Minuteman Leader murders 9 year old girl.

Quote:

The more he deviates from them, the more liberal is his interpretation of your contract, the more he lies about it and cheats u.

Now you are not making any sense at all David.

If someone deviates from a contract, it in no way means he lies about it or cheats you.

Contracts change all the time for various reasons. Construction contracts pretty much REQUIRE that they change. The construction has to meet code. If the contractor doesn't fulfill the contract because of circumstances outside the contract that doesn't make him a cheat or a liar. It means the contract is only valid within certain limits. As a lawyer you should understand that.

Yes, and I said the prosecutor could try to charge the surviving parent. It would however be very hard to prove and likely a complete waste of resources.

The selling of drugs isn't what caused the death. It was the defense of their home that did. While the persons may have been in possession of drugs they weren't currently selling them so it would be difficult to argue that the act of having drugs was a danger to the child and caused the child's death by gunfire.

Edgar for "murder" you need intent - clearly lacking in this case. Maybe David will explain the law to us chapter and verse, but in this case either accidental death or "2nd degree manslaughter" sounds more likely imo.

I'm surprised that YOU dare answer on this thread - if you had ANY real interest in the death of the girl you would have FOUND OUT by now WHOSE gun fired the bullet that killed her - the ballistics results came back long ago. All you care about is scoring cheap political points, not the death of a child - ditto for the clowns who followed your lead, btw, did ANY of you look up who fired the shot that killed the girl?

Do you now KNOW if either PARENT's gun killed her? No - of course not! So much for your "compassion". Hypocrites, one and all.

Sorry I missed your post earlier - that is precisely the point here, nobody "murdered" the girl, as the crazy title here suggests: the parents (illegals) were selling (illegal) drugs in a house not duly rented by them (so illegally occupied by them at the time), persons entered the premises, there was an exchange of gunfire, the girl was shot dead.

Edgar for "murder" you need intent - clearly lacking in this case.

Defense attorneys for Albert Gaxiola have asked Judge John Leonardo to reconsider his decision to allow prosecutors to pursue the death penalty for him. Gaxiola, Shawna Forde and Jason Bush are charged with first-degree murder in last year's deaths of Raul Flores, Jr. and his young daughter, Brisenia. If convicted, the three could receive the death penalty.

Shawna Forde should face the death penalty if convicted of a May 30 home-invasion robbery in Arizona that left a young girl and her father dead, Arizona officials have decided

High Seas wrote:

I'm surprised that YOU dare answer on this thread - if you had ANY real interest in the death of the girl you would have FOUND OUT by now WHOSE gun fired the bullet that killed her - the ballistics results came back long ago. All you care about is scoring cheap political points, not the death of a child - ditto for the clowns who followed your lead, btw, did ANY of you look up who fired the shot that killed the girl?

Do you now KNOW if either PARENT's gun killed her? No - of course not! So much for your "compassion". Hypocrites, one and all.

Do you have a link to that ballistics evidence? I only ask, because I just spent a little bit of time searching for it and was unable to find it.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

High Seas wrote:

I'm surprised that YOU dare answer on this thread - if you had ANY real interest in the death of the girl you would have FOUND OUT by now WHOSE gun fired the bullet that killed her - the ballistics results came back long ago. All you care about is scoring cheap political points, not the death of a child - ditto for the clowns who followed your lead, btw, did ANY of you look up who fired the shot that killed the girl?

Do you now KNOW if either PARENT's gun killed her? No - of course not! So much for your "compassion". Hypocrites, one and all.

Do you have a link to that ballistics evidence? I only ask, because I just spent a little bit of time searching for it and was unable to find it.

Cycloptichorn

The point isn't if I, personally, have it (and btw, I do, as do the prosecutors) the point is that you, Brown-Munoz, Parados, et al, DO NOT HAVE IT and still blithely claim to be ballistics experts, legal experts, judges, juries ALL WITHOUT ANY RELEVANT FACTS.

One good thing I have to say for all of you (except Parados, who doesn't understand the differenct between an indictment and a conviction) is that you all had the decency to stop posting once your ignorance of the facts became obvious.

One good thing I have to say for all of you (except Parados, who doesn't understand the differenct between an indictment and a conviction) is that you all had the decency to stop posting once your ignorance of the facts became obvious.