Wed 29 Mar, 2006 07:21 am - Could you tell me why one would use [i]to be[/i] there, and not [i]you were[/i], so that it becomes [i]Volo meam esses[/i]? Is there like a specific grammatical rule you're following? Thanks a... (view)
Mon 27 Mar, 2006 07:55 am - Since Latin is what most people would call a "dead" language, Latin does not have a "basic vocabulary" of "must-know" words. People who study Latin usually translate... (view)
Sun 26 Mar, 2006 10:21 am - 90 degrees CCW, that's right. But I can't translate it for you. One would have to be pretty good to do so, since there's a lot of kanji in there. Japanese is almost never written... (view)
Sun 26 Mar, 2006 10:04 am - [i]Reputo, creo, provenio[/i] is fine. I would definitely not use [i]cogito[/i], seeing as it means [i]I think[/i] in the sense [i]I believe[/i]. (view)
Sat 25 Mar, 2006 02:18 pm - Thanks! I just thought of something: Isn't the 2nd pers., past tense, subjunctive of [i]to be[/i], ([i]you were[/i]), [i]esses[/i] or [i]fores[/i]? I thought [i]esse[/i] was the uninflected... (view)
