20
   

Has England really become this ridiculous?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 07:32 am

That is how Archduke Franz Ferdinand Hapsburg was assassinated in 1914:
Princip shot him from a short distance, as he was riding in a car.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 09:10 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Members of the Black Hand secret society assassinated king Alexander I of Serbia, too. Why do you connect this to the English Fire Arms Act?

(The dynasty is called 'Habsburg', by the way, named after the first counts of Habsburg, from Habsburg Castle/[now) Switzerland, since the 11th century (Count Radbot of Habsburg) until today (Karl Habsburg-Lothringen).
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 11:08 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Members of the Black Hand secret society assassinated king Alexander I of Serbia, too.
Why do you connect this to the English Fire Arms Act?
(The dynasty is called 'Habsburg', by the way, named after the first counts of Habsburg, from Habsburg Castle/[now) Switzerland, since the 11th century (Count Radbot of Habsburg) until today (Karl Habsburg-Lothringen).
I do not; I just reflected on the Archduke and myself
being victims of guys shooting at us while we are in cars.

I abjectly apologize for the spelling error.

At least, in my case, it did not result in beginning a world war.
Surely, u will admit that.





David
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 11:25 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

At least, in my case, it did not result in beginning a world war.
Surely, u will admit that.

David


Not as far as I am aware NOW.

With this restriction I can admit it.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 11:38 am
One more possibly related story. This one is about the police in Surrey.
Quote:
Top cops suspended over alleged dishonest conduct
(ThisIsSurreyToday.com, May 22, 2009)

Two top cops have been suspended for alleged dishonest conduct regarding speeding penalties.

Surrey Police chief superintendent Adrian Harper, the divisional commander for East Surrey division, was suspended, today, (Friday May 22), for alleged dishonest conduct regarding the avoidance of speeding penalties.

West Surrey division's superintendent Johnny Johncox has also been suspended for the same reason.

The suspensions are as a result of a review carried out by Surrey Police Professional Standards Department.

The review looked into the granting of exemptions to police officers and staff for speeding and red traffic signal offences.


Surrey Police said that while the vast majority of exemptions were granted for sound operational reasons, the review raised concerns about the exemption applications and approvals within the Force for a very limited number of cases.

Surrey Police made a referral to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which is now managing the investigation.

The IPCC has approved a file being sent to the Crown Prosecution Service for a decision in relation to prosecution.


Here are links to all three related news stories:

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/news/Ex-soldier-faces-jail-handing-gun/article-1509082-detail/article.html

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/ashtead/cops-suspended-alleged-dishonest-conduct/article-1016771-detail/article.html

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/golf/Man-accused-attacking-DVLA-inspector-broom-walks-free/article-361380-detail/article.html

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 11:59 am
@wandeljw,
ThisIsSurrey has a long record of critisisng some policemen/-women in the county's forces: the publisher (it is said) favoured some others for these posts ...

But: until now, there's no other report about this 'gunn-trial' than the here quoted.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 12:09 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Forgot to mention that these four free papers (online: thisissurrey.com) are owned by The Daily Mail's publishing company (see here).
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 12:17 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

ThisIsSurrey has a long record of critisisng some policemen/-women in the county's forces: the publisher (it is said) favoured some others for these posts ...

But: until now, there's no other report about this 'gunn-trial' than the here quoted.


On the webpage for the most recent story, ThisIsSurrey shows:
Comments on this story have been disabled for legal reasons
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 01:30 pm

Is the farmer, Tony Martin free yet ?
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 02:03 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:


Is the farmer, Tony Martin free yet ?


You mean the man who manslaughtered one man and wounded another?
He was released in 2003, after serving (the maximum) three years of his five years sentence.
He's now (again) working with the British Neo-Nazi party BNP (and wanted to become a MP for them - which is impossible due to his conviction for manslaughter).
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 02:26 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


Is the farmer, Tony Martin free yet ?


You mean the man who manslaughtered one man and wounded another?
He was released in 2003, after serving (the maximum) three years of his five years sentence.
He's now (again) working with the British Neo-Nazi party BNP (and wanted to become a MP for them -
which is impossible due to his conviction for manslaughter).
As an anti-authoritarian person,
I do not approve of anyone supporting any form of socialism,
including national socialism, but I can understand his shock and revulsion
at the English abuse of his rights, incarcerating him for defense of his property.
I wish he 'd chosen to join a libertarian party.
I have no information of whether any exists in England.

Thanks for the information, Walter.



David
wandeljw
 
  2  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 02:27 pm
The UK Home Office has a firearms guidance booklet for police officials:
http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/operational-policing/HO-Firearms-Guidance.pdf?view=Binary

From page 129 of this booklet:
Quote:
Anyone surrendering an illegally held firearm should be questioned discreetly with a view to establishing its history but, unless circumstances exist to give serious cause for concern as to its provenance (for example, if it appears to have been stolen), the person handing it in should not be pressed.

The emphasis should be on creating an environment in which people hand in illegally held firearms.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 02:29 pm

All joking aside, Tony Martin made England a safer place.
His fellow subjects have reason to THANK him.
He shoud be hail fellow, well met.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 02:46 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wish he 'd chosen to join a libertarian party.
I have no information of whether any exists in England.



Leaving aside that the BNP might be all and everything but never a Socialist party - the Liberal Democrats are the main libertarian party in the UK (63 Lib Dem Members of Parliament). [The Liberal Democratic Party was formed in the 80's by a merger of the Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party.]
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 03:01 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I wish he 'd chosen to join a libertarian party.
I have no information of whether any exists in England.



Leaving aside that the BNP might be all and everything but never a Socialist party - the Liberal Democrats are the main libertarian party in the UK (63 Lib Dem Members of Parliament). [The Liberal Democratic Party was formed in the 80's by a merger of the Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party.]
Thank u for that information.
I hope that we are using the same definition of "libertarian".

What is the Liberal Democrats' position qua England 's weapons laws?

Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 03:14 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I hope that we are using the same definition of "libertarian".

What is the Liberal Democrats' position qua England 's weapons laws?



Well, they are the UK's (aside the NI Alliance Party) members of the EU's European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party and the Liberal International, the liberal ('libertarian') party organisations.

I suppose there's no party besides the extremists in all Europe who share your ideas od "free weapons", David.
But I'm not sure what the official view of the LibDems is.


Oh, and there's really a 'Libertarian Party' in the UK, with less than 300 members, though ...
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Nov, 2009 07:10 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I hope that we are using the same definition of "libertarian".

What is the Liberal Democrats' position qua England 's weapons laws?



Well, they are the UK's (aside the NI Alliance Party) members of the EU's European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party and the Liberal International, the liberal ('libertarian') party organisations.

I suppose there's no party besides the extremists in all Europe who share your ideas od "free weapons", David.
But I'm not sure what the official view of the LibDems is.


Oh, and there's really a 'Libertarian Party' in the UK, with less than 300 members, though ...
Actually, Walter, I have not decided
whether I shoud support "free weapons" (for the poor, presumably?)

As of now, subject to re-consideration,
I believe that everyone shoud pay for his own weapons.





David
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Nov, 2009 12:23 pm
Quote:
Celebs show support for ex-soldier's case
(ThisIsSurreyToday.com, November 19, 2009)

An ex-soldier is "overwhelmed" by the frenzy of public support generated by a Surrey Mirror story.

Last week, we reported how Paul Clarke is facing a minimum of five years imprisonment after finding a discarded shotgun and handing it into police.

The 27-year-old from Merstham found the sawn-off shotgun in March this year, handed it in to Reigate police station, where he was arrested immediately.

On November 10, a jury at Guildford Crown Court found him guilty of possessing a firearm " he is now facing a minimum of five years behind bars.

Since the story broke it has caused outrage across the world " and whipped up a frenzy of online debate and support.

Mr Clarke, who spent two years serving in the armoured military in Donchester, said: "It's been mad. I feel like a celebrity. I just want to thank everyone for all their support."

Over the weekend, Mr Clarke's court case was one of the most commented stories on social networking site 'Twitter' " getting more mention than 'Jedward' the controversial X-Factor contestants.

His case caught the attention of several celebrities, including comedians David Mitchell and Simon Pegg, star of 'Shaun of the Dead' and 'How to Lose Friends and Alienate People'.

And, Graham Lineham, creator of the hit TV sit-com Father Ted 'tweeted' in response to other comments on the story.

He wrote: "There'll be enough interest in Paul Clarke now [to] at least shed a little light on [the] situation. Wait for that before pitchforks/petitions".

Bloggers across the world have fiercely debated the 'strict liability' aspect of the law on which Mr Clarke was convicted " where the intention of anybody possessing a firearm is irrelevant.

A facebook group entitled 'Ex-soldier Paul Clarke should not go to jail for handing in a gun', has almost 700 members and his solicitor, Mr Lionel Blackman, has been interviewed on Radio 4 about the case.

Angry readers have also set up online petitions to send to 10 Downing Street, and have been writing to Crispin Blunt MP.

ThisisSurreytoday has also received comments from across the globe.

Mr Clarke said: "The support has just been overwhelming. I've had strangers coming up to me in the street telling me they support me."

But despite the public support, Mr Clarke is convinced he's going to prison.

He said: "The judge has to do his job, and his job is to rule on a conviction.

"I wish I had just thrown the gun in a bush now " however wrong that is. But I wanted to do the right thing."
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Nov, 2009 12:47 pm
@wandeljw,
wandeljw wrote:

Quote:
Celebs show support for ex-soldier's case
(ThisIsSurreyToday.com, November 19, 2009)

An ex-soldier is "overwhelmed" by the frenzy of public support generated by a Surrey Mirror story.

Last week, we reported how Paul Clarke is facing a minimum of five years imprisonment after finding a discarded shotgun and handing it into police.

The 27-year-old from Merstham found the sawn-off shotgun in March this year, handed it in to Reigate police station, where he was arrested immediately.

On November 10, a jury at Guildford Crown Court found him guilty of possessing a firearm " he is now facing a minimum of five years behind bars.

Since the story broke it has caused outrage across the world " and whipped up a frenzy of online debate and support.

Mr Clarke, who spent two years serving in the armoured military in Donchester, said: "It's been mad. I feel like a celebrity. I just want to thank everyone for all their support."

Over the weekend, Mr Clarke's court case was one of the most commented stories on social networking site 'Twitter' " getting more mention than 'Jedward' the controversial X-Factor contestants.

His case caught the attention of several celebrities, including comedians David Mitchell and Simon Pegg, star of 'Shaun of the Dead' and 'How to Lose Friends and Alienate People'.

And, Graham Lineham, creator of the hit TV sit-com Father Ted 'tweeted' in response to other comments on the story.

He wrote: "There'll be enough interest in Paul Clarke now [to] at least shed a little light on [the] situation. Wait for that before pitchforks/petitions".

Bloggers across the world have fiercely debated the 'strict liability' aspect of the law on which Mr Clarke was convicted " where the intention of anybody possessing a firearm is irrelevant.

A facebook group entitled 'Ex-soldier Paul Clarke should not go to jail for handing in a gun', has almost 700 members and his solicitor, Mr Lionel Blackman, has been interviewed on Radio 4 about the case.

Angry readers have also set up online petitions to send to 10 Downing Street, and have been writing to Crispin Blunt MP.

ThisisSurreytoday has also received comments from across the globe.

Mr Clarke said: "The support has just been overwhelming. I've had strangers coming up to me in the street telling me they support me."

But despite the public support, Mr Clarke is convinced he's going to prison.

He said: "The judge has to do his job, and his job is to rule on a conviction.

"I wish I had just thrown the gun in a bush now " however wrong that is. But I wanted to do the right thing."

Instead of considering the wisdom
of strict liability statutes, thay shoud consider
repealing gun control and restore the English freedom
of self defense that existed until around 1920
.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Nov, 2009 02:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Did they have twitter in 1920?
 

Related Topics

The Stupid Laws Thread - Discussion by Craven de Kere
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 05:21:37