Walter Hinteler wrote:oralloy wrote:
Next time the anti-Freedom movement makes an argument that the Second Amendment only applies to militiamen, keep this in mind.
The anti-Freedom movement is against militiamen having guns as well.
I wish they'd take the gun banners down to Guantanamo and torture them along with the terrorists.
Is, in your opinion, the USA in charge of the Swiss laws and rights?
No, but I sincerely hope that our gun rights community will run ads in Switzerland to rally Swiss patriots to defeat this monstrosity.
Walter Hinteler wrote:
When should the US invade Switzerland and capture those Swiss citizens?
We shouldn't.
I wasn't really thinking of a concrete plan on how to ship gun banners to Guantanamo. Were we really to do so, we should probably focus on capturing domestic gun banners. But if Switzerland wanted to round up their gun banners and asked if we could hold them at Guantanamo for them, I'd be willing to provide that service for them.
Walter Hinteler wrote:(sic! This report is only about the army weapons!)
I know. That's what makes it worse. It is the first time the gun banners have sought to disarm militia and not just civilians.
And I fear that the gun rights movement will not see this as a cause to defend because it isn't civilians.
It certainly shows that the gun banners shouldn't be trusted when they say they support the right of militiamen to be armed.
Walter Hinteler wrote:Btw: how many US-servicemen and reservists have their weapons at home?
None of them (though they may have their own private weapons).
And there is no militia either. This is a crime against the Constitution, which mandates that the US have a militia system much like the Swiss have.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace