hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 May, 2009 09:35 pm
@gungasnake,
Quote:
One way or another it has to be made both socially acceptable and economically possible for people to marry and start families at 17 = 20.

Basic reality for people to the right of center like myself is that we're going to be paying for some sort of such welfare one way or another and I'd for damned certain rather be paying for American kids to be able to start families here than for Mexican illegals to be here in the "anchor baby" business


as a2k's token socialist let me say that I agree with you completely.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 May, 2009 10:09 pm
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
One way or another it has to be made both socially acceptable and economically possible for people to marry and start families at 17 = 20.

Why?
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:02 am
@hawkeye10,
It appears that gunga believes that "American" is a species. What a dipshit he is.
Blaming Darwin for Eugenics is like blaming Pasteur for the Swine Flu.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:14 am
Quote:
This 60 minute special features experts such as Lee Strobel, Jonathan Wells, Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, and Ann Coulter . . .


Experts ? ! ? ! ?

Ah-hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha . . .

Nothin' like makin' yer case with expert testimony . . .

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha . . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:20 am
Somebody should tell Gunga Dim that his expression "Basic reality is . . . " has gotten terribly shopworn, and that he should do something to improve his screeds stylistically--as in coming up with a different expression to introduce his entirely unsubstantiated statements from authority, an authority we have no reason to assume he possesses.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 04:47 am
@Setanta,
I think hes an aluminum siding sales rep in his day job. He comes across with so many logical falacies already built into his presentation that I know his primary targets are the gullible Evangelicals and old Ladies who , foresaking their past lives of sin, wish to reserve a seat on the Pearly GAte Express.
solipsister
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 05:10 am
@farmerman,
pasteurise, oo up to my neck will do

check ernie the fastest milkman in the west
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 05:16 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Blaming Darwin for Eugenics is like blaming Pasteur for the Swine Flu.


Rubbish.

What's up with eugenics. Are you only a Darwinian when there's money in it and go all wishy-washy when the nitty-gritty operates.

You're a phoney effemm. A good Christian underneath.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 06:07 am
@farmerman,
Good point . . . reminds me of those hucksters who sell drive-way repaving, and their "crew" shows up and spreads used motor oil . . .
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 06:11 am
@Setanta,
I think that, with the help of you and so many other patient participants, I have finally ascended the ziggurat of acclaim. I think thta I am being ignored by the snake.


I want to thank the Academy who madse it possible. I also wish to thank my family who maxde it necessary.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 06:15 am
@hawkeye10,
Rapist boy doesn't agree because he is "socialist" (Jesus, what a liar)--he agrees because he salivates at the prospect of screwing girls under the age of 18.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 06:56 am
@Setanta,
I've never done that but there is a powerful psychological theory that says that preventing sexually mature females from fulfilling their biological determinants because they have not reached a puritan age of consent causes them all sorts of mental problems which then cause physiological problems. An age of consent, particularly one of 18, is an entirely Christian invention. Such things are unheard of in evolution. And in many other cultures and even our own in previous centuries.

Set looks stupid as a proponent of evolution theory who then comes over as a good Christian when his righteous indignation needs some exercise.

0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 08:41 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

This 60 minute special features experts such as Lee Strobel, Jonathan Wells, Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, and Ann Coulter who will show why evolution is a bad idea that should be discarded into the dustbin of history.

Laughing experts Laughing
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 09:07 am
That one cracked me up, too. I had some really nasty thoughts about precisely what it is that Coulter can be considered to be expert at doing . . .
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 09:17 am
@Setanta,
Coulter is a drag queen on weekends, the rest of the week she teaches Biochemistry at Hopkins.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 10:04 am
@farmerman,
Strobel is a born again douche bag and Phil Johnsons been in a semi coma since his last strokes in 2001.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 May, 2009 10:50 am
Dear me!!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion? - Discussion by wandeljw
Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution - Discussion by wandeljw
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
U.S. Lags World in Grasp of Genetics and Acceptance of Evolution - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Is the theory of evolution correct? - Question by kampung
More (much more) dinosaur soft tissue turning up - Discussion by gungasnake
Miss USA delegates on evolution in schools - Discussion by hingehead
Is Evolution a Dangerous Idea? If so, why? - Discussion by edgarblythe
Future of evolution - Question by elletheduck
Don't tell me there's no proof for evolution - Discussion by aperson
Armored fish: yet another body blow to evolosers and evoloserism - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Darwin's Deadly Legacy
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:57:50
▲ ▼