Darwinists: Persisting despite the evidence

Fail on all attempts.

It is not said assertions that got us where we are, but instead, Science. Life in the 1500's had the same set of assertions that we have today; and yet, we are FAR more advanced then we were 500 years ago. Entirely due to testable science.

(I surmise that I shoud give up on getting a reply from Spendius
to the questions that I presented earlier.)

I thought they were for gunga.

What were the questions?

....Introduction

Of the many factors that produced the Nazi holocaust and World War II, one of the most important was Darwin’s notion that evolutionary progress occurs mainly as a result of the elimination of the weak in the struggle for survival. Although it is no easy task to assess the conflicting motives of Hitler and his supporters, Darwinism-inspired eugenics clearly played a critical role. Darwinism justified and encouraged the Nazi views on both race and war. If the Nazi party had fully embraced and consistently acted on the belief that all humans were descendants of Adam and Eve and equal before the creator God, as taught in both the Old Testament and New Testament Scriptures, the holocaust would never have occurred.....

1. I don't know.

2. I don't know.

3. I don't know.

4. I don't know.

And I don't care either. And I can't understand anybody who does care.

I'll say it again: Evolution is garbage science and, as garbage science goes, a spectacularly dangerous and evil variety of such

I'll say it again: Evolution is garbage science and, as garbage science goes, a spectacularly dangerous and evil variety of such.

http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust

Quote:

....Introduction

Of the many factors that produced the Nazi holocaust and World War II, one of the most important was Darwin’s notion that evolutionary progress occurs mainly as a result of the elimination of the weak in the struggle for survival. Although it is no easy task to assess the conflicting motives of Hitler and his supporters, Darwinism-inspired eugenics clearly played a critical role. Darwinism justified and encouraged the Nazi views on both race and war. If the Nazi party had fully embraced and consistently acted on the belief that all humans were descendants of Adam and Eve and equal before the creator God, as taught in both the Old Testament and New Testament Scriptures, the holocaust would never have occurred.....

Quote:

I'll say it again: Evolution is garbage science and, as garbage science goes, a spectacularly dangerous and evil variety of such

.

What a completely delusional dippyshit is GUNGASNAKE. He will believe in any myth and Biblical tale even though it contains he without any evidence at all, yet will try to dismiss soundly evidenced science in his fevered . All because he fears Naziis and Communists. (The reality was that Hitler was a YEC and The Soviet Union preached Lysenko and Lamark , because Darwin was "Bourgeois".
I understand that GUNGASNAKE also hates all Muslims , so I suppose that he now denies algebra.
It must be marvelous living in a world of fantasy .

Quote:

Young Earth Creationist,
(As opposed to an "OEC" ,Old Earth Creationists).

I see; thanx.
In what respects do thay disagree ?

YEC is only one of several forms of creationism. YECs typically oppose these alternative theories, which they consider to be "controlled by the findings of 'science'"[58] or otherwise flawed.


[edit] Old Earth creationism
See also: Old Earth creationism
YECs reject Old Earth creationism and Day-Age Creationism on textual and theological grounds. In addition, they claim the scientific data in geology and astronomy point to a young Earth, against the consensus of the general scientific community.

YECs generally hold that when Genesis describes the creation of the Earth occurring over a period of days, this indicates normal-length 24 hour days, and cannot reasonably be interpreted otherwise. They agree that the Hebrew word for "day" (yôm) can refer to either a 24-hour day or a long or unspecified time, but argue that whenever the latter interpretation is used it includes a preposition defining the long or unspecified period. In the specific context of Genesis 1, since the days are both numbered and are referred to as "evening and morning", this can mean only normal-length days. Further, they argue that the 24-hour day is the only interpretation that makes sense of the Sabbath command in Exodus 20:8"11. YECs argue that it is a glaring exegetical fallacy to take a meaning from one context (yom referring to a long period of time in Genesis 1) and apply it to a completely different one (yom referring to normal-length days in Exodus 20).[59]

Further, YECs argue that their position is the only way to explain the Fall, which introduced death and suffering into the world. They argue that all long-age views entail death before sin, which they regard as a severe theological error, violating Genesis 3, and for Christians, Romans 5:12"19, 8:17"22 and 1 Corinthians 15:21"22.[60]. Further discussion and refutation of these objections can be found on the Day-Age Creationism page.


[edit] Gap creationism
See also: Gap creationism
The "gap theory" acknowledges a vast age for the universe, including the Earth and solar system, while asserting that life was created recently in six 24-hour days by divine fiat. Genesis 1 is thus interpreted literally, with an indefinite "gap" of time inserted between the first two verses. (Some gap theorists insert a "primordial creation" and Lucifer's rebellion into the gap.)

Most YEC organizations reject the gap theory, and say it is unscriptural, unscientific, and not necessary, in its various forms.[61][62] It is asserted that the entire universe is only thousands of years old.


[edit] The Omphalos hypothesis
See also: Omphalos hypothesis
Many YECs distinguish their own hypotheses from the "Omphalos hypothesis", today more commonly referred to as the apparent age concept, put forth by the naturalist and science writer Philip Henry Gosse. Omphalos was an unsuccessful mid-19th century attempt to reconcile creationism with geology. Gosse proposed that just as Adam had a navel (omphalos is Greek for navel), evidence of a gestation he never experienced, so also the Earth was created ex nihilo complete with evidence of a prehistoric past that never actually occurred. The Omphalos hypothesis allows for a young Earth without giving rise to any predictions that would contradict scientific findings of an old Earth. Although both logically unassailable and consistent with a literal reading of Scripture, Omphalos was rejected at the time by scientists on the grounds that it was completely unfalsifiable and by theologians because it implied to them a deceitful God, which they found theologically unacceptable.

Most YECs today argue that Adam did not have a navel,[63] and in contrast to Gosse, posit that not only is the Earth young but the scientific data supports that view. However, the apparent age concept is still used in YEC literature.[64][65][66]