@jespah,
Quote:
David -- take comic books as in take them for a day
or even a semester so that learning can go on.
Well, is this
distinct in principle
from a robber in the street who promises to return
the victim 's wallet the next day, or at the end of a semester ?
Shud that robber be
immune from prosecution if he returns the loot
(i.e., he converts it into an extorted loan) ?
Quote:There are conflicting "rights" going on.
OK, I am aware of the child's right to remain
unrobbed.
What
other rights are in operation, and to whom do thay belong ?
Does the teacher have a right to
force information
( be it accurate or not ) on the citizen ? (What about substantive disagreement ? )
Does the 13th Amendment have age limits on it ?
I don 't think it does.
One of the rights going on is that of self defense.
If the cititzen boldly and bravely rises to the defense
of his property, employing the degree of force
that is necessary to defeat the robber and preserve his property:
where does that leave us ?
Quote:
Is there a right to be disruptive in a class while others are trying to learn?
Absolutely
NOT.
The law against disturbing the peace applies.
Quote:I'd argue that even a kid reading quietly,
if it wasn't the subject matter, can be disruptive.
OK;
HOW can this be ?
I 'm willing to consider the argument. Please proceed.
What is it ?
Quote:
Somewhere in there, if we want children to learn
in a setting other than private one on one tutoring,
we need to have this kind of taking happen.
Do u wish to argue
that a citizen's rights (I have in mind that no person be deprived
of life, liberty or property without due process of law, 5th n 14th A.
and the principle against involuntary servitude of A#13)
are subverted or abrogated by what "
we"
want or
need ?
I have some doubts about that,
but I will listen to your arguments with an open mind.
Will u indicate the
jurisdictional predicate of the position
that u r representing ?
David