Physical property versus Information
This discussion is focussed on information as opposed to physical property. The identification of rightful ownership of information is different from that of physical property.
fishin wrote:Is there a "bright-line" that can be drawn to distingish when something is "private" and government should be kept out?
Should? The government "should' be kept out of everything unless you authorize it to meddle in your affairs.
Joe Nation wrote:And please ask any budding artist today how he intends to protect his musical creations from theft,
Easy: by keeping his creations to himself.
I certainly do not think that any artist has a right to force all tax-payers to support his legal claims of "theft" in a court of law.
Joe Nation wrote: you'll get a shrug because this society has decided that the idea of ownership rights disappeared with the idea that you had any kind of private life.
I believe a better description would be that "society" -- whoever that is -- has stopped trying to protect things which physically can not be protected.
fishin wrote:But what I meant was for yourself - what about you personally? What is "private" vs. what is "public" for YOU?
The question is technically invalid.
Information is "public" if other people know it. Similarly, information is "private" if you do not share it.
Joe Nation wrote:I am still a little embarrassed at how much we ask people to expose to us..
I presume it is safe to say that you are not forcing people to disclose information.