A unifying language for the metaphysical?

Science isn't about knowledge. It's about fact. Knowledge is a mix of fact and belief into what we refer to as truth.

Say What ???
Geeeeeee...I´m speechless !

I am assuming you will tell us why when you regain your words.

Kant tried to do something like this in his Prolegomena (or start something like this). He wanted Metaphysics to officially become a science after 2400 years of being regarded solely as a part of philosophy. It failed though. Poor Metaphysics haha.

I am sure we could set up a language, that is, we could construct one that is already interpreted. This languuage would have to be geared towards Metaphysical issues. There is a problem though in this: would anyone be able to come to a consensus on this language (a group of people that is).

Also we have to consider if there is already not a better language out there for metaphysics instead of having to create a new one. Or maybe a multitude of languages (math, logic, etc.).

Hi North, I took it from my self investigations into metaphysics at college, that as a prototypical cutting edge science, metaphysics deals with investigations into not just quantum mechanics (which it is commonly associated with), or theories of time or relativity, but actually with the depth and scope of all the interesting and perinent scientific theories and quantums. A beginning look into this complex and sophisticated realm will necessarily include a brief survey of other realms from Theatre (note the greeks and Nietsches the birth of tragedy), early and contemporary philosophy (which naturally follows on from the last point), Einsteins theory of relativity and Hawkins scientific revelations as well as a whole load of new stuff as well. I think there is room for God as both a theory and practice in this discussion, but it should not be allowed to distort the argument by getting stuck on this point. Rather it should fall into line alongside the other interesting ideas, as part of the overall discussion. Nothing more nothing less. The language needs to be in part part of the attitude and space given to the conversants in order to have a free and somehow multi-faith discussion at this time regarding these matters. That is my opinion anyhow, thanks.