1
   

USA Ranks 22nd on Stable, Prosperous Countries List

 
 
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:08 pm
A ranking of the world's countries for stability and prosperity places the United States in the 22nd spot:

1. Vatican 99
2. Sweden 99
3. Luxembourg 99
4. Monaco 98
5. Gibraltar 98
6. San Marino 98
7. Liechtenstein 97
8. United Kingdom 97
9. The Netherlands 97
10. Irish Republic 97
11 New Zealand
12 Denmark
13 Austria
14 Andorra
15 Germany
16 Iceland
17 Switzerland
18 Portugal
19 Australia
20 Norway
21 Malta
22 France
23 Canada
24 USA
25 Belgium
26 Spain
27 Italy
28 Japan
29 Finland
30 Czech Rep
Source: Times online




Quote:
From The Times
March 25, 2008


Britain is world's 7th most stable and prosperous nation

Michael Evans, Defence Editor

The United Kingdom has been ranked as one of the most stable and prosperous countries in the world, beating the United States, France and even Switzerland in a global assessment of every nation's achievements and standards.

A one-year investigation and analysis of 235 countries and dependent territories has put the UK joint seventh in the premier league of nations. The top ten comprise also the Vatican, Sweden, Luxembourg, Monaco, Gibraltar, San Marino, Liechtenstein, the Netherlands and the Irish Republic.

The US lies 22nd and Switzerland, normally associated with wealth and untouchable stability, is rated 17th, losing points in the assessment of its social achievements.

The bottom ten, surprisingly, do not include Iraq. They are listed as Gaza and the West Bank, Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan, Ivory Coast, Haiti, Zimbabwe, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo and the Central African Republic.

The UK received high marks despite the deployment of combat troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, the suicide bombings in London on July 7, 2005, the continuing threat from home-grown terrorists and the collapse of the Northern Rock bank.

The global check on every country recognised as an individual state or territory by the United Nations was carried out by Jane's Information Group and is published today.

Christian Le Mière, managing editor of Jane's Country Risk, which compiled the ratings, said: "The UK is a very stable country. But the top 20 or 30 countries are all stable. There are terrorist groups in the UK but there are effective security forces to deal with them. We took the July 7 bombings into account but the UK still came out very well."

He acknowledged that it was a little unfair to put the Vatican at the top because it did not face the sort of threats and economic pressures of other countries. But under the rating system, which took into account each nation's political structures, social and economic trends, military and security risks and external relations, the Vatican state scored an average of 99 out of 100. Sweden and Luxembourg were also rated 99, with the UK not far off, with an average of 97, but scoring 100 for its politics, economics and external relations.

Mr Le Mière said that the US had fallen down the scale, although it still scored an average of 93 out of 100, partly because of the proliferation of small arms owned by Americans and the threat to the population posed by the flow of drugs from across the Mexican border.

He explained that Iraq had managed to escape the ignominy of being in the bottom ten because, despite "extremely high levels of violence", it had a "relatively stable Government" that controlled a significant area of the country and had good economic prospects. "Unlike Afghanistan, where - despite the presence of more than 40,000 foreign troops - the Government exercises poor control over large parts of the country and where 50 per cent of the economy is dependent on the opium trade," he said.

Mr Le Mière gave warning of worrying trends in Africa where, he said, there was likely to be a struggle for resources. He added that it was the first time that a rating system for countries had been carried out on such a grand scale. The Jane's system differed from government assessments of country risk because it was based entirely on objective analysis, "with no politicisation of the intelligence", he said.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 766 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:12 pm
Ok, now that France just became a province of the US..


(22, v'là les flics!)
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:17 pm
Francis wrote:
Ok, now that France just became a province of the US..


(22, v'là les flics!)


The number 22 to 24 are equal, I found out via other sources.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:25 pm
So Vietnam is first. So what?



Smile


seriously what does it measure? or rather what measures are taken to rank countries?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Mar, 2008 02:51 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:

seriously what does it measure? or rather what measures are taken to rank countries?


It isn't online yet on Jane's Information Group's website.
According to the source below: Mr. Le Miere said his firm's analysts rate a country's vulnerability by measuring 24 factors across five broad categories ?- politics, society, economy, military-security and external threats.

The Washington Times anylyses this report a bit differently:


Quote:
Study's rankings indicate a more-stable Iraq

By David R. Sands
March 25, 2008

Iraq does not even crack the top 20 in an authoritative new ranking of the world's most unstable places, to be released today by the London-based private intelligence firm Jane's Information Group.

The survey, an advance copy of which was provided to The Washington Times, rates the Palestinian territories as the world's most unstable country or territory, with Afghanistan, Haiti and seven African countries filling out the top 10.

Despite an insurgency and sectarian strife dating back to the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, Iraq is listed by Jane's risk analysts at 22nd among the world's 235 countries, territories and political entities, on par with countries such as Burundi and Nigeria.

"There's no doubt that Iraq right now has perhaps the world's most virulent insurgency within its borders, but the country has its strengths as well," said Christian Le Miere, managing editor of Jane's Country Risk, the journal that compiles the rankings.

"Despite its problems, the central government enjoys effective control of large sections of its territory, and the economy is doing relatively well in many sectors," he said. "Contrast that with, say, Afghanistan, where the central government is very weak, the drug trade is undermining the economy and the government cannot assert its will over warlords who run much of the hinterlands."

The Jane's survey differs from a number of other recent global rankings on the prospect for instability in Iraq.

The latest annual survey from Foreign Policy magazine and the Fund for Peace put Iraq second, behind only Sudan, among the world's failed states. A ranking by the University of Maryland's Center for International Development and Conflict Management listed Afghanistan and Iraq as the two countries at the highest risk for political instability.

Iraq's oil exports have begun to recover just as world prices are setting new records. Despite all its troubles, Iraq is looking at a massive budget surplus in the coming years as its seeks to finance the country's reconstruction, officials in Baghdad said yesterday.

Jane's, now owned by Colorado information company IHS Inc., is more than 100 years old and has long provided private intelligence services and risk analysis to clients on a private basis. This is the first time it has made its global instability rankings public.

Mr. Le Miere said his firm's analysts rate a country's vulnerability by measuring 24 factors across five broad categories ?- politics, society, economy, military-security and external threats.

"In some ways, it's very difficult to define what a 'failed state' actually is," he said. "We try to focus on objective factors that make a country more or less likely to be unstable."

The Palestinian territories in Gaza and the West Bank are particularly vulnerable for a number of factors, including a lack of border controls, a violent power struggle between rival Palestinian factions, crime and poor levels of public health.

Afghanistan comes in third, behind Somalia, where the central government again has little functional control, borders are unsupervised and public services almost nonexistent.

Pakistan is listed at No. 28, North Korea at No. 45 and Iran 69th in the Jane's list, though the company acknowledges that getting reliable data from a closed society such as North Korea makes the analysis more difficult.

Mr. Le Miere said some countries that have caused U.S. policy-makers concern score well on his firm's analysis. The small Gulf states, including Qatar, Kuwait and Oman, rank high in a number of stability factors in the Jane's survey, ahead of many central and Eastern European countries.

At the top of the Jane's spectrum, Vatican City, the papal enclave in Rome, is listed as the most stable place on earth, followed by Sweden and Luxembourg.

The United States rates 22nd from the top, tied with Canada in the survey, with the "porosity" of American borders and the prevalence of guns keeping the United States from a higher score.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » USA Ranks 22nd on Stable, Prosperous Countries List
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/13/2026 at 08:07:53