Shud W Threaten to Nuke Mecca, In the Event of another 9/11

or an escalating effect. they would have another good reason to wage terror against us.

you would in fact be legitimizing their way of doing things.

I have to say, it would be idiotic to use a nuke.
We can blow up mecca with conventional bombs just fine -
without all the nasty radiation fall-out.
A single B-2A can strike 80 different targets with 2000 lbs GPS guided bombs.

So if you really wanted to destroy mecca, send 4 or 5 jets.
No nukes needed.

Quote:

If a drunken Christian televangelist crashed his Cessna into your home,
David, maybe while you were out shopping for leather,

Y shopping for leather ?
I have some leather trenchcoats; is that significant ?
If so, of what ?

Quote:

I would be partly sad for you.

Well, sadness does not HELP anything.
U might as well be happy; everyone shud.
I recommend it.

Quote:

But I really like irony.

R u gonna invite the drunken Christian televangelist to YOUR home ?

Quote:

I know it's a violent thought, but not quite the definition of fascism,
as is your suggestion

That is a system of Italian socialism that has fallen from favor.
Mussolini was a life-long socialist, and known for it.
As an individualist,
I hold all forms of socialism in abhorence.

Quote:

"we" wipe out an entire group of people based on their religious beliefs.

I suggested THREATENING THE MOSLEMS.
I did not suggest launching nuclear attacks.

Quote:

It's very unamerican of you.

Maybe u just read the thread too quickly,
such as to disable your analytical processes.

Self defense is NOT unAmerican.

Quote:

" I get a bloodlust

I imagine that means he gets a lust for blood.

Quote:

when I see a slug bust

I know what a slug is ( I favor the hollowpointed kind, for stopping power ).
I wonder what a slug bust is ?

Quote:

Hit your mug with a .38 snub
And watch the blood rush"--Jedi Mind Tricks

Head shots r tricky.
Sometimes the target moves.

I don 't give a dam about Mecca.

I am complaining about W 's failure
to make dissuasive counterthreats against the Moslems
so that thay will deem it too risky to continue their attacks against us.

It will stand to our benefit if the Moslems think its too dangerous
to get us mad at them.

Quote:

Actually, you really should terrise everyone with a different opinion ,

I have never cared about Atta 's opinions,
nor Laden 's opinions, but on 9/11, I cared about their attacks.
Its not a matter of opinion,
its a MILITARY matter.

Quote:

and not only threaten to do something,
but nuke us all, for reasons of precaution.

I am not mad at u, Walter; u did not attack us on 9/11.
U r in Germany ? Right ?
I have no ill will toward, nor fear of, Germany.

Quote:

Yeah! Strike terror in their hearts!!

Good idea.

Quote:

If we don't terrorize then the terrorist win!

I don 't believe that thay have the strength to WIN
( i.e., to subject the whole world to the Moslems' religion ),
but thay can make life annoying for us,
as thay did on 9/11 ( I had a lot of trouble driving home that nite; police closed too many roads ).
Now we have to take delays getting searched at airports,
just because of the Moslems.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I don 't give a dam about Mecca.

I am complaining about W 's failure
to make dissuasive counterthreats against the Moslems
so that thay will deem it too risky to continue their attacks against us.

It will stand to our benefit if the Moslems think its too dangerous
to get us mad at them.

Quote:

I'm sure you don't give a damn about Mecca.

That shows how right u can BE

Quote:

Just like those other guys didn't give a damn about those towers in New York.

WHICH other guys ?

Quote:

But you do understand
that you weren't attacked by "the Moslems" on 9/11, don't you?

Yes, I DON 'T understand that.

Quote:

You were attacked by guys who got drunk in a strip club
before flying planes into the World Trade Center the next day...

Yeah.
I guess that shows that the club does not discriminate against fanatical Moslems.

Quote:

I somewhat doubt that threatening to nuke Mecca would deter those people.

I cannot say that it will, with full CERTAINTY,
but chances r pretty good that it 'd help,
because the Moslems CARE a lot about Mecca,
and a few other places. Thay might be afraid of getting Allah mad at them
for getting it blown into hell and too radioactive to march around.
Their religious leaders wud not like that and discourage them.

The reason for the attacks on 9/11 were 100% religious,
just as thay were however many centuries ago
when the Moslems were jumping.

The Third World War was based on economic and political philosophy.
Now, the 4th World War is based on religious philosophy.
During the 3rd World War, the commies were fanatically trying to enslave
the world under the philosophy of Marx n Ulyanov.
In the 4th World War, the Moslems r fanatically trying to enslave the world
under the philosophy of Mohammed.

W has it within his power
to tell the Moslems that we know where u live
( referring to the MOslem parts of the world ).
W has the RESPONSIBILITY to protect America from alien military threats.
W can truthfully tell them that we have the power
to make it HURT, in their religion ( because it is based so much upon geografy ).


Whether we execute the threat
will depend on how severely thay provoke us.



( I find it a little surprizing how protective the contributors of this forum r
for the delicate sensibilities of the Moslems; everyone has a right to his own opinion. )

David

I cannot say that it will, with full CERTAINTY,
but chances r pretty good that it 'd help,
because the Moslems CARE a lot about Mecca,
and a few other places. Thay might be afraid of getting Allah mad at them
for getting it blown into hell and too radioactive to march around.
Their religious leaders wud not like that and discourage them.


The reason for the attacks on 9/11 were 100% religious,

If we don't terrorize then the terrorist win!

Shud we threaten to nuke Mecca,
in the event of another 9/11 ?

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I cannot say that it will, with full CERTAINTY,
but chances r pretty good that it 'd help,
because the Moslems CARE a lot about Mecca,
and a few other places. Thay might be afraid of getting Allah mad at them
for getting it blown into hell and too radioactive to march around.
Their religious leaders wud not like that and discourage them.


The reason for the attacks on 9/11 were 100% religious,

Quote:

Okay, here's a question for you: if the 9/11 attacks were 100% religious,
why didn't the terrorists bother whether or not they would be allowed to go to heaven?

I don 't understand the question.

Quote:

Why, in fact, did they do things that would have made sure
that they won't get to Muslim heaven?

I don 't have enuf information
to speculate on their theological reasoning.

Do u DOUBT that the reason that thay gave up their lives was religious fanaticism ?

Do u have an alternative theory
as to the motivation of their mass suicide ?

David

Anyone who makes a threat he wouldn't dare carry out is a whiny little weenie.
I know that.
You know that.
They know that.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Shud we threaten to nuke Mecca,
in the event of another 9/11 ?

Not a smart thing to do.