You seem to forget "people" were for the war because they were lied too, threats were exaggerated...the case purposefully overstated... and the "people" were still gullible enough to take their leaders at their word.... something that won't happen again anytime soon thanks to scumbag bush and his cronies...I knew it was bullshit from day one....
Oh, so what you are saying that Saddam's sons were not raping little girls and Saddam was not a dictator torturing and killing his own people by the 100’s of thousands and buying off UN diplomats who were supposed to be representing the free "civilized" countries of the world?
Your omission is your vast conspiracy.
Are you saying that the US can intercede in a country when devastated by a tsunami but we cannot intercede when a dictator decides to start mass murdering his people?
Your view is born out of a myopic partisan ignorance of human suffering and need for, ummm, "change".
Barack Obama voted against the liberation and "change:" that millions of Iraqis are now living "peacefully" in......
This single vote is a shame on Barack’s “foreign policy” record and effort (or lack thereof) that he would rather have left those girls being raped and left those innocent Iraqis in prisons and left the people in Iraq starving and neglected due to Saddam’s lust for “power“. Barack would have left Saddam still murderous and hungry for power and seen Saddam leave his murderous legacy to his sons to fulfill his desire to further attack his neighbors while he cleansed his country of anyone he chose. This legacy of dictatorial terror would have only been left to plague future generations. IS this the "change" Barack promises as he gives his "speech" in Germany? His "change" was to leave Europe and the Middle East with a festering cancer.
ILLEGAL WAR? If freeing Iraq is an Illegal war I would like to know the definition of a legal war?
A legal war is the war the dems have waged against conservatives. They show only one side of the news and then try and pull the plug on the free speech of the other side.
The dems are blind to human suffering and seek only power for the sake of power itself. JUST LIKE SADDAM…
The dems slide politically to whatever side they need at the time rather than being grounded in ethical concerns. i.e. pro life, pro God, pro country, pro family, pro education, pro business, pro independence from government. These I know the republican party stands for the most part. What do the dems really stand for but pro power? They will do even the unethical (such as Acorn) to get it.
These are viable positions they seem to only obstruct things in the simple name or "progressive" idea? This is not progress this takes us back by not allowing the necessary work of the people to be done in a timely fashion. The democrats could not even agree on putting an energy bill together. If we need more nuclear then get a few new plants online. If we need electric cars then subsidize them so every American can buy one. Is this so hard to do? Yes because the democrats are bought off by their cronies.
So our economic crisis is because congress has not acted in a timely manner but for 8 years the democrats have obstructed and "progress" and lined their pockets with pork so they could dump it into agencies like "Acorn" to steal the votes, the foundation of what "democracy" is, away from the very people they claim to want to serve.