Reply Sat 10 Nov, 2007 08:58 pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSN1040657120071111?pageNumber=2


In my life's melieu, saying Shut up! was always worse than fack off.

But interrupting is rude too.

How do you come down on this episode? Can you separate your opinion about shut up and interrupting from your pov on the individuals involved? Should you?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,368 • Replies: 22
No top replies

 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 07:09 am
Diplomacy isn't what it never was.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 07:31 am
Chavez could do much more good with his mouth shut. The tragedy is that, when he opens his mouth, he exposes himself to be a kind of smirky faced jerk.


Joe(We already have one of those. Thank you very mush)Nation
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 08:47 am
Aznar defied over 90% of his people by supporting Bushie's invasion of Iraq. He played a large role in unjust and unneeded mass murder. Chavez told it like it is which is kind of verbotten in Bushie World.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 09:15 am
Well.

Been looking for snippets on YouTube. First impression was that Chavez was really annoying, and I kind of sympathized with the king.

Found this 3 minute clip here. Have to say that Zapatero is doing a really, really good job at not getting annoyed with Chavez's interruptions and lecturing him about respect and dialogue on an international level. Marvellous. Chavez looks like the school bully after being told off by the teacher.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 09:27 am
blueflame1 wrote:
Aznar defied over 90% of his people by supporting Bushie's invasion of Iraq. He played a large role in unjust and unneeded mass murder. Chavez told it like it is which is kind of verbotten in Bushie World.


Zapatero is the leader of the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party. Not exactly "Bushie World." Zapatero criticized Aznar harshly for Spain's engagement in Iraq, and stated that he regarded any action against Saddam Hussein's regime as illegal.

That even he defends Aznar against Chavez's tirades should really give you some perspective...
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 09:49 am
Can someone give a summary of the dialogue in english for me?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 10:35 am
old europe wrote:
Well.

Been looking for snippets on YouTube. First impression was that Chavez was really annoying, and I kind of sympathized with the king.

Found this 3 minute clip here. Have to say that Zapatero is doing a really, really good job at not getting annoyed with Chavez's interruptions and lecturing him about respect and dialogue on an international level. Marvellous. Chavez looks like the school bully after being told off by the teacher.


Cannot disagree with a single thing said here, OE.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 10:49 am
I wish we could have someone of Zapatero's statue in our Senate ranks.
We have plenty of Chavez characters...*sigh*
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 11:05 am
Thanks, old europe, that helped..
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 11:40 am
old europe, Zapatero has been great. He's no Azner. I'd be willing to bet that he and the overwhelming majority of Spaniards agree with Chavez about Azner. In this time with over a million dead Iraqis in an unjust war and with a real possibility of escalation into WW3 as Bushie has mentioned heaven forbid that anyone call a mass murderer a mass murderer. That just aint diplomatic. Azner, Blair, Bushie all belong in prison.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 01:41 pm
littlek wrote:
Can someone give a summary of the dialogue in english for me?


Apologies for any unintelligibleness. I wrote it off the cuff (which took more than an hour).

I merely wanted, President Bachelet, to make a statement in response to the pronouncements made by the President of Venezuela, President Hugo Chavez, regarding the ex-President of the government of Spain, Mr. Aznar. I want to express, President Hugo Chavez, that we are at an Assembly in which there are democratic governments, who represent their citizens in an Iberian-American community which has as one of it's principles respect. Respect. It's possible to be in a position ideologically antipodal, and I am not one who is close to the ideas of Aznar, but he was elected by the people of Spain, and I demand . . .

(Chavez' inaudible interruptions)

I demand . . .

(Chavez' inaudible interruptions)

(The King of Spain, "why don't you shut up?")

I demand that respect .

(Chavez continues inaudibly)

President Hugo Chavez, I believe there is an essence, and a principle in discourse, and that is that to respect, and to be respected, we must procure to not be discredited. One can radically disagree with the ideas, denounce actions, without discrediting ourselves.

(Chavez' inaudible reply)

. . . Very well. What I want to stress is that it is a good form within which to work, understand, on behalf of our nations, for our nations, that we as democratic representatives respect each other. And I petition, President Bachelet, I petition that that be a norm of conduct in a forum that represents the people, that we respect one and all, our leaders, all our governors, and ex-governors of the countries that form this community. I believe it is a good principle. And I would, fervently I would, I fervently would that that be a code of conduct because form begets actions, and it is possible to radically disagree with, and all the while having respect for others. That is a principle upon which one will then be respected by others. And I am sure that this Assembly and all Latin Americans would that all of the democratic leaders that are here today in representation of the people be respected, today and always. (applause)

It's as if he were teaching manners to a petulant child who was heretofore oblivious to the concept.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 01:46 pm
InfraBlue wrote:
littlek wrote:
Can someone give a summary of the dialogue in english for me?


Apologies for any unintelligibleness. I wrote it off the cuff (which took more than an hour).

I merely wanted, President Bachelet, to make a statement, in response to the pronouncements made by the President of Venezuela, President Hugo Chavez, regarding the ex-President of the government of Spain, Mr. Aznar, I want to express, President Hugo Chavez, that we are at an Assembly in which there are democratic governments, who represent their citizens in an Iberian-American community which has as one of it's principles respect. Respect. It's possible to be in a position ideologically antipodal, and I am not one who is close to the ideas of Aznar, but he was elected by the people of Spain, and I demand . . .

(Chavez' inaudible interruptions)

I demand . . .

(Chavez' inaudible interruptions)

(The King of Spain, "why don't you shut up?")

I demand that respect .

(Chavez continues inaudibly)

President Hugo Chavez, I believe there is an essence, and a principle in discourse, and that is that to respect, and to be respected, we must procure to not be discredited. One can radically disagree with the ideas, denounce actions, without discrediting ourselves.

(Chavez' inaudible reply)

. . . Very well. What I want to stress is that it is a good form within which to work, understand, on behalf of our nations, for our nations, that we as democratic representatives respect each other. And I petition, President Bachelet, I petition that that be a norm of conduct in a forum that represents the people, that we respect one and all, our leaders, all our governors, and ex-governors of the countries that form this community. I believe it is a good principle. And I would, fervently I would, I fervently would that that be a code of conduct because form begets actions, and it is possible to radically disagree with, and all the while having respect for others. That is a principle upon which one will then be respected by others. And I am sure that this Assembly and all Latin Americans would that all of the democratic leaders that are here today in representation of the people be respected, today and always. (applause)

It's as if he were teaching manners to a petulant child who was heretofore oblivious to the concept.


Wow, infra! Thank you. I just wanted a synopsis and you gave me a transcript. I appreciate your time. So, the man speaking with the blonde woman behind his left shoulder was who? The president of Spain, I assume was to the speaker's left, yes?
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 02:01 pm
I wanted to try to convey the dignity and didacticism of what Zapatero was saying to Chavez, I thought a more direct translation would be better.

The guy doing most of the speaking is Spain President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. He was addressing Venezuela President Hugo Chávez. The older man immediately to Zapatero's left is Spain King don Juan Carlos.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 02:17 pm
Ah, they have a king and a president! Thanks, I definitely got a good sense of the conflict.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 02:21 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
old europe, Zapatero has been great. He's no Azner. I'd be willing to bet that he and the overwhelming majority of Spaniards agree with Chavez about Azner.


I doubt that very much...


Quote:
Spaniards back king for telling Chavez to shut up

MADRID (Reuters) - Even Spaniards normally critical of the royal family backed King Juan Carlos on Sunday for telling Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to shut up, but some voiced concerns the monarchy was getting too involved in politics.

The king's flare-up at the Ibero American summit followed days of criticism by leftist Latin American leaders of Spain's political and business influence in former colonies.

The spark came when Chavez repeatedly called Spain's former conservative prime minister, Jose Maria Aznar, a fascist.

Spain's left-leaning El Periodico de Catalunya newspaper, representing a region where anti-royal sentiment runs high, said on Sunday that Chavez's behaviour had been intolerable.

"Maybe it wasn't the best thing to say but the Monarch's fit shows just how much the Venezuelan's diatribe upset the Spanish," the newspaper said in its editorial.

Raising his hand at the fiery Venezuelan president, Juan Carlos had shouted "Why don't you shut up?"

In newspaper editorials, bars and Internet chatrooms, Spaniards said Chavez had been in the wrong.

"What the king said was completely justified, it's overdue," said bank worker Carlos Garcia, adding that he did not consider himself a supporter of either the royal family or Aznar.

...
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 04:26 pm
"One can radically disagree with the ideas, denounce actions, without discrediting ourselves. Calling mass murderers mass muderers is against protocol. So to hell with protocol. I cant see past the dead Iraqis none of whom should have died in this war that never should have been. I would say most Spaniards agree with Chavez by far just as 90% at least stood against the war only to be snubbed by Azner. A million dead later maybe they dont want a Venezualen leader telling them what they already know. But they do know.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 04:47 pm
They'd been discussing the war?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 04:51 pm
Nemmind, I read up.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Nov, 2007 06:09 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
One can radically disagree with the ideas, denounce actions, without discrediting ourselves. Calling mass murderers mass muderers is against protocol. So to hell with protocol.


But then again you're not a head of state or a diplomat. Theirs is a different protocol, of which Zapatero reminded Chávez.

Also, Chavez didn't call Aznar a mass murderer; he called him a fascist which is a bit of a stretch considering that Aznar was elected to office after all, and he relinquished power once Zapatero was elected into office. Yeah, going against the wishes of your constituency is a rather fascistic act, but it's rather rich that Chavez accuse Aznar of fascism for the one act of joining the Bush Administration's invasion and occupation of Iraq when Chavez has done, and is doing, many more fascistic things, like restricting the press, and changing Venezuela's constitution that would facilitate his dictatorship there.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Shut up, shut up already
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/16/2025 at 05:00:14