Re: asbestos exposure cases
tintin wrote:Citing the legal precedent set by asbestos exposure cases, a state judge agreed to combine a series of workplace disability cases involving repetitive stress injuries to the hands and wrists. The judge's decision to consolidate hundreds of suits by data entry workers, word processors, newspaper employees, and other workers who use computers into one case is likely to prove detrimental for the computer manufacturing companies being sued, notwithstanding the defense's argument that the cases should not be combined because of the different individuals and workplaces involved
I don't understand those bold colored text.
1. what is "asbestos exposure cases" ?
2. what is "workplace disability cases" ?
that entire sentence looks complex .
i could not follow up.
can anybody simplify it?
thanks
1. Legal cases in relation to claims for compensation by people made ill by exposure to asbestos (most commonly such cases relate to a fatal lung cancer called mesothilioma).
2. Legal cases in relation to claims for compensation by people with injuries suffered at work, which have left them with ongoing disabilities.
The whole shebang:
A judge is hearing cases in relation to compensation for people involved in work where they need to use keyboards a lot.
The workers' legal people are saying that the workers have suffered disability because of the repetitive nature of their work....(ie repetition strain injury).
The judge has decided to allow the workers to have their case argued en masse (that is, to have a case argued on behalf of all of them...we call that a class action in Australia) rather than to make each individual go to court separately.
In doing this, the judge is following a precedent set by judges allowing workers who suffer from health problems related to asbestos exposure to do the same.
(You know about the importance of precedent in the legal system?)
This will be detrimental to the computer companies being sued because it is better for them if each case has to be argued separately.