notice the nosecone of the "missile"? Freeze/stop the video at about seven seconds and then walk it forward by clicking on the time band without restarting the video. At about 9 seconds the full "missile" is exposed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpEct4q4z9o

What is it? It can't be the nose of the 767-222 UA175, the plane alleged to have hit WTC2.

thank God you are so smart. And thank you for saving humanity...well at least the humanity thats worthwhile according to you. Hallelujah, we can relax, camlok will take charge and cure all the ills of the corrupt American Sheeple. But here's a warning, once you take charge, you will be responsible for all the sins.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

Quote:

thank God you are so smart.

Why do you persist in your denials, glitterbag? They are not rational.

What was the nose cone that exited WTC2? I trust you were able to watch a whole six to eight seconds without tiring your mind.

How did Arab hijackers melt/vaporize WTC structural steel?

Do you know that 6,952 soldiers have died since the US governments' lies about 9/11, since that day that 2,996 westerners were murdered by the US government, that millions of dark skinned people have been murdered by the same US governments' since that day.

Why on earth do you support this carnage, these lies, this massive suffering? Would you like it if some of those deaths were your kith and kin? If your grand kids had their appendages blown off?

How did Arab hijackers obtain US government proprietary nanothermite?

Did you know that these new nano scale explosives, being a new generation of super explosives can go thru 11 feet of high strength armor steel, after traveling several meters thru the air at a speed of 10 kilometers per second?

WTC structural steel didn't stand a chance!!

0 Replies

The following was moved from Why do people deny evolution? Post # Post: # 6,713,999 of the following page,

https://able2know.org/topic/229102-497#top

Quote:

Monterey Jack: As far as I can tell from your posts, you are accusing peop;le of not accepting science and not relly be scientists when they reject the 9/11 truther conspiracy theory that 9/11 had nothing to do with Islamic terrorists flying planes into the WTC but was in fact a fslse flag operation, and they adduce "science" so-called to support that wacko belief. If you rejin fact a false flag operation nd the WTC were leveled by bombs planted thefre. they torture facts to try to fit into their theory, neglecting the fact that within days of the events calculations showed that several hundred ton planes laden with jet fuel flying well above stall speed and crashing into new and untested monocoque construction skyscrapers at several hundred miles an hour and being stopped short in a hundred feet or so, created a HUGE conversion of kinecti energy into friction and thermal energy and would have generated heat and contained energy in a small space fully caplabe of causing the weakening over a few minutes of the support structure and its subsequeny cokllapse. You guys are the ones with the goofball science, not the farmermans of the world..

1 Reply

@camlok,

Quote:

Monterey Jack: As far as I can tell from your posts, you are accusing peop;le of not accepting science and not relly be scientists ...

That is true. Any reading of any and all of farmerman's posts on this subject will reveal that my accusations are completely justified, farmerman never posted any science or any facts or evidence.

Quote:

MJ: when they reject the 9/11 truther conspiracy theory that 9/11 had nothing to do with Islamic terrorists flying planes into the WTC but was in fact a fslse flag operation, and they adduce "science" so-called to support that wacko belief.

You lie here too, Jack. The conspiracy theorists are the people who believe in the US government conspiracy theory. There is no evidence, none whatsoever to support it. I have asked many people, many times to provide evidence for the USGOCT and none has ever been put forward.

That ought to tell you all you need to know, Jack.

Over 3,000 science professionals have studied this extensively and their conclusions are all the same, the three towers were brought down by controlled demolitions. The science and the evidence for this are crystal clear.

Just a few examples:

One: US government proprietary nanothermite was discovered in WTC dust in large volumes. Nanothermite was discovered by US military scientists in the 1990s. No one else in the world has this super explosive, no one else knows how to make it.

You can grasp, I hope, that this "new generation of super explosives" wasn't made in caves in Afghanistan, transported in carry on luggage and tossed all over the twin towers AND WTC7 to bring all three towers in a manner that defies Newton's Laws.

Two: The by products of these nanothermite reactions were also found in large volumes in WTC dust. They were found by many independent scientists, RJLee Group of forensic engineers who were hired by Deutsche Bank, the USGS.

Three: This nanothermite can explain the molten/vaporized WTC structural steel. Alleged hijackers with jet fuel and office furnishings cannot [as in impossible have melted/vaporized WTC structural steel.

farmerman the scientist would never ever address these facts, he never would address the science. His was a plan of obfuscation which is hardly the mark of a scientist.

These three facts, above, are all anyone even needs to know that the US government conspiracy theory is completely false. These three things, by themselves, confirm that there were no Arab hijackers.

0 Replies

more videos:
https://www.unz.com/article/911-was-an-israeli-job/

0 Replies

How did the World Trade Center collapse?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know