Scaramouche2 wrote:Why does the majority of the human population have such a strong will to survive, yet no one has a clear cut answer to the meaning of life?
One can explain the population's will to survive in terms of our evolutionary history (and present, and future): if people didn't have a "will to live" (didn't want to live), they would die. Dead people don't have as many offspring, I'd think.
With that in mind, why should there be a clear cut answer to the "meaning of life"? Is it a proper question in the first place? People have been thinking about these things for centuries and centuries and, in my opinion, have come to no valid universal conclusions which are still as subjective as "meaning". The 'meaning of life' has been diverse between groups of people and changed over time: religions seem determined to supply a dogma of a meaning of life (or a non-meaning) to their followers and philosphers have changed their ideas over time. You can start with Schopenhauer and Nietzsche for some more recent (and still over a century old) philosophy on the subject, although they both indulge in the most popular (imo) pastime of philosophers: invent consistent stories and eschew formal deduction.
Scaramouche2 wrote: Also, why are most of the suicidal people the people who live more comfortable lives? Wouldn't make more sense that the highest suicide rate to be amongst those who are starving to death?
I have to admit I don't know very much about the studies behind this popular claim, which comes in a couple of different variations like, 'poorer people are happier' or 'the poor have a greater sense of community'. As such, I'm skeptical (not simply doubting) of that claim. Perhaps it's true, perhaps it isn't. I could come up with some reasons why studies would get positive results and still be inaccurate: the proper reporting of suicide varies between countries and poorer countries may keep worse records. I could also come up with reasons why it would be true: the poor have more essential needs and pleasures and less time to sit about philosophizing or going brain-dead in front of a television. They spend time with their families, they eat, and they work. All of this implies that having that extra time and possessions might mean spending less time with people who care for you or that the different goals alienate you from your self-worth.
To appeal to some more German culture (I've been reading primary texts lately, can you tell?), one idea common in the late middle ages was that of the happy poor free men and serfs who essentially lived such hard lives of such low expectations that being happy was its own reward.