2
   

Patriotism: Trash or Treasure?

 
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Oct, 2003 11:01 pm
Eisenhower.
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Oct, 2003 11:28 pm
Can anyone honestly tell me that the kind of patriotism espoused by the Bush administration is not evil?

http://www.vaiw.org/vet/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=161
A site for Veterans Against The Iraq War--the following excerpts were taken from the above site:

As General Douglas MacArthur noted:

• "The powers in charge keep us in a perpetual state of fear: Keep us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant sums demanded. Yet in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have been quite real…."
====
The following letter was written by Stephen Coder, U.S, Army (Ret.)

George W. Bush
The White House
Washington D.C.

Sir,

I am writing to you as a concerned citizen and military veteran. When my family first arrived in America in 1732, the United States did not yet exist and the eastern seaboard was ruled by a King who had no respect for the people who lived there. The sons of the first Coder's fought for liberty and freedom from that King. In fact, my family has fought in every conflict and war that this nation has ever engaged in, some paying for our freedom with their lives. My father fought at Bataan and survived the Death March and 3 1/2 years as a POW, he then fought again in Korea. I served as a Marine grunt in Viet Nam and also in the Army during Grenada, Panama, and Gulf War I (Desert Storm). My son is now serving in Iraq. He has been there from the very beginning.

I have watched the direction that you and your Administration are taking this nation and I have been recoiling in horror. You and your Attorney General are one by one eroding the freedoms that so many of us have fought and died for. You have turned most of the Free World
against us and destroyed the respect most of the people on this planet held for this country. You claim to be a Christian and a man of honor, if that were so then the only honorable thing that you could do is order the resignation of nearly all of your appointees and decline to run again for any public office. But we both know you are not a man of honor, and we both know that you are not a Christian either. Christ must retch every time he hears you refer to your self as one.

Please, for the good of this great nation, you must step aside and allow us to get on with the business of freedom, liberty, and justice.

Stephen Coder
U.S. Army (Ret)
Las Vegas, NV
====
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Oct, 2003 11:30 pm
Eisenhower
Eisenhower's wisdom:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13816&highlight=
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 12:27 am
perception wrote:
Since I and others like me would not give up our patriotism(evil though it is) without a fight , would it be logical that you would have to kill us.


Come now perc, I hate seafood with a passion. Does that mean I want to kill all fish? Or those who eat fish?

Nowhere did anyone here say that patriots should be killed. You are taking great liberties with your arguments.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 02:49 am
Ok - how do we love a country? Now - landscape I understand - but a country? Do people espouse to love a sort of Platonic ideal of their country, or their actual nuts and bolts neighbours, the fella who farts in the lift, the back alley where the cats piss, the local sewerage farm, the Empire State Building, the Metropolitan Museum of Art?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 04:44 am
Upon one's return to their native land or region after a long absence, there are many aspects of that place which will appeal to them--things which they will hear and smell and see, things which will resonate with them deeply, as Yeats expresses when he speaks of the lake isle at Innisfree . . .

I will arise and go now, for always night and day
I hear lake water lapping with low sounds by the shore;
While I stand on the roadway, or on the pavements gray,
I hear it in the deep heart's core.


What we "hear in the deep heart's core," and what is served up by political exploiters, such as Rove, are not the same things. There is nothing wrong with patriotism--rather, it is what is done with a concept of patriotrism, for the partisan, and often venal, ends of others.
0 Replies
 
RicardoTizon
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 06:27 am
Dlowan wrote:
Ok - how do we love a country?

I'll give an example based on my personal experience. 1984 Los Angeles Olympic, opening ceremony, they played the star spangled banner. I look around people around me and some of them are almost in tears, I included. For some strange reason I feel that I love this country very much at that exact moment and time. I was twenty two years old then. Now I do not know if I still feels the same way.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 06:48 am
I love the founding of this country, the Declaration of Independance, the Constitution, the disrespect of class systems, the idea and practice of being born with nothing-but becoming what you aspire to with hard work and perhaps a little luck, Democracy, the sacrifices made to free us from tyranny and to keep us free, a free press, ...

Don't love our history with Native Americans, some CIA operations, slavery, ill-concieved wars, a free press :wink: ...

There's a lot to love, and a lot to improve, and/or learn from.

I see something good-to improve.
Some see something bad-to criticise.

To each, his own.


blatham's post--
Quote:
Again, this is a matter of clarifying terms.

If you are speaking of 'talking points', then (if we use the normal usage) you are speaking of someone functioning as an agent of a party (or a candidate) who has been briefed on what to say/not say before some public utterance, so as to forward the PR line of that candidate or party.

Yes. This is what I'm talking about. The ones who put out the talking points, and the ones who follow obligingly--including editorial pages, certain individuals in positions of power, and some in the media. There are contingents on both sides.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 07:58 am
Craven de Kere wrote:
perception wrote:
Since I and others like me would not give up our patriotism(evil though it is) without a fight , would it be logical that you would have to kill us.


Come now perc, I hate seafood with a passion. Does that mean I want to kill all fish? Or those who eat fish?

Nowhere did anyone here say that patriots should be killed. You are taking great liberties with your arguments.


Dys espouses that ALL patriotism is evil---my logic says that in order to get rid of the EVIL in patriotism you must kill all patriots. He also espouses anarchy which means that you first must destroy the gov't in power before he can advance on to his idea of a perfect gov't.

Don't worry I don't expect you to agree so let's just let it drop.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 08:06 am
Hmm, dys is cryptic but his indictment might have been as much against the concept of evil as it was against patriotism.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 08:20 am
dys, criptic? Never seen it happen.

sofia

My aim was to narrow down the term to a level of specificity that could be useful. General terms and phrases only muddy our noggins and our discourse.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 08:48 am
dys said:
"
Quote:
A common usuage of patriotism is the elimination of other voices to be heard but in doing so, eliminates all voices."

Perception understood:
Quote:
"Dys espouses that ALL patriotism is evil"
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:06 am
perception wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
Wth sincere regards to deb the dlowan, i offer an opinion. Patriotism, that is the desire to protect the power in a society by way of increasing the power of a society, is inherently belligerent. Since there can be no awards of accomplishment without opponents, patriots must create enemies before we can require protection from them. Patriots can ony flourish where boundries are well-defined, hostile and dangerous. The spirit of patriotism is therefore characterisacally associated with the military or other modes of international conflcit. Because patriotism is always the desire to contain others outside its purvue it is always evil in its intent. Wanting the best outcome for your family, your neighborhood, your communityis very positive in a sense of patroitism, but needing that by diminishing others is offensive.


Dyslexia offered the above as an opinion but without regard for the feelings of anyone reading it who might take offense at such as this:

Because patriotism is ALWAYS the desire to contain others outside it's purvue it is ALWAYS EVIL in it's intent. This is a damn insult and anyone here who doesn't take offense would willingly let anyone put chains on them.

That inclues you specifically BBB


Dys
I refer you to your original episal and my response----If you wish to retract this extremist view then do so in public
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:16 am
I retract nothing, I offered an opinion and stated it as such. you extrapolated from that that i wished to kill those who disagree (patriots) when reading in context
Quote:
"Wanting the best outcome for your family, your neighborhood, your community is very positive in a sense of patroitism, but needing that by diminishing others is offensive.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:23 am
Dys

I offer this as an opinion also: Left wing extremist views(Dys) are just as dangerous as those of right wing extremists (the Oklahoma bomber and those who murder abortion doctors)
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:42 am
Perc,

It does seem that you're assuming Dyslexia's intentions about what he meant by what he said rather than asking him what he meant. If his meaning is unclear to you, I think it's better to ask first. Dependency on unfounded assumptions creates confusion. What is it that you feel is so disreputable in Dys' stated opinion that you would liken him to the Oklahoma bomber and murders? He hasn't mentioned murder.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:54 am
Lola
Lola, I think Dys's statement has been distorted by Perception. I know Dys will correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Dys meant the abuse of others via patriotism is what is evil, not benign patriotism itself.

BBB
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:57 am
exactly
0 Replies
 
JoanneDorel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 09:59 am
While in Austin Mrs. PD and I had the opportunity to discuss the matters stated about with two Army Officers from Ft. Bragg. And surprise, surprise - they do not support this war, they had already served in Kosovo, and both had order to spend a year in Iraq.

Question their patriotism, never, question their leaders. They did and indicated Rummy was out of his mind and there should be some changes in the chain of command.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 21 Oct, 2003 10:00 am
Lola

It would seem from what you say that I have no right to derive a conclusion from what Dys says is an opinion to be his actual belief. If I offered an opinion that I thought Hitler and Stalin were just misunderstood schoolboys I can imagine the outrage. I would suggest that if he doesn't actually believe what he suggests then why should anyone take him seriously about anything.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

What are your national delusions? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Homeless Man Saves American Flag - Discussion by failures art
I want the US to lose the war in Iraq - Discussion by joefromchicago
kneel v stand - Question by dalehileman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/06/2024 at 09:35:01