9
   

Is it wrong to view child pornography?

 
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:29 pm
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
hawkeye10 wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
hawkeye10 wrote:
Those who dismiss Agrote and his questions as the unimportant ramblings of a pedophile are the ignorant ones here. These kinds of questions are being asked by respectable people, are being written about in the popular press, and are in the courts. Apologies to Agrote are in order.
Speak of the A-hole and the A-hole appears. That article is one person's opinion and doesn't even scratch the surface of the heinousness you and your fellow A-hole have peddled here. Please join Agrote as he pulls a pin.


Yes, I understand that we free spirited thinkers disturb the tranquility of your closed mind, and likewise those of your fellow sheep. However, debate forums are only of use to those who can think for themselves, who don't feel that the cultural norms must be blindly followed even if they don't know why.


As much as I don't like the level of arrogance here, I agree. It would be nice if we could feel free from the constraints of socially accepted morality, just for the purpose of debate.
There's very likely no paedophiles here, and this discussion would be more beneficial if people didn't try and turn it into a witch hunt.
Have you read any of this thread? Agrote is self admitted and the A-hole you just quoted in agreement is well known for his misogyny, seems to believe the kids choose to participate... and has also argued that raping women ain't so bad. Real peach, that guy.

Sick, twisted mind Not Equal open mind
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:30 pm
PQ, principle.

which one is that...
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:33 pm
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
Oh don't be bloody ridiculous. As if anything that is said on here would make a slight bit of difference to a 'A hole' anyway.
Why don't you just make another thread specifically designed for the purpose insulting paedophiles?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not going to start a paedophile liberation front or anything, I don't give a **** about them or any 'rights' they might have, it's the principle of the thing I'm arguing for.
Interesting how you straight passed over the other, very real possibility I mentioned (spreading the poison by PM). Stop arguing for a minute and think.
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:34 pm
That they can't help feeling sexually attracted to children, therefore it's not inherently wrong.

If we were having a 'is murder wrong' discussion I doubt we would all start accusing each other of being murderers, why is this different?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:35 pm
Quoting Hawk,

Those who dismiss Agrote and his questions as the unimportant ramblings of a pedophile are the ignorant ones here. These kinds of questions are being asked by respectable people, are being written about in the popular press, and are in the courts. Apologies to Agrote are in order.



I don't know, for sure, of any of Agrote's personal takes and their ramifications and back up for them, though by posts, it seems I know. I am by my own nature not an incisive arguer, though I did get an A in logic (news to all here) and watch a lot of posts with bemusement.

I'm over bemusement with Agrote's spawn,
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:35 pm
Shocked
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:35 pm
I just think it's really unlikely.
Anyway, the modarators will sort all that out. It's not our buisiness.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:37 pm
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
That they can't help feeling sexually attracted to children, therefore it's not inherently wrong.

If we were having a 'is murder wrong' discussion I doubt we would all start accusing each other of being murderers, why is this different?
That would depend on whether or not one or two of us was advocating murder as if it were no more abnormal than gay sex, now wouldn't it?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:40 pm
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
I just think it's really unlikely.
Anyway, the modarators will sort all that out. It's not our buisiness.
Actually, it's not their business. The Mods don't read PMs. If you were a pedophile looking for fellow sickos to exchange your heinous goods; how would you cover your tracks?
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:41 pm
Oooooooooh, that was good. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
The Pentacle Queen
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:46 pm
I don't know. I just think its a shame we can't debate on here, this is what this forum is for.
Maybe we should start another thread, that way I might get some PMs so I can recruit some sickos and get my mitts on some heinous goods.
Haha. Do you get woman paeodos?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:46 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
I just think it's really unlikely.
Anyway, the modarators will sort all that out. It's not our buisiness.
Actually, it's not their business. The Mods don't read PMs. If you were a pedophile looking for fellow sickos to exchange your heinous goods; how would you cover your tracks?


If Agrote or Hawkeye are sending TOS breaking PMs, these can be reported just as posts can...there is a report button on them.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:46 pm
RH, did you take somehow that that I am for Agrote's pov? If you did, you're wildly wrong. I'll have to go back and see what I might have said that might have intimated that, or, if not, from which you do a take.

I'm not interested in some kind of repulsion vying.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:50 pm
we crossposted Osso, it was meant for PQ
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:50 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Quoting Hawk,

Those who dismiss Agrote and his questions as the unimportant ramblings of a pedophile are the ignorant ones here. These kinds of questions are being asked by respectable people, are being written about in the popular press, and are in the courts. Apologies to Agrote are in order.



I don't know, for sure, of any of Agrote's personal takes and their ramifications and back up for them, though by posts, it seems I know. I am by my own nature not an incisive arguer, though I did get an A in logic (news to all here) and watch a lot of posts with bemusement.


Did anyone take this as a positive re Agrote? Christ, if any of you thought so, I'm gone.
I'm over bemusement with Agrote's spawn,
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:50 pm
dlowan wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
I just think it's really unlikely.
Anyway, the modarators will sort all that out. It's not our buisiness.
Actually, it's not their business. The Mods don't read PMs. If you were a pedophile looking for fellow sickos to exchange your heinous goods; how would you cover your tracks?


If Agrote or Hawkeye are sending TOS breaking PMs, these can be reported just as posts can...there is a report button on them.
Laughing Which do you suppose would report the other (if that were the case, I obviously couldn't know). Who would know to report if it were a fishing expedition looking for some anonymous sicko? How do you suppose the sickos locate each other initially?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:53 pm
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
I don't know. I just think its a shame we can't debate on here, this is what this forum is for.
Maybe we should start another thread, that way I might get some PMs so I can recruit some sickos and get my mitts on some heinous goods.
Haha. Do you get woman paeodos?



There is an ongoing debate on this thread...I don't know what you mean.

Some are making personal accusations against Agrote, some are not, just as on any other thread.

I am puzzled as to WHY there is still debate going on, ss Agrote conceded pages ago that his thesis is wrong (he admitted harm to abuse victims from knowing that men were jerking off in enjoyment of their violation...which is SOMETHING, even though he fails to concede other points against his thesis)...although he appeared to have forgotten this concession, as he seems to be back defending enjoyment of child abuse again....but dragging itself on it is.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:56 pm
OK, RH, breathes.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 07:57 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
dlowan wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
The Pentacle Queen wrote:
I just think it's really unlikely.
Anyway, the modarators will sort all that out. It's not our buisiness.
Actually, it's not their business. The Mods don't read PMs. If you were a pedophile looking for fellow sickos to exchange your heinous goods; how would you cover your tracks?


If Agrote or Hawkeye are sending TOS breaking PMs, these can be reported just as posts can...there is a report button on them.
Laughing Which do you suppose would report the other (if that were the case, I obviously couldn't know). Who would know to report if it were a fishing expedition looking for some anonymous sicko? How do you suppose the sickos locate each other initially?



I thought you suspected (and assumed you had some reason to do so if you were raising it as an issue....it appears this assumption was wrong) that they were attempting to influence others via PM, and if so, and if their actions were deemed illegal, offensive, or violated TOS in some way, I simply wished anyone new to the board to know that they COULD discuss their concerns with the Mods.


I think we need to be very careful about suggesting in any way that such conduct is occurring, by the way.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Fri 27 Jun, 2008 08:04 pm
dlowan wrote:
I thought you suspected (and assumed you had some reason to do so) that they were attempting to influence others via PM, and if so, and if their actions were deemed illegal, offensive, or violated TOS in some way, I simply wished anyone new to the board to know that they COULD discuss their concerns with the Mods.
Good of you to point that out, even though that isn't what I was suggesting. I would think the sickos would behave much like drug users… only more cautious still. M.O. identify each other with easily deniable cross purposes while probing for interest as they move closer to mutual understanding, culminating in acceptance into the sick subculture. Prior to this thread; it hadn't occurred to me that A2K could be used for that purpose… and the thought sickens me.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/09/2025 at 04:41:34