0
   

Another victim of 'The War Against Terrorism'

 
 
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 03:05 pm
US soldier kills rare tiger
20/09/2003

Bagdad - An American soldier shot and killed a rare Bengal tiger in Baghdad zoo during an apparently drunken party, the head of the zoo said on Saturday.

"The soldiers arrived in the evening with food and beer, accompanied by a group of Iraqi police officers," Adel Salman Musa said of the incident on Thursday night.

"One of the soldiers, who the Iraqi police said had drunk a lot, went into the cage against the advice of his colleagues and tried to feed the animal, who severely hurt his arm," he explained to AFP.

The tiger tore off one of the soldier's fingers and mauled his arm. One of the other soldiers immediately fired at the animal and killed it, he said.

"The soldiers don't have the right to behave like that. That was the most precious and valuable animal in the whole zoo. It was 14 years old and had been born here," Salman Musa said.

The Bengal tiger is an endangered species which is protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and the World Conservation Union (IUCN).

There are only 3 000-4 500 of these creatures left in the wild.

Salman Musa said US soldiers often held parties in the zoo in the evenings. "We have no way of stopping them," he said.

US Sergeant Mark Ingham confirmed to AFP that an American soldier had killed the tiger on Thursday and said the incident was being investigated.

Baghdad zoo reopened to the public in July.

It houses 44 animals other than the prized tiger, most of which came from the palaces of deposed leader Saddam Hussein and his late son Uday, who was a lover of big cats.

A number of its animals were stolen in the confusion that followed the US-lead war. Most were killed for food or were stuffed and sold. - Sapa-AFP

source: news.24

Der Spiegel
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 875 • Replies: 19
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 03:15 pm
Damn, no excuses, the soldier is not a biker, hes a professional. Apparently the one who stepped in the cage needs some discipline. The one who shot the tiger, its a mixed call, hes protecting his fellow trooper , at a great expense.
Thats the trouble with 18 yeqar olds in position of power. Theyre still kids .
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 03:18 pm
You are right, farmerman.

(Hope, you are all right [re electricity et. al.] over the weekend!)
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 03:31 pm
naaah, we are gonna be without full power for days. I have a generator run through my tractor but its kinda loud. We need theminimal power for water pressure and refrig. All else is unusable. NO TV ,
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 03:49 pm
Hate to say it, but not something I wouldn't expect from an American troop. Despite the enticements thrown out by recruiters, the average US soldier is neither the best or the brightest. I recall a large number of long bone and c-spine injuries from the Rangers at Ft. Lewis, who would get liquored up and practice their PLF's out of the third story windows in their barracks.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 06:06 pm
were all the cast members of Jackass (the movie) in the military? NO. Hell, look at 18 year old college kids. Im not totally surprised but I am saddened. We dont need this kind of rap.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 06:10 pm
And why are most recruits in the 18-25 range? After that age one loses one's sense of invulnerablitity and desire for "brain off full speed ahead" activities. Been there, done that, much more sedate now. Smile
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 06:15 pm
Sure, that age group thinks it's immortal. They also heal quicker.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 06:23 pm
I'm quite glad I turned 36 this year. I am no longer facing those tornadoes in Karate tournaments any more. Instead I can face folks like me, who think both of strategy and our orthopedic/dental bills. Wink
However, in the military, many in that age group are in leaderdship positions. Granted, I knew more really competent, compassionate 23 year old E-5s than I did poor ones, but the few bad examples will always overshadow the positive ones. Whoever was in charge of the brave tiger fighter and its killer should be relieved. In that kind of an environment, going off to "get drunk" is like going off to commit suicide! The situation in Iraq seems (from my perspective in Denver, not Iraq) to be one where the platoona nd squad leadership needs to be activley involved with every soldier. Yes, the soldiers may resent it, but they are more likely to remain in one piece!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 06:56 pm
yeh I agree. Good leadership tries to keep your troops safe for battle (this includes leading them so they dont hurt themselves), for no reasons
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 07:39 pm
Stories like this really tick me off to no end. This makes me very angry and sad, to say the least.

Stupid, stupid people!!!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 09:09 pm
ARSEHOLES, total fvcking ARSEHOLES.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 09:09 pm
Just following the lead of their boss.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:15 pm
They're killing children, they're killing animals-how about going after Saddam?
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:16 pm
How foolish of me. They only fight those who cant fight back.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:20 pm
Wilso wrote:
How foolish of me. They only fight those who cant fight back.

Thats a bit harsh. I think what you have is a buch of young, scared kids with firearms. Not pleasant, not safe, not very bright. But, the average squaddie isn't a malignant toad. That is a job for elected officials! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:38 pm
hobitbob wrote:
Wilso wrote:
How foolish of me. They only fight those who cant fight back.

Thats a bit harsh. I think what you have is a buch of young, scared kids with firearms. Not pleasant, not safe, not very bright. But, the average squaddie isn't a malignant toad. That is a job for elected officials! Very Happy


And they do such a magnificent job of it.

But at some point, those carrying the guns have got to start shouldering some of the blame. 'just following orders' is getting a bit old.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:52 pm
What an odd position for me to be in..hmmm..here goes...
The US military is a microcosm of middle and lower middle class America. There is an over-representation of those with poor social skills and poor impulse control skills. The Army has long sold itself as an alternative to higher education, or as a pathway towards achieveing the cost of higher ed. In addition, the Enlisted Corps of the US Army tends to promote a lifestyle that can be described as "extended adolescence." Delayed gratifications are not encouraged, and a premium is placed upon macho exhuberence when off duty.The official distaste for alcohol related offences is directly countered by the importance of alcohoil as a social fluid in lower enlisted society. Holding one's drink,and the ability to "party hearty" are highly valued attributes of the lower enlisted soldier. Many soldiers express pride in drinking to stupor every night.
With this thrill seeking behaviour is also taught a peculiar attitude toward authority. Although ostensibly based on the concepts of duty and responsibility, the modern Army embraces a philosophy of doing as little as possible,and misbehaving as much as possible. "Shamming," avoiding duty by any means possible, is a valued skill for junior enlisted. Also valued is the ability to circumvent major rules and regulations and not get caught.
With the above principles in place, it becomes easy to understand that personal responsibility is not a valued trait among junior enlisted. Therefore the incidents of killing/wounding of unarmed civilians and various furred mammals should become understandable. Since no one is willing to take responsibility for anyone's actions, a sort of anarchy occurs.
I hope this has helped, although I think I have just confused myself. I will sleep on this and try to clarify tomorrow.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Sep, 2003 11:58 pm
Anyone who is stupid enough to walk into a tigers cage shouldn't be in the military. In fact, the man shouldn't even be able to walk the streets since he is obviously insane and a danger to himself, not to mention others. What does the govenment expect when the put guns in the hands of these children and teach them how to kill, then send them to war where they can be killed at any moment.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Sep, 2003 12:01 am
Here was this tiger minding his own business and now he's dead for no good reason at all. That just brings tears to my eyes!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Another victim of 'The War Against Terrorism'
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 10:09:03