@Joe Nation,
I'm not kidding at all, and I'm not as sure as you that bipo is either.
Please explain what is so readfully wrong (and contrary to our constitution) about assasinating a person in a foreign country who we can reasonably conclude is a nexus for American death and destruction?
If we could have assasinated Bin Laden and the top tier of al Qaeda a year or two before 9/11, we should not have?
Th german generals who tried and failed to assasinate Hitler were evil?
Saddam is dead. Wouldn't it have been a better result if a sniper had taken him out many years ago?
Of course there is no assurances that the target of an assisnation will generate American death and destruction, or that after he or she is killed the death and destruction will be averted.
The decisions of our leaders would be quite easy to make if they could be sure how their choices will pan out, but obviously they cannot.
It never ceases to amuse me when post-modernists draw moral lines in the sand when it suits their sensibilties.