0
   

Black Theology?

 
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Mar, 2008 10:12 am
Green Witch wrote:
Do we have to pick? I like both versions:


I might pay to see them both naked..
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Mar, 2008 10:13 am
They could pay me first and then you could pay them.
Arrow
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Mar, 2008 04:59 pm
Re: Black Theology?
snood wrote:
real life wrote:
Miller wrote:
Why should there be "Black Theology"?

Is God black?


The 'Black Theology' championed by James Cone (mentioned by Obama's pastor Jeremiah Wright as one of his foundational influences for preaching a 'Black Values System' ) is one in which God is only accepted if He supports killing whites.

Quote:
Barack Obama's suddenly radioactive pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has defended himself against charges of anti-Americanism and racism by referring to his foundational philosophy, the "black liberation theology" of scholars such as James Cone, who regard Jesus Christ as a "black messiah" and blacks as "the chosen people" who will only accept a god who assists their aim of destroying the "white enemy."

"If God is not for us and against white people," writes Cone, "then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community."................

..............Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community
... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

from http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59230


real life, do you think the depiction of Jesus down through time a person with the characteristics of an anglo/European is indicative of an ethnocentrism within the origins of contemporary Christianity? If so, then how do you reconcile that ethnocentricity with the gospel that makes all equal in Jesus - Jew, Greek, male, female, slave and free? If not, then why hasn't Jesus been depicted in a way that is more probably how he looked, being Hebrew - broader nose, darker skin, kinkier hair?


What relevance does Jesus physical appearance have when discussing whether He would approve a theology which teaches the destruction of whites?

Artistic representations of Christ are meaningless, IMHO, in this discussion.

I couldn't care less how brown His skin was or wasn't.

Does that give ANYbody an excuse to use Christian theology to kill those that don't look like them?

You may say, 'well, many years ago white Europeans HAVE misused theology to support some awful things...........'

Did your parents tell you that two wrongs don't make a right?

Are you willing to defend the teaching of hate and racism that Obama has submitted himself and his children to for 20 years?

Obama's pastor and mentor of 20 years, Dr Wright , preaches a 'Black Value System' based on the work of James Cone and others. Cone writes :
Quote:
The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples. Either God is identified with the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God's experience, or God is a God of racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29

Quote:
"It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man's strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it...But the charge of black racism cannot be reconciled with the facts. While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29


More on Obama's church:

Quote:
JERUSALEM - Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church reprinted a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group's official charter - which calls for the murder of Jews - to America's Declaration of Independence.

The Hamas piece was published on the "Pastor's Page" of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks landed Obama in hot water, prompting the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech earlier this week.

Hamas, responsible for scores of shootings, suicide bombings and rocket launchings against civilian population centers, is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.

The revelation follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

In his July 22, 2007, church bulletin, Wright reprinted an article by Mousa Abu Marzook, identified in the newsletter as a "deputy of the political bureau of Hamas." A photo image of the newsletter was captured and posted today by the business blog BizzyBlog. The Hamas piece was first published by the Los Angeles Times, garnering the newspaper much criticism.

According to senior Israeli security officials, Marzook, who resides in Syria alongside Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshaal, is considered the "brains" behind Hamas, designing much of the terror group's policies and ideology. Israel possesses what it says is a large volume of specific evidence that Marzook has been directly involved in calling for or planning scores of Hamas terrorist offensives, including deadly suicide bombings. He was also accused of attempting to set up a Hamas network in the U.S.

Marzook's original piece was titled, "Hamas' stand" but was re-titled "A Fresh View of the Palestinian Struggle" by Obama's church newsletter. The newsletter also referred to Hamas as the "Islamic Resistance Movement................
from http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59456
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Mar, 2008 05:00 pm
shewolfnm wrote:
Green Witch wrote:
Do we have to pick? I like both versions:


I might pay to see them both naked..


yeah.... like ....with your immortal soul..... Laughing
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Mar, 2008 08:07 pm
Re: Black Theology?
real life wrote:
snood wrote:
real life wrote:
Miller wrote:
Why should there be "Black Theology"?

Is God black?


The 'Black Theology' championed by James Cone (mentioned by Obama's pastor Jeremiah Wright as one of his foundational influences for preaching a 'Black Values System' ) is one in which God is only accepted if He supports killing whites.

Quote:
Barack Obama's suddenly radioactive pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has defended himself against charges of anti-Americanism and racism by referring to his foundational philosophy, the "black liberation theology" of scholars such as James Cone, who regard Jesus Christ as a "black messiah" and blacks as "the chosen people" who will only accept a god who assists their aim of destroying the "white enemy."

"If God is not for us and against white people," writes Cone, "then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community."................

..............Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community
... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

from http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59230


real life, do you think the depiction of Jesus down through time a person with the characteristics of an anglo/European is indicative of an ethnocentrism within the origins of contemporary Christianity? If so, then how do you reconcile that ethnocentricity with the gospel that makes all equal in Jesus - Jew, Greek, male, female, slave and free? If not, then why hasn't Jesus been depicted in a way that is more probably how he looked, being Hebrew - broader nose, darker skin, kinkier hair?


What relevance does Jesus physical appearance have when discussing whether He would approve a theology which teaches the destruction of whites?

Artistic representations of Christ are meaningless, IMHO, in this discussion.

I couldn't care less how brown His skin was or wasn't.

Does that give ANYbody an excuse to use Christian theology to kill those that don't look like them?

You may say, 'well, many years ago white Europeans HAVE misused theology to support some awful things...........'

Did your parents tell you that two wrongs don't make a right?

Are you willing to defend the teaching of hate and racism that Obama has submitted himself and his children to for 20 years?

Obama's pastor and mentor of 20 years, Dr Wright , preaches a 'Black Value System' based on the work of James Cone and others. Cone writes :
Quote:
The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples. Either God is identified with the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God's experience, or God is a God of racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29

Quote:
"It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man's strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it...But the charge of black racism cannot be reconciled with the facts. While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29


More on Obama's church:

Quote:
JERUSALEM - Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church reprinted a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group's official charter - which calls for the murder of Jews - to America's Declaration of Independence.

The Hamas piece was published on the "Pastor's Page" of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks landed Obama in hot water, prompting the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech earlier this week.

Hamas, responsible for scores of shootings, suicide bombings and rocket launchings against civilian population centers, is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.

The revelation follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

In his July 22, 2007, church bulletin, Wright reprinted an article by Mousa Abu Marzook, identified in the newsletter as a "deputy of the political bureau of Hamas." A photo image of the newsletter was captured and posted today by the business blog BizzyBlog. The Hamas piece was first published by the Los Angeles Times, garnering the newspaper much criticism.

According to senior Israeli security officials, Marzook, who resides in Syria alongside Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshaal, is considered the "brains" behind Hamas, designing much of the terror group's policies and ideology. Israel possesses what it says is a large volume of specific evidence that Marzook has been directly involved in calling for or planning scores of Hamas terrorist offensives, including deadly suicide bombings. He was also accused of attempting to set up a Hamas network in the U.S.

Marzook's original piece was titled, "Hamas' stand" but was re-titled "A Fresh View of the Palestinian Struggle" by Obama's church newsletter. The newsletter also referred to Hamas as the "Islamic Resistance Movement................
from http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59456



I see you deigned to answer my questions. What it "has to do" with anything is that this thread is titled "Black Theology", and attempts to tie the worst possible things Wright has said to some "black" kind of christianity - an ugly, worthless endeavor. So, I asked a question that delves into the idea of there being a "white" kind of christianity - equally distasteful, and ultimately moot. Your issues prevent you from seeing any point that doesn't bash Obama.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 06:40 am
Re: Black Theology?
snood wrote:
real life wrote:
snood wrote:
real life wrote:
Miller wrote:
Why should there be "Black Theology"?

Is God black?


The 'Black Theology' championed by James Cone (mentioned by Obama's pastor Jeremiah Wright as one of his foundational influences for preaching a 'Black Values System' ) is one in which God is only accepted if He supports killing whites.

Quote:
Barack Obama's suddenly radioactive pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has defended himself against charges of anti-Americanism and racism by referring to his foundational philosophy, the "black liberation theology" of scholars such as James Cone, who regard Jesus Christ as a "black messiah" and blacks as "the chosen people" who will only accept a god who assists their aim of destroying the "white enemy."

"If God is not for us and against white people," writes Cone, "then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community."................

..............Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community
... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

from http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59230


real life, do you think the depiction of Jesus down through time a person with the characteristics of an anglo/European is indicative of an ethnocentrism within the origins of contemporary Christianity? If so, then how do you reconcile that ethnocentricity with the gospel that makes all equal in Jesus - Jew, Greek, male, female, slave and free? If not, then why hasn't Jesus been depicted in a way that is more probably how he looked, being Hebrew - broader nose, darker skin, kinkier hair?


What relevance does Jesus physical appearance have when discussing whether He would approve a theology which teaches the destruction of whites?

Artistic representations of Christ are meaningless, IMHO, in this discussion.

I couldn't care less how brown His skin was or wasn't.

Does that give ANYbody an excuse to use Christian theology to kill those that don't look like them?

You may say, 'well, many years ago white Europeans HAVE misused theology to support some awful things...........'

Did your parents tell you that two wrongs don't make a right?

Are you willing to defend the teaching of hate and racism that Obama has submitted himself and his children to for 20 years?

Obama's pastor and mentor of 20 years, Dr Wright , preaches a 'Black Value System' based on the work of James Cone and others. Cone writes :
Quote:
The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples. Either God is identified with the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God's experience, or God is a God of racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29

Quote:
"It is important to make a further distinction here among black hatred, black racism, and Black Power. Black hatred is the black man's strong aversion to white society. No black man living in white America can escape it...But the charge of black racism cannot be reconciled with the facts. While it is true that blacks do hate whites, black hatred is not racism
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cone_%28theologian%29


More on Obama's church:

Quote:
JERUSALEM - Sen. Barack Obama's Chicago church reprinted a manifesto by Hamas that defended terrorism as legitimate resistance, refused to recognize the right of Israel to exist and compared the terror group's official charter - which calls for the murder of Jews - to America's Declaration of Independence.

The Hamas piece was published on the "Pastor's Page" of the Trinity United Church of Christ newsletter reserved for Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., whose anti-American, anti-Israel remarks landed Obama in hot water, prompting the presidential candidate to deliver a major race speech earlier this week.

Hamas, responsible for scores of shootings, suicide bombings and rocket launchings against civilian population centers, is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.

The revelation follows a recent WND article quoting Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group.

In his July 22, 2007, church bulletin, Wright reprinted an article by Mousa Abu Marzook, identified in the newsletter as a "deputy of the political bureau of Hamas." A photo image of the newsletter was captured and posted today by the business blog BizzyBlog. The Hamas piece was first published by the Los Angeles Times, garnering the newspaper much criticism.

According to senior Israeli security officials, Marzook, who resides in Syria alongside Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshaal, is considered the "brains" behind Hamas, designing much of the terror group's policies and ideology. Israel possesses what it says is a large volume of specific evidence that Marzook has been directly involved in calling for or planning scores of Hamas terrorist offensives, including deadly suicide bombings. He was also accused of attempting to set up a Hamas network in the U.S.

Marzook's original piece was titled, "Hamas' stand" but was re-titled "A Fresh View of the Palestinian Struggle" by Obama's church newsletter. The newsletter also referred to Hamas as the "Islamic Resistance Movement................
from http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59456



I see you deigned to answer my questions. What it "has to do" with anything is that this thread is titled "Black Theology", and attempts to tie the worst possible things Wright has said to some "black" kind of christianity - an ugly, worthless endeavor. So, I asked a question that delves into the idea of there being a "white" kind of christianity - equally distasteful, and ultimately moot. Your issues prevent you from seeing any point that doesn't bash Obama.


The 'ugly worthless endeavor' of establishing a 'black theology' or 'black Christianity' is what Wright would tell you that he has given his whole life to try to do.

Wright's not bashful about admitting it, why are you hesitant to acknowledge it?

Obama has submitted himself and his children to 20 years of teaching at a racist church, that preaches a 'black value system'.

The leading lights of the 'black liberation theology' movement, such as Cone and Wright, are not agreeing with you that the point is moot.

Far from it. Read their writings and listen to their sermons, and you will see how serious they are about it.

Your attempt to equate an artist painting Jesus as white with the black theologian who urges the destruction of the 'white enemy' using 'any means possible' is a very poor comparison, don't you think?
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 01:12 pm
"It is most commonly argued that Jesus was probably of Middle Eastern descent because of the geographic location of the events described in the Gospels, and, among some modern Christian scholars, the genealogy ascribed to him."

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/bf/RFJesus.jpg/180px-RFJesus.jpgA team of forensic scientists recently attempted to recreate what Jesus may have looked like based on human remains from the area where and time period when Jesus is believed to have existed.

"In more recent times the fact that the Middle East was a meeting point of cultures and races has led to suggestions that Jesus may have been African or Arabian. The ancient Near East was a cultural crossroad, and the only land route out of Africa, where that continent physically joins the Eurasian landmass."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Jesus
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 06:10 pm
Yeah, interesting as heck that Jesus may have actually looked like he could have the middle name Mohamad.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 06:24 pm
Well, I know one thing for sure......Theres no way in hell I could convince anybody Jesus was a mexican.

Wait a minute?.....nope, that wont fly.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 06:28 pm
Laughing

It'd go over big in San Antone.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 06:39 pm
Amigo wrote:
Well, I know one thing for sure......Theres no way in hell I could convince anybody Jesus was a mexican.

Wait a minute?.....nope, that wont fly.


I beg to differ:

http://a883.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/39/s_4628fd42bbcd883aea15e15d0f88e962.jpg
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 07:14 pm
I hade a roomate in college that looked just like that.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 10:57 pm
snood wrote:
Yeah, interesting as heck that Jesus may have actually looked like he could have the middle name Mohamad.


Interesting?

Maybe, but hardly news. Anybody who reads the Bible knows that Jesus was Jewish.

And it's irrelevant to the current discussion of Obama's racist church teaching a 'Black Value system' and 'Black Liberation Theology' .

It's not their artwork that is objected to.

But I guess you'd rather discuss ANYTHING other than that.

So , how 'bout those pictures of angels with long blond hair? Ain't that interesting, snood?

Hoo wee. I'm fascinated by it.

Got any pics of blond angels?

I'd like to see more of 'em.

Forget that 'Present ' Obama, who wants to be your President and mine, submitted himself and his children to 20 years of racist teaching, and thinks you're dumb enough to ignore it and pretend that he just found out about Wright's views a few days ago.

Let's talk about angels instead.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Mar, 2008 11:42 pm
Your rants and constant harangues don't exactly put you in the catbird seat to dictate what's "relevant" here, "real life".

But that's okay, because your bitterness and dissembling don't make you the go-to authority on being christian either, but you sure don't let that stop your longwinded blather.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 07:51 am
Sorry snood.

The thread is about 'Black Theology'.

Unless one derives their theology from a painting or other artwork, I don't see how your point about Euro-artistic representations of Jesus is really very relevant.

It may be interesting to you.

And I didn't deny that.

But 'Black Theology' doesn't come from art , does it?

Do you support the 'Black Liberation Theology' as articulated by James Cone, Jeremiah Wright, and others?

Why or why not?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 07:56 am
You know real life old buddy, it might give you a touch of humanity and humility if you could admit there are simply some things you don't understand...
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 03:51 pm
There's plenty of things I don't understand , snood.

Like how Obama expects us to believe that he is 'just now', after listening to Jeremiah Wright for 20 years, discovering that his long-time pastor is a racist.

Like how Obama expects us to accept his candidacy as one 'elevating' the dialogue on race, when he himself has tolerated some of the worst race-baiting we've heard in a long time, and financially supported it, for 20 years.

Like how the Democratic party expects voters to turn a deaf ear to 20 years of racist remarks because they are uttered by a black man instead of a white man.

Yeah, there's a lot I don't understand. But I'll muddle through.

Thanks for the concern though.

There are a lot of black candidates qualified for the Presidency.

Obama isn't one of them, IMHO. His own actions (or actually his inaction, his failure to leave Trinity Church 19 years and 11 months ago) disqualify him.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 05:47 pm
I understand that since these things you say disqualify him in your opinion, you won't be supporting him, and encourage others not to, as well. done. Gotcha.

It's the other dozens of posts where you keep repeating a version of the above that make me ask about your motive.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 06:04 pm
Because god once told him to go out and multiply, and therefore he does...over and over again in the hope that the seeds will impregnant someone with doubts.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Mar, 2008 10:48 pm
snood wrote:
I understand that since these things you say disqualify him in your opinion, you won't be supporting him, and encourage others not to, as well. done. Gotcha.

It's the other dozens of posts where you keep repeating a version of the above that make me ask about your motive.


Still wondering whether you support the 'Black Liberation Theology' preached by Jeremiah Wright and James Cone.

Quote:
The vision statement of Trinity United Church of Christ is based upon the systematized liberation theology that started in 1969 with the publication of Dr. James Cone's book, Black Power and Black Theology.
from http://www.tucc.org/talking_points.htm

Quote:
The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples.
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hal_Cone

Quote:
Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community. . . . Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hal_Cone



Are you simply afraid to criticize them because they are black?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Black Theology?
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 06:20:16