1
   

Mexico purges top police in battle against corruption

 
 
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 09:28 am
Mexico purges top police in battle against corruption
By David Usborne in New York
Published: 28 June 2007
Independent UK

Mexico has launched an unprecedented purge of its top police officers as the latest step in its increasingly high-stakes campaign to combat the drugs cartels and end a gruesome wave of narcotics-related violence.

Summarily removed from their posts, at least for the time being, are 284 federal police chiefs spread across every state of the country. Each of them will be extensively vetted for corruption and possible ties to the cartels and their ruthless gangs of enforcers.

Since taking office in December, Felipe Calderon, Mexico's President, has taken increasingly bold measures to tackle one of his country's most intractable problems - the unabated activities of the drug lords and the corruption within law enforcement that protects them from arrest.

It is a crusade that has drawn wide applause from most Mexicans, who are tired of the bloodshed spawned by the drugs trade, as well as from the United States government. However, there is so far no evidence that the assault is slowing the distribution of drugs. Nor has it quieted the violence.

Replaced for now by agents who have been extensively screened for their integrity, the suspended officers will be required to take drugs tests and undergo lie-detector tests. Their relatives and friends will be interrogated and their financial assets examined.

The death toll last year from drugs-related killings reached 2,000 and could be higher this year. Grisly discoveries in towns as far apart as Monterrey, Acapulco, Veracruz and Mexico City are reported almost daily. Beheadings of gang soldiers are commonplace. One killing was shown on a video that turned up on on the web site YouTube. Last month, a top-ranking narcotics investigations chief was gunned down in one of Mexico City's wealthiest neighbourhoods.

Corruption in the police is hardly a new problem in Mexico. It was highlighted in 2004 with the arrests of a regional intelligence director and 26 other officers in Cancun following the killings of seven people, including three federal agents.

Mr Calderon has been nothing if not relentless. He has deployed 24,000 army officers and federal agents to areas most affected by violence. Early this year, the army virtually took over law enforcement in the border city of Tijuana after all local police officers were accused of protecting the cartels.

Critics doubt whether the war can be won with so much money at stake. About 75 per cent of all the cocaine consumed in the US is smuggled through Mexico, generating up to $24bn (£12bn) in profits for the traffickers, who spend $3bn a year corrupting officials. The risks for Mr Calderon could even extend to his own safety - he has admitted to receiving death threats.

Alex Sanchez, a Mexico analyst at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs in Washington, said: "The problem is the way the cartels are structured. Taking out one guy... just leaves a vacuum that others fight to fill. There is a perpetual cycle of violence."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 398 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 05:53 pm
Good for Mr. Calderon. I wish him the greatest success.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 06:01 pm
Wrote about it, for any readers in Spanish.

Article

In a nutshell: "intelligence" knew some federal police chiefs were being bought, but did not know which ones... so they displaced everyone, and put them under investigation (they were not fired, since there was no robust evidence). The government acts like a blindman hitting all around in the hope it will blank point.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 06:08 pm
Then, are we looking at this doing more harm than good?
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 06:17 pm
It only tells you the government is honestly trying to do their best, starting over and over, cleansing and cleansing with the same formula that has helped very little, thus getting nowhere.
The growing number of executions among traffickers says that some ground has been won: gangs forced out of their habitat go to other zones and fight their space with other fiends (the Cockroach effect, we call it).
Anyway, IMO, this problem will not be solved until the US assumes a different attitude towards drugs and drug trafficking.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 06:35 pm
fbaezer wrote:
It only tells you the government is honestly trying to do their best, starting over and over, cleansing and cleansing with the same formula that has helped very little, thus getting nowhere.
The growing number of executions among traffickers says that some ground has been won: gangs forced out of their habitat go to other zones and fight their space with other fiends (the Cockroach effect, we call it).
Anyway, IMO, this problem will not be solved until the US assumes a different attitude towards drugs and drug trafficking.


Could you explain what changes you would like to see please, Fbaezer?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 07:11 pm
Agreeing with fbaezer; not holding my breath.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 08:02 pm
dlowan wrote:


Could you explain what changes you would like to see please, Fbaezer?


For Mexico.
Not only a lot of money to combat traffickers, it's not a matter of muscle only, but also a lot of citizen participation work in the communities where they thrive, so a teacher can be more respected than an enrichened thug in those communities.
And a big educational push on values, which are totally distorted by the TV duopoly, and the gossip press.

For the US.
To assume publicly that drug trafficking and consumption are local problems, not only a foreign export. To fight their local gangs. To curb arms sales to traffickers both Anglo American and Latin American (against the NRA wishes)
And to listen to the people who want some sort of legal change about drug crimes.
If soft drugs are legalized and heavily taxed, and harder drugs are made available to addicts while prosecuting the traffickers of those drugs, the problem would be easier to solve.
Of course the US has to legalize first. It's no use if we legalize and the US keeps the current policy.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 08:23 pm
Thanks for the analysis, fbaezer. Like ossobuco, then, I won't hold my breath. I'm sure you know my feelings on legalization of soft drugs, but I would support it if I thought it would do more good than harm.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Mexico purges top police in battle against corruption
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 01:20:50