10
   

Is the number 2 simpler than the number 1?

 
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Mar, 2009 05:54 am
@contrex,
Quote:
solipsister, you are a troll. "one is nothing"? 1 = 0? What planet did you learn to count on?


He is clearly reasoning in base-1. ("There are 0 types of people.")
solipsister
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Mar, 2009 06:06 am
@ebrown p,
one is muchly amused by abcedarians

0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Mar, 2009 09:16 am
@contrex,
contrex wrote:

solipsister, you are a troll. "one is nothing"? 1 = 0? What planet did you learn to count on?


Contrex - I don't know if the statement to which you took exception came from someone with little mathematical training or from an expert in initial-boundary value problems in relation to finite difference schemes, as outlined here, for instance >



> because in the latter case the statement actually makes perfect sense. As to the base of -1 on which some dimwit claimed you're operating: that claim can only have come from someone ignorant of the conjugate gradient method, at the very least, and can be safely ignored.
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Mar, 2009 09:29 am
@High Seas,
Quote:
As to the base of -1 on which some dimwit claimed you're operating: that claim can only have come from someone ignorant of the conjugate gradient method, at the very least, and can be safely ignored.


Lol ... and some say that High Seas has no sense of humor.
0 Replies
 
solipsister
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Mar, 2009 12:05 am
@High Seas,
enjoyed the link so much hi c's icing

fourier's a jolly good fellow while poincare is not a conjecture

why don't you adversarial lads post some risible probs to qed
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Jun, 2011 04:53 pm
@aidan,
Se sounds like you may be synesthetic.

Rap
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Jun, 2011 04:55 pm
@Francis,
You've divided by zero.

Rap
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Jun, 2011 05:00 pm
When I was a wee lad my grandfather 'larned' me there were only four types of integers 0, 1, prime, and composite (product of primes). I took that to heart and found that I excelled in arithmetic.

Rap
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Jun, 2011 05:59 pm
@ebrown p,
ebrown I like what your question suggests. "What planet did you"...suggests that arithemtic is an expression of our species' physiology, and that elsewhere in the galaxy mathematical axioms that are self-evident "truths" for them may not seem so obviously true for us.
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Jun, 2011 06:01 pm
@JLNobody,
One and two are different quantitatively and qualitatively?
0 Replies
 
raprap
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2011 05:54 pm
1 is the multiplicative identity--it's the only multiplicative identity.

Rap
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 03:32:47