1
   

should scientists pursue only individual interests?

Forums: Philosophy
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Neoquixote
 
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:06 am
Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 932 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:21 am
So?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:21 am
So?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:22 am
So?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:22 am
So?
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 10:22 am
If that were the case we'd see a lot more scientists working on developing better-tasting beer. A good scientist works for the betterment of humanity. If not for the sacrifice of the noble scientist we would not have progressed this far as human beings.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 12:15 pm
Quote:
Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.


ridiculous, it's a free world and people can choose their job for whatever reason they want. many people enjoy helping others by finding cures to diseases etc.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 04:36 pm
Re: should scientists pursue only individual interests?
Neoquixote wrote:
Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.


Okay, but why stop with Scholars and researchers? Why can't you say this about everyone? Or do scholars and researchers have some special status the rest of us don't?
0 Replies
 
Neoquixote
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 02:38 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
So?

？ what would you say?
0 Replies
 
Neoquixote
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 02:44 am
Re: should scientists pursue only individual interests?
extra medium wrote:
Neoquixote wrote:
Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.


Okay, but why stop with Scholars and researchers? Why can't you say this about everyone? Or do scholars and researchers have some special status the rest of us don't?

i think that means original creative works, which need relatively more inspiration by interests. maybe we can add artists into this category.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 01:18 pm
The topic of this thread, "should scientists pursue only individual interests?" makes no sense what-so-ever. Scientists have the 'freedom' to do whatever that interests them. Some arcane research may end up beneficial to humans. Some important research may end up without any scientific results - and perhaps help future scientists in their research. I'm not sure what Neo is trying to accomplish with his query.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 08:26 pm
C.I., I agree. Maybe Neo could expand on the point of this question.
By the way, Stuh, has anybody asked you about your signature quote, "If I could do it over again, I'd kill more people." Are you quoting Hitler or Stalin? Please don't tell me it's yours. Shocked
0 Replies
 
Neoquixote
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 09:15 pm
seems like i've present a not very good question. Embarrassed well, the background of this question goes like this.
i really know some guys work in scientific professions possess an intense ambition to achieve some great goals so as to benefit the society, hence they could accept some kind of fame or reward. if a scientist is motivated by such a goal, he would care more about the result of his work rather than the real demand in according with object principle in relevant field.

if one really like the research work he has chose to devote to, he can enjoy the process of the investigation which could cacuriosityuriocity, rather than care much about what the research would bring out. along such way, he could be more promising to go further.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
The Void and the Absolute Oneness of the Universe - Discussion by Relinquish
can we reconcile darkness in man with madness(lunacy) ? - Question by studentnorway
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
In the GRAND scheme of things, what matters? - Question by komr98
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
How can something come from nothing? - Question by ripple
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » should scientists pursue only individual interests?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 03:16:01
▲ ▼