23
   

Optical illusion, kids vs adults

 
 
boomerang
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 05:19 pm
@DrewDad,
Interesting!

So Sozlette is the only kid who sees dolphins?
CalamityJane
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 05:52 pm
@boomerang,
No, sozlet insisted they were whales, but beforehand she did see the couple too
(just didn't want to mention it)...
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 06:12 pm
I was just on the Funny pictures thread, and I saw that a while ago, I posted a really good optical illusion there too...











http://www.zoovip.com/files/59b200c9441bdd0cd975c6a35b3213c9.jpg
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 06:14 pm
@DrewDad,
I would think any child who was breast feed would at least see the woman. I first saw the couple and then I noticed they were framed with dolphins.

I could only see the young woman in the picture and squinting didn't help.

I like RG's lamp photo, as soon as I figured out it was a lamp.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 06:37 pm
@nimh,
What background?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 08:29 pm
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

I would think any child who was breast feed would at least see the woman.

Frankly, I don't see what breast feeding would have to do with it.

Didn't you bathe with your kids?
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 08:52 pm
Duckie says he sees two humans. Ducklet says she sees two people in a bottle floating in a river. So much for the dolphins. Or maybe I have pervy kids.
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 09:52 pm
@FreeDuck,
Funny! Perhaps the experiment works only with really small children
between 2 and 4 years old.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  0  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 09:57 pm
Not trying to step on Jane here, but I am pretty sure she has me on ignore anyway...

You folks are underestimating the power of the media on yer kids imaging...

If they watch TV, they see things that register unknowingly in their growing heads...
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2008 10:20 pm
@OmSigDAVID,

My opinion is not important here.

But in this local authority, the Thought Police of the social services would come down like a ton of bricks on anyone introducing visual sexual material (even that artfully composed of dolphins) to underage kids.

That would be classified as abuse.

squinney
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Aug, 2008 06:25 am
Dang, McTag! Could one not take their child to a museum of art then?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Aug, 2008 06:29 am
@McTag,
I see;
so u have to wait until thay r 18 or 21.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2008 07:47 am
@squinney,
Nope, because they might see (gasp!) boobies.

Not like they don't see more of them on the streets these days. Falling out all over, ass cheeks creeping out of micro minis....good grief, if Mctag is worried about sexually suggestive pictures, he might as well be an advocate for locking all kids under 18 in a dark room until they are "of age".
arkadeb313
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2009 06:55 am
@Robert Gentel,
I found the dolphins only after reading the text below. Nice illusive picture. i have no kid around to experiment.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2009 07:53 am
@Bella Dea,
Generally when someone refers to the "Thought Police," you can probably infer that they do not agree with that constabulary's policies...
0 Replies
 
KupKake14
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 May, 2009 09:40 am
@Robert Gentel,
. . . im 14 n i only see the dolphins ... i dont see the couple thing ... n thats rlly saying something...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

My daughter - Discussion by Seed
Nebraska Safe Haven Law - Discussion by Diest TKO
How fearful were you as a child? - Question by dlowan
Im white . - Discussion by shewolfnm
Excessive Public Affection to Small Children - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Imaginary Friends - Discussion by Joe Nation
Artwork by the grandkids - Discussion by edgarblythe
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/26/2019 at 02:09:16