0
   

Bush quickly rushes through last dismantlement of environmental and consumer protections

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2008 09:12 pm
A Last Push To Deregulate

Prepare to be unsurprised yet shocked, or the other way round, one last time. Key parts:

Quote:
The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

Once such rules take effect, they typically can be undone only through a laborious new regulatory proceeding, including lengthy periods of public comment, drafting and mandated reanalysis.

"They want these rules to continue to have an impact long after they leave office," said Matthew Madia, a regulatory expert at OMB Watch [..]. He called the coming deluge "a last-minute assault on the public . . . happening on multiple fronts."


Quote:
The burst of activity has made this a busy period for lobbyists who fear that industry views will hold less sway after the elections. [..]

According to the Office of Management and Budget's regulatory calendar, the commercial scallop-fishing industry came in two weeks ago to urge that proposed catch limits be eased, nearly bumping into National Mining Association officials making the case for easing rules meant to keep coal slurry waste out of Appalachian streams.


Quote:
Many of the rules that could be issued over the next few weeks would ease environmental regulations, according to sources familiar with administration deliberations.

A rule put forward by the National Marine Fisheries Service and now under final review by the OMB would lift a requirement that environmental impact statements be prepared for certain fisheries-management decisions and would give review authority to regional councils dominated by commercial and recreational fishing interests. [..]

Lee Crockett of the Pew Charitable Trusts' Environment Group said the administration has received 194,000 public comments on the rule and protests from 80 members of Congress as well as 160 conservation groups. "This thing is fatally flawed" as well as "wildly unpopular," Crockett said.

Two other rules nearing completion would ease limits on pollution from power plants, a major energy industry goal for the past eight years that is strenuously opposed by Democratic lawmakers and environmental groups.

One rule, being pursued over some opposition within the Environmental Protection Agency, would allow current emissions at a power plant to match the highest levels produced by that plant, overturning a rule that more strictly limits such emission increases. According to the EPA's estimate, it would allow millions of tons of additional carbon dioxide into the atmosphere annually, worsening global warming.

A related regulation would ease limits on emissions from coal-fired power plants near national parks.

A third rule would allow increased emissions from oil refineries, chemical factories and other industrial plants with complex manufacturing operations.

These rules "will force Americans to choke on dirtier air for years to come, unless Congress or the new administration reverses these eleventh-hour abuses," said lawyer John Walke of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,237 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Nov, 2008 04:58 am
well, lets see how a John McCain admin would deal with this(if hes a true maverick McCain should dump many of these 11th hour reg changes).

. Ive seen the new FERC requirements on reduced EIS requirements for proposed LNG facilities and they are a joke. I wasnt familiar with air emissions on existing facilities going backward, are you sure?
We always knew that Bush was a whore to industrial interests, however, I understand that there can be stays placed on the dates when any new (lame duck) regs take effect.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bush quickly rushes through last dismantlement of environmental and consumer protections
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/09/2020 at 06:33:42