Are atheists different, based on his/her family's faith?

Thomas wrote:

real life wrote:
More news from the socialist paradise

from http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2050710.ece

You've got a problem with the news?

I suppose you've completely missed the irony in:

'She doesn't want to stifle what comes naturally[/u]'

and

'children should be allowed to express their own [/u]sexuality '

followed by

'But their sexuality must also be....'

While pretending to approach the subject from a more objective point of view, the good educrat simply substitutes her own set of preferences.

Her desire that children should 'play father and mother' or 'dance naked and masturbate' should be reason enough not to send one's kids there.

0 Replies

real life wrote:

Thomas wrote:
real life wrote:
More news from the socialist paradise

from http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article2050710.ece

You've got a problem with the news?

I suppose you've completely missed the irony in:

'She doesn't want to stifle what comes naturally[/u]'

and

'children should be allowed to express their own [/u]sexuality '

followed by

'But their sexuality must also be....'

While pretending to approach the subject from a more objective point of view, the good educrat simply substitutes her own set of preferences.

Her desire that children should 'play father and mother' or 'dance naked and masturbate' should be reason enough not to send one's kids there.

I think it's a good thing that we're able to at least discuss this. The thing most people fear is that kindergartens will become a safe haven for pedophiles.

If the people who actually know what they're talking about (i.e. childrens psychologists) have established a consensus that children are capable of having a sexuality, then I don't see how this is so ironic. The main problem as I see it is that it will be hard to sort out the pedophile adults deriving pleasure from this.

Btw:

Quote:

children should 'play father and mother' or 'dance naked and masturbate'[...]

This actually happens in every kindergarten in every state in America as well. The reason kids stop this is because adults tell them their bodys are filled with sin and shame and all sexual feelings should be hidden at all costs.

0 Replies

Coolwhip wrote:

I think it's a good thing that we're able to at least discuss this. The thing most people fear is that kindergartens will become a safe haven for pedophiles.

If the people who actually know what they're talking about (i.e. childrens psychologists) have established a consensus that children are capable of having a sexuality, then I don't see how this is so ironic. The main problem as I see it is that it will be hard to sort out the pedophile adults deriving pleasure from this.

I'm not one to 'trust the experts'.

from http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53859

Quote:

The big list: Female teachers with students
Most comprehensive account on Internet of women predators on campus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: September 26, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Here is a list of the teacher 'sexpidemic' cases WND has documented where female teachers have been accused, or convicted, of assaulting students: ............

If you read the article, what follows is a list with dozens of sexual predators, masquerading as educators.

I think that school teachers, and that includes the kindergarten teacher in Norway on up, should forget about the sexuality of their students , and concentrate on teaching math, language , etc.

But modern 'educators' seem to think it's their role to guide the sexual expression of their students.

Nope. Not the way to go.

0 Replies

That list was completely irrelevant. The 'experts' I referred to were child psychologists not teachers.
I really don't see why you posted that link, nor why the link you posted consisted of female molesters exclusively.

You obviously wanted to make some kind of point to prove yourself right, in that I guess you succeded.
I can agree that teachers can be child molesters, but that is completely irrelevant in regard to the initial article you posted.

0 Replies

Coolwhip wrote:

That list was completely irrelevant. The 'experts' I referred to were child psychologists not teachers.
I really don't see why you posted that link, nor why the link you posted consisted of female molesters exclusively.

You obviously wanted to make some kind of point to prove yourself right, in that I guess you succeded.
I can agree that teachers can be child molesters, but that is completely irrelevant in regard to the initial article you posted.

The whole point is that 'educators' who are interested in 'guiding' the sexuality of their students are not to be trusted IMO.

0 Replies

real life wrote:

Coolwhip wrote:
That list was completely irrelevant. The 'experts' I referred to were child psychologists not teachers.
I really don't see why you posted that link, nor why the link you posted consisted of female molesters exclusively.

You obviously wanted to make some kind of point to prove yourself right, in that I guess you succeded.
I can agree that teachers can be child molesters, but that is completely irrelevant in regard to the initial article you posted.

The whole point is that 'educators' who are interested in 'guiding' the sexuality of their students are not to be trusted IMO.

That would include the late Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and a few of the other big heavy hitters, whom many Christians claim to be educators and teachers.

0 Replies

trust... hmm.... what about all of the religious figures that turn out to be child molesters?

0 Replies

real life wrote:

The whole point is that 'educators' who are interested in 'guiding' the sexuality of their students are not to be trusted IMO.

If that's your oppinion that just fine. But I don't see how statements like this is relevant:

Quote:

I suppose you've completely missed the irony in:

'She doesn't want to stifle what comes naturally'

and

'children should be allowed to express their own sexuality '

followed by

'But their sexuality must also be....'

I interpreted this to you saying that children can't have a sexuality and that the psychologists only say this as an excuse to molest children. Was I mistaken perhaps?

0 Replies

Are atheists different, based on his/her family's faith?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know