1
   

Privacy Trees?

 
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Aug, 2007 11:27 pm
hey, reading along (not all of it)... it sounds like such a headache to me. wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to just go with a fence?


<running out quick>
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 12:37 am
Believe me Dag, there's a lot more to building a fence than it looks. I went to a seminar at home depot a few months ago and the seminar was on how to build a fence.
After seeing it in action, I realized I couldn't do it without help, so I decided to look for pre-fab fences, and I did the pricing on both the pre-fab and what my cost would be to build and the pre-fab ones ended up being cheaper than building it myself.

I did a little research on trees tonight and found that it would be much much cheaper for me to plant trees than to go with a fence. Besides, I can't even fathom the thought of painting a 100ft fence every so many years. That's just way too much work and as much as I hate to admit it, I'm not getting any younger and I already have more to do than I can really handle.

My lawn alone takes me 4 hours to cut, so the thought of painting fences just drains me!

I need a $%^&in man!

Oh, and I checked my hardiness zone and I am 4b.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 12:56 am
yeah, i can imagine that the fence wold be expensive.

then again, trees are too, and there's so much work that has to go into them every year, ongoingly...it just doesn't strike me as particularly easier or that much cheaper, especially over time.

but i'm no gardener. it just seems like a royal hassle that might not be worth it to me.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 12:58 am
That's why I'm looking for trees that don't require any maintaining ;-)
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 01:03 am
no such thing, i'm afraid.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 01:07 am
That's not what I'm told ;-)

I've never seen my cousin do anything to his trees and he planted them 3 years ago.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 01:13 am
well, when the trees are older, maybe. but there's still mulching, taking care of the soil, curing diseases.... and trimming the lawn around trees is not gonna be easier than around the fence... but it will be nicer, unless some of the trees die and have to be replaced... dunno.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 01:49 am
I've got time, so I'll do all the research and then decide.

Either way I go, it's gonna be a job.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 19 Aug, 2007 01:32 pm
I am a gardener, and a pretty tough one too. But, I would rather plant one hundred feet of fence than one hundred feet of trees.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 06:04 am
you dont have to build a tree , and then have to paint it every 3 years.

The only tree Id saty away from is the arbovitae aince they get bagworms which can denude and kill the tree I thought you were pretty set on Lelands or privet. Dont listen to city people, they dont know what the hell theyre talking about..

.

If you keep horses even briefly, theyll eat yer fences, horses like to chew on wood . My one neighbor back home has a bunch of draft horses and he will not use anything except the old style rail and post fenceing. SO hes constantly replacing rails each year as his beloved Belgian horses eat his fencing. Belgians can gnaw through cinder blocks if they want. Smaller horses are just as bad.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:20 am
Maybe if you plant one tree a week.... or have a tree-planting party, it won't be such a hassle. Would be hard to sell that one though... Maybe you can offer friends to have plaques with their names on the treest they planted.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:24 am
Went to home depot yesterday for a seminar and I went to check out what they had left of trees and I found 2 of them that fit what I'm looking for. Wish I had a pen and paper to write them down, but one was a mini,or dwarf cedar spruce (or something like that) and it even said on the tag that they are best left to grow naturally on their own. (No maintaine) :-D

I can't, for the life of me, remember what the other one was, but it looked promising :-D

My cousin planted 3 different kinds of trees in his back yard, which look really really nice, so maybe I'll plant a few different kinds.


Farmer, I hear ya on the fence thing. I gave it lots of thought and I can't imagine painting such a large fence every 3 years.

I'm glad I checked out those trees at home depot because now I know that there are trees that'll work for me.

Spruce are tough trees that can handle the rough weather conditions in these parts and I'm glad I found some that are small enough for my needs.
We are surrounded by tall spruce and I love them. I also think the smaller spruce would blend in right nice, allowing me to keep with the country/wilderness thing we've got going on.

Also, another reason why I prefer to go with trees is to give the animals a place to settle. Love my critters :-D
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:27 am
All I'd need to do around here is go to the liquor store, grab a case of beer, tell people in the store I am having a tree planting party and I'd have me a convoy Laughing
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:33 am
Farmerman - And the leylands have a variety that grows only 12 feet tall?

Montana - they'll stay small? I like the idea of planting more than one species.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:35 am
Will check it out. I decided that I'd be content with up to 20ft. This will give me a much wider selection.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:37 am
The ones I looked at get 10-15ft.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 11:42 am
how wide?
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 01:18 pm
I'd like them to have some considerable width to them, but not to the point where the tree is round. I like pointed tree, which of course is thin at the top and gets thicker going down.

I'd like them to be at least 4ft wide, up to around 7ft. Somewhere in that area. The wider the tree, the less I have to plant, but i'd rather plant more than to have stubby looking trees, so I guess it would depend on the height of the tree as well.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 01:25 pm
littlek wrote:
how wide?


Oh, you meant how wide were they Embarrassed

I think it said they were 4-6ft wide, but I looked at a bunch of them and i don't remember. I know I looked and it worked for me.

I'm headed back there this weekend and I'm gonna bring a pencil and paper with me and if they still have some left, I'll right down the info of the ones that caught my eye.

I did see some yew and I really liked them, but they're way too expensive. I won't be buying my trees there anyways because as much as I'd like too, their prices are way too high.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Aug, 2007 01:30 pm
The trees at home depot are too expensive?

Do get the info and then do more research online. The sellers of plants have a way of sometimes glossing over the bad aspects of the plants they sell.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Feline Leukemia - Contagiousness - Question by CDobyns
A big hound dog killed BBB's little Dolly dog today - Discussion by BumbleBeeBoogie
Tigers and Pigs... - Discussion by gungasnake
Fertilizer - Discussion by cjhsa
The Imaginary Garden - Discussion by dlowan
Informed Consent? - Discussion by roger
Me a cat hater? - Discussion by Craven de Kere
Dressing dogs - Question by TooFriendly112
My pussy getting weaker.. - Question by pearl123
Choosing good dog food? - Discussion by roycovin
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Privacy Trees?
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2024 at 01:51:07