username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Dec, 2005 11:28 pm
PARENTS

Practically any RECENT entry neglects tremendous sagacity.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 06:31 am
RECENT.

Regretting every courtesan's ENTICEMENTS not tried.
0 Replies
 
OnTheFritz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 06:48 am
ENTICEMENTS

Elvira's nursing, tubby infant called Elmer's MANIACAL, envious need to suckle.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 07:46 am
MANIACAL



METHUSELAH asked nahum if aardvarks could accept leprechauns.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 08:31 am
METHUSELAH.

Miranda entered Tommy's HEADQUARTERS using servant's entrance looking appropriately humble.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 08:55 am
HEADQUARTERS


having eaten a delicious quaintly unattractive AARDVARK rapunzel triumphed, ending rampant starvation.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 09:43 am
AARDVARK.

An acute rectal DISTEMPER vivifies a rusty khazi.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 09:58 am
DISTEMPER

Diabolical INSURGENTS spray tommy-guns, endlessly missing perfect egocentric ruffians.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:07 am
INSURGENTS

Incredibly naive submissions undermine recent game excellence notwithstanding tropical SAFARIS.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:13 am
SAFARIS

Spendius and fannies acknowledge rhetoric iterate
SUPEREROGATION.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:23 am
SUPEREROGATION.

Some unctuous parties ever respond excessively requiring overlongingly gestated acronyms to INHIBIT ordinary nonsense.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:26 am
INHIBIT

Interesting notion he infers BY intellectual tomfoolery
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:27 am
Beware YODELERS.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:29 am
You spelt YODELLERS incorrectly.

Your line is forfeit FF
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:33 am
According to Merriam-Webster, I spelled it correctly. :wink:

The word is...

YODELERS
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:39 am
Merriam Webster is incorrect then.

It is spelt YODELLERS.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:45 am
YODELLERS

Your only defence epitomises LOQUACIOUS ladies eternally rabbiting.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 11:10 am
LOQUACIOUS.

Leave out querulous,underhanded accusations concerning inhabitant's outrages unless SERIOUS.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 11:14 am
SERIOUS

Some error reports indicate one user's STONED.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 11:35 am
STONED


SYLVIA thought only needy eels dieted.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

WHAT'S NEXT? - Discussion by Rod3
The obscure links between artists thread - Discussion by hingehead
Famous People Name Game - Discussion by Mame
Three Truths and a Lie. - Discussion by Sofia
Historical Facts - Discussion by jcboy
Presidential word challenge help, please. - Question by Daisy Ryder
Famous Author - Question by sophocles
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Acronym Game
  3. » Page 747
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 11:31:29