OmSigDAVID wrote:Think of it this way:
if your guests have a history of becoming violent
within your home, will u, or shud u, let them back in again, knowing of the danger ?
Is that logical ?
David
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Quote:It certainly is a king of logic behind it.
In my opinion a very similar which convinced a lot of Germans
(and others) to follow some "weird" ideas (or "logics") more than 70 years ago.
I infer your reference to the Nazis.
I wish to identify myself as a supporter of ( domesticly ) weak and feeble
government, expressed in
l'aissez faire free market economics,
in political
libertarianism, individualism, and a hedonistic society.
I have always fervently believed that the well-being of society
shud subordinated to freedom of the individual.
This is inconsistent with Hitler 's socialism; he was a collectivist,
who held individualism in contempt and said so.
However, Walter,
government was
brought into existence for purposes of self defense,
after the representatives of George von Hanover were defeated and removed.
If government is not going to serve THAT function,
then we shud disassemble government and save ourselves the tax money.
I was referring to turning back Moslems at our borders,
as a measure of self defense. I did not mean that we shud
endeavor to stop them from being Moslems.
I meant that we shud stop them from entering America
for the purpose of attacking Americans, as Atta did.
I do not recommend that we invade Poland.
I don 't even support unity with Austria, tho I 've heard that thay have good desserts.
Advocating self defense is different than advocating ANY form of socialism,
including national socialism.
David
