Green Witch wrote:Only seven dead? When are the Japanese going to learn that guns are much more efficient for this sort of thing. And if the guy was up in a tower he would still be picking people off.
That is inaccurate.
When this has happened, using gunfire,
typically 7 or fewer victims resulted.
This number of victims wud be
less,
if the ambient population (including the victims)
were armed with defensive handguns, in which case,
the perp wud not last more than a few seconds.
However, if the perp is the only fellow with a gun, or in this case: a sword,
he can have a long time ( he can even
RE-LOAD ) acting as a wolf in a chicken coop.
The moral of the story is: its better to
HAVE a defensive gun and
not NEED it,
than to NEED a defensive gun and not
HAVE it.
Its the same as having health insurance.
Wud someone
lament and
bemoan having health insurance if he does
NOT get a heart attack ??
David