Good god the iPad is a steaming pile of disappointment

Most people don't like it when they are forced to accept a product which gives them less control, thanks to other people's preferences. I guess you are immune to such feelings.

But I must protest one point! Data hosted by someone else is by definition removed from your control in a variety of ways. You can have access to it cut off unexpectedly over a variety of issues which may or may not be valid ones, or may be technical in nature. Like a lot of things I think this is an idea which sounds great UNTIL something goes wrong.

A combination of the two is likely the way to go - you might even consider it to be local backups of remotely stored data if you like.

True cloud computing envisions hardware being a commodity, and an application runs wherever it can find the cheapest hardware.

But this is an example which supports my point: because of the popularity of the automatic transmission (which is easier to use but offers less overall control of the machine) it is now more expensive and harder to get the device which experienced (we call 'em 'power' users) prefer. And I doubt this is a situation which these users are happy about, just as I am unhappy about the way computers are headed.

Cycloptichorn

25 things vanishing in America, part 2: The stick shift
Jennie L. Phipps
Apr 5th 2009 at 7:00AM
Text SizeAAA

Filed under: Transportation

I've always thought automatic transmissions were for wimps, but that's me driving the Dodge Dakota with an automatic tranny. Not because I can't tell the difference between a gas pedal and a clutch, but because makers of trucks -- both foreign and domestic -- have given up on the notion of sticks.

It's hard to find a manual transmission these days. In 1980, J.D. Powers and Associates estimates that more than 35% of all cars sold had a stick shift. By 2005, that number had dropped to 6%. Four years later, finding a car with a manual transmission is a big challenge -- you have to go either high end or very low end. 2008 was the last year that any manufacturer of full-size trucks offered a manual transmission. The 2008 Dodge Ram was the last to make manual an option. In 2009, the macho truck propelled by a driver with skill has gone the way of the buggy whip.

I reared three boys and I made them learn how to drive on a car with a manual transmission. I thought men ought to know how to do that. It put them behind the curve in driver's ed, but in the long run " after they finally mastered lifting the clutch and goosing the gas simultaneously -- they thanked me. When my oldest drove his manual-transmission Camaro to college, it looked like a perfect car to borrow " until the mooches figured out that it was a stick shift and knew they couldn't drive it. That got my son off the hook gracefully lots of times.

It used to be that manual transmissions were lighter, more reliable, easier on gas. Today, that's not necessarily true, according to this report from Progressive insurance, which favors automatics and says they get slightly better gas mileage than their manual cousins.

The latest thing in transmissions is the automated manual transmission with paddle shifters. In cars with paddle shifters, there are two "paddles" mounted on the back side of the steering wheel. One is for upshifting, the other, downshifting. The paddles shift the transmission electronically rather than relying on a mechanical connection like a stick shift. No clutch necessary. But drivers do get a sense of control.

Manufacturers of the finest sports cars in the world, including Porsche, offer paddle shifts and some drivers love them, including Formula One racers for whom they were first developed.

It seems funny to me that cars equipped with manual shifts should cost more, and I'm reluctant to shell out for something that doesn't seem like it should be a luxury. Still, I miss driving a manual shift. Using both your feet and your hands focuses your attention on driving. You have to concentrate and that makes the trip more interesting.

There have been a number of complaints that updating older devices to the newer OS version causes performance degradation.

It pisses me off that they want me to pay $10 every time a new version of the OS comes out - and they then require all new apps to conform to the new version of the OS, even new versions of apps you've already bought! I'll be damned if I'll pay another $10 to upgrade the OS....