@nimh,
Hey, it may come back. But you do realize if I really have to leave it at 5, the ones you already did more of are going to be hard to deal with (and we'd probably just delete a few). Doing that would be tricky, and could upset people so it will be easier to bring them back to 10 than it would to do this later.
So till we get the other database architecture problems solved I'm going to keep it simple, and I'm not quite sure where the sweet spot is just yet. There's a tradeoff between semantics and scale. If we allow it to go more broad, more scale is needed to keep abuse rare and I got to figure out a good balance between the two.