0
   

Down By Law

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Sep, 2007 04:22 pm
patiodog wrote:
But it was just one wee little bunny death? Confused



So...YOU go to a Chinese restaurant, and volunteer to be dinner.


You know there's too many dogs.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:23 pm
Aren't.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:30 pm
patiodog wrote:
Aren't.


Are.


Per unit of willing owners.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:40 pm
Then there's obviously a shortage of owners, an untapped market for supply. It only lacks a really effective advertising hook, like "Families with dogs are 72% less likely to suffer from terrorist attacks than families without dogs." And given the cosmopolitan targets of most terrorist attacks, it might even be true.

I'm joking. Sort of.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 05:42 am
patiodog wrote:
Then there's obviously a shortage of owners, an untapped market for supply. It only lacks a really effective advertising hook, like "Families with dogs are 72% less likely to suffer from terrorist attacks than families without dogs." And given the cosmopolitan targets of most terrorist attacks, it might even be true.

I'm joking. Sort of.


I'm laughing, sort of.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 06:29 am
I heard snickering coming from this thread.... again.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 06:51 am
Sorry, dad, we'll keep it down.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 07:48 am
I won't.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 02:23 pm
Will!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 04:01 pm
patiodog wrote:
Will!


WON'T!!!!
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 04:16 pm
WILL WILL WILL WILL WILL WILL WILL!!!!!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 04:27 pm
patiodog wrote:
WILL WILL WILL WILL WILL WILL WILLNOT!!!!!


Yep, you're right..I will not indeed.

You're SUCH a fast learner, wittle puppy!
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Dec, 2007 05:27 pm
Will snot.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 01:24 am
patiodog wrote:
Will snot.



Won't.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:26 am
(sigh) You're so immature.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:33 am
patiodog wrote:
(sigh) You're so immature.


Who mentioned snot first?

Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:37 am
Must've been the lord. He's the alfa romeo eat oh-my-god, ain't he?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:40 am
patiodog wrote:
Must've been the lord. He's the alfa romeo eat oh-my-god, ain't he?


It was thee, Dog. Thou saidest snot,
And all thy quibbles hide it not.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:42 am
But your query was who said it FIRST
Not latest, lastest, least, or worst.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Dec, 2007 07:46 am
patiodog wrote:
But your query was who said it FIRST
Not latest, lastest, least, or worst.



Equivocations of the fiend!!!
Thou skirtest now the pits of hell!
Thou knowest fully what I meaned,
Confess! Repent! The truth now tell!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Down By Law
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 12:55:51