1
   

China has cornered the global market for vitamins

 
 
Reply Sat 2 Jun, 2007 09:53 am
China has cornered the global market for vitamins
By Tim Johnson
McClatchy Newspapers
5/31/07

SHIJIAZHUANG, China - If you pop a vitamin C tablet in your mouth, it's a good bet it came from China. Indeed, many of the world's vitamins are now made in China.

In less than a decade, China has captured 90 percent of the U.S. market for vitamin C, driving almost everyone else out of business.

Chinese pharmaceutical companies also have taken over much of the world market in the production of antibiotics, analgesics, enzymes and primary amino acids. According to an industry group, China makes 70 percent of the world's penicillin, 50 percent of its aspirin and 35 percent of its acetaminophen (often sold under the brand name Tylenol), as well as the bulk of vitamins A, B12, C and E.

In the wake of a pet food scandal, in which adulterated wheat gluten from China led to the deaths of thousands of pets in North America, and other instances of food and toothpaste tampering, China's vitamin producers are reaching out to reassure U.S. consumers that their vitamins are safe.

Whether that's true isn't clear, however. Foreign food-safety experts say China's larger companies have reputations to protect. The question is how they maintain quality control.

In this pharmaceutical hub, a two-hour train ride south of Beijing, managers at what may be the world's largest vitamin C factory said they're constantly improving quality control to keep pace with the tenfold increase in production this decade.

"We used to only comply with domestic standards. Now we must comply with international standards," said Liu Lifeng, an aide to the general manager at the Weisheng Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

Food and drug safety inspectors drop in at the plant from time to time.

"The authorities come unexpectedly without telling us," added Tian Yumiao, the senior director of the quality control department of Weisheng.

But the inspectors aren't exactly neutral guardians of public health. They work for the city government, which is a part owner of the parent company of Weisheng Pharmaceutical. That kind of relationship between food and drug inspectors and China's booming agricultural and pharmaceutical industries is coming to the fore as an issue in the food safety debate. The local government in this thriving city of 2 million people would suffer if it did anything to hurt the growth of local vitamin and drug producers, and local officials might be reluctant to admit that a public safety issue had arisen.

"That's a conflict of interest right there," said Kathryn Boor, a food safety expert at Cornell University. "You really need a disinterested party involved in inspections."

Issues of food and drug safety ripple across China today. The former chief of the state Food and Drug Administration, Zheng Xiaoyu, was given the death sentence Tuesday for taking $832,000 in bribes to let unsafe drugs on the market. One Zheng aide was sentenced to a 15-year jail term last autumn, and a second was accused in May in the bribery scandal.

A survey earlier this year said more than three-fifths of Chinese worry about whether the food they eat is contaminated or adulterated.

Observers of China's food and dietary supplements industry say many larger companies, such as Weisheng, are well-managed and obtain key global certifications.

At the sprawling Weisheng plant, uniformed employees bustle about on neatly swept walkways, entering production areas where assembly lines purr. Machinery seemed clean, although managers barred a visitor from taking photographs in factory areas. Only minor odors emanated from a water recycling area.

"The industry in China is bifurcated between top-notch companies that are highly skilled and do all the right things, and the second- and third-tier producers, some of which are just sloppy bucket shops," said Peter Kovacs, a food industry consultant based in Incline Village, Nev.

Foreign brokers concur that the low end of China's market has severe problems.

"Sometimes you enter a factory, and you say, `I can't believe they produce food here.' It's dirty and the machines are old," said Jan Willem Roben of Vision Ingredients in Shanghai, a broker of food additives for export.

Since U.S. laws don't require food and drug sellers to label products with the country of origin of ingredients, it's impossible for consumers to know where food or supplements are coming from, not to mention what factory produced them.

Vitamins fall into an area in China that straddles the food industry, comprising some 2 million businesses that exported $2.5 billion worth of goods last year, and the drug industry, which has 5,000 companies. Cases of adulterated or mislabeled products have hit both food and drug companies.

Fake drugs to treat impotency and help with weight loss are legion in China. Some African nations complain of fake Chinese medicines hitting their pharmacy shelves. Shady small pharmaceutical firms have exported bogus anti-malaria medication to Southeast Asia, where the illness is prevalent, allowing sick people to grow sicker.

"We really believe they are criminals," said Dr. Henk Bekedam, chief of the World Health Organization office in China, referring to producers of fake medicines.

Cheap labor has given China Inc. its edge in manufacturing. But pharmaceutical laboratories, which aren't labor intensive, benefit from subsidized rates on water and energy consumption, and often-lax oversight of environmental rules.

China's entry into vitamin C involved ingenuity - and an unwitting assist from the U.S. Department of Justice. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, several big Chinese drug companies, working with the government-backed Chinese Academy of Sciences, devised a method to cut the normal five-step process for making vitamin C to a two-step fermentation process, leaving European, U.S. and Japanese firms a step behind.

The new method cut costs and gave China a manufacturing edge. It wasn't until 1997, when U.S. attorneys broke up what they said was a price-fixing cartel of European and Japanese producers, that the door swung wide open for the Chinese producers.

Firms such as Weisheng, which had planned to produce 3,000 tons of vitamin C a year, stepped up its capacity to 30,000 tons a year by mid-2004, which it claims is the largest in the world. Another company across the city, Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., has a capacity of 20,000 tons a year. Together, the two companies make nearly half of the annual world production.

"The Chinese did a good job in this. They used their existing know-how and leveraged it in a clever way," said Alexander Filz, a spokesman for DSM, a Dutch chemical, nutritional and pharmaceutical company, which is the sole competition in Europe for vitamin C production.

But then Weisheng and three other big vitamin C producers appeared to take cues from their shattered competitors. Critics say the Chinese companies practiced predatory pricing, undercutting the remaining producers, with an eye to cornering the world market and making an eventual killing.

"They formed the cartel in December 2001 when the prices were under $3 a kilogram," said William Isaacson, a Washington, D.C., attorney. Isaacson represents clients who are suing the Chinese companies in federal court in Brooklyn, N.Y., for damages from current high prices.

Today, only one Western company still makes vitamin C - Dutch-based DSM - and as China monopolizes vitamin C production, prices have hit $6 a kilogram (2.2 pounds).

Managers at Weisheng brush off the price-fixing charges, which may come to a head at a June 5 court hearing in Brooklyn, and say potential contamination of vitamin C couldn't occur under their strict quality control system.

"It's impossible," said Zhang Heming, vice director of the umbrella Shijiazhuang Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. "I've done research on this pet food case."

"Our procedures, our facilities, even our air conditioners and water supply all comply with international standards," said Tian, the quality control department director.

An assistant brought in a pile of certificates showing the company had met stringent European and British quality standards, and said U.S. standards are similar.

Chinese food safety experts bristle at what they say is the West's exaggerated response to the pet food scare, in which melamine, a toxic chemical used in plastics, was added to wheat gluten, and the general "food fright" swirling around Chinese exports.

He Jiguo, a food safety expert at China Agriculture University, said it's difficult to deter companies with criminal or fraudulent intent before a mishap is reported.

"There are thousands of illegal things you can add to a product. The supervisory authorities can't literally test for each one of them," He said. "It is only after an accident happens that one finds out, just as a police officer can't arrest a thief before he commits a crime."

One Dutch expert said European and U.S. companies are reaping the benefits as Chinese companies reel from the fallout from food safety worries.

"There is an interest in the farm lobby in Europe and the United States to exaggerate. Everybody is always very happy when there's poor quality coming from the competition," said M.A. Keyzer, the director at the Centre for World Food Studies in Amsterdam.

Early reports indicate that Chinese food exporters already are experiencing a drop in sales.

Boor, the Cornell expert, said concerns about the safety of the global food trade are a useful wake-up call to U.S. consumers.

"I think we take an awful lot for granted here in the U.S. that people are doing their jobs all along the food chain," Boor said.
-------------------------------------------------------

McClatchy special correspondent Fan Linjun contributed to this report.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 415 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jun, 2007 09:57 am
dietary supplements receive little oversight
Despite suspect safety, dietary supplements receive little oversight
By Tony Pugh
McClatchy Newspapers
5/31/07

WASHINGTON - The $22 billion dietary supplement industry operates with minimal oversight from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, despite a history of suspect quality and safety - and independent lab tests that have found one in four products to be substandard.

About one in four dietary supplements tested don't meet quality or safety standards, according to former FDA research scientist William Obermeyer, a co-founder of the independent testing firm, ConsumerLab.com, which tests thousands of supplement products.

Some are tainted with pesticides, salmonella, glass, bacteria or heavy metals such as lead and cadmium. Others fail for a variety of reasons, including a lack of ingredients, improper ingredients, failure to disintegrate properly and mislabeling.

Because manufacturers seek low-cost ingredients, Obermeyer said it's a safe bet that some of the tainted products contain ingredients from China, which typically are cheaper.

Under a 1994 federal law, most dietary supplements - vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids and other substances such as enzymes and metabolites, which are taken orally and intended to augment the diet - don't need to be registered or approved by the FDA.

FDA inspections have found supplement manufacturing plants with pest infestations, defective equipment and pipes that leak liquid onto products.

"There's no question the vitamin supplement area is as susceptible, if not more, to this type of adulteration," said ConsumerLab President Tod Cooperman.

But after more than 10 years of development, the FDA still hasn't set minimum standards for the safe manufacture of dietary supplements. Instead, manufacturers set their own standards.

Because supplements are classified as food, they aren't regulated by the same strict guidelines that govern drugs. Supplement manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that their products are safe and include all the ingredients listed on the package label.

And like food manufacturers, supplement makers don't have to record, review or provide the FDA with reported injuries or illnesses that result from their products. Reporting is voluntary, although information typically is provided willingly.

If safety, health or mislabeling problems develop, the FDA can restrict or remove a supplement from the market. Drugs, on the other hand, must be deemed safe and effective before they can be prescribed or sold.

China's emergence as a leading ingredient supplier for the supplement industry has raised new fears since a recent pet food scare was traced to adulterated Chinese wheat gluten. Earlier this year, a shipment of bacteria-contaminated vitamin A from China also was flagged before it could be added to infant formula in Europe. And the FDA will start testing toothpaste imported from China after a poisonous ingredient used in antifreeze was found in Chinese-made toothpaste in Panama.

Record requirements allow officials to track ingredients to the country and plant where they were manufactured.

Supplement companies are urged to buy quality ingredients from reputable firms, whatever country they're in, said Judy Blatman, a spokeswoman for the Council for Responsible Nutrition, which represents supplement manufacturers and suppliers.

"Quality has to be the number one priority for ingredient suppliers and manufacturers," Blatman said. "We need to have high-quality products in order to maintain consumer confidence in them."

That confidence was shaken in 2004, when the FDA banned the sale of dietary supplements containing ephedra, which caused tremors and heart palpitations and was cited as a factor in numerous deaths.

In February 1997, the FDA proposed mandatory rules outlining "good manufacturing practices" for the safe production of dietary supplements. But more than 10 years later, those rules still haven't been finalized.

The FDA rulemaking process, concerns by consumers and industry groups and revisions sought by the White House Office of Management and Budget have slowed the process.

The proposed rules, first published in 2003, called for supplements and ingredients to be tested for purity, quality, composition and strength during the manufacturing process and when the final batches are completed.

They'd apply to domestic and foreign firms that make, package or hold dietary supplements and ingredients that are distributed in the U.S. The proposal requires that manufacturers hire qualified employees and supervisors and design plants that protect supplements against adulteration during their manufacture, packaging and storage.

The guidelines also would require manufacturers to keep records of consumer quality complaints for three years beyond the date of manufacture.

In public comments, supplement makers argued that the proposals would cost the industry some $245 million a year, more than 10 times the FDA estimate. FDA spokeswoman Kimberly Rawlings would say only that the guidelines would be issued very soon.

Because the original proposal has gone through several revisions, it's unclear how much of the 2003 draft will be included in the final version. Rawlings, however, said that the new guidelines "should increase consumer confidence in the quality of dietary supplements."

The original proposal questioned the effectiveness of supplier-provided "certificates of analysis" in verifying the purity and safety of supplement ingredients. But the guidelines didn't disallow their use.

The certificates, which are included in shipments of raw materials used by supplement manufacturers, vouch for the authenticity and quality of the ingredients being shipped.

Obermeyer said the documents aren't always genuine. Sometimes the ingredients haven't been tested or the certificates have included forged results for tests that weren't performed, he said.

Blatman, however, said the certificates should suffice if they come from a preferred ingredient supplier with whom the manufacturer has a longstanding relationship. She said implementing the new FDA rules is her organization's top regulatory priority. The group also favors additional FDA funding to enforce the new regulations.
-------------------------------------------------------

For more information about the safety of dietary supplements, go to ConsumerLab.com.

To find out more about the FDA's proposed guidelines, go to:
www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00876.html
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jun, 2007 10:20 am
Toxic Toothpaste Made in China Is Found in U.S.
Toxic Toothpaste Made in China Is Found in U.S.
Alex Quesada for The New York Times
By WALT BOGDANICH
Published: June 2, 2007

The Food and Drug Administration confiscated tubes of tainted Chinese-made toothpaste on Friday at a Dollar Plus store in Miami.

Consumers were advised yesterday to discard all toothpaste made in China after federal health officials said they found Chinese-made toothpaste containing a poison used in some antifreeze in three locations: Miami, the Port of Los Angeles and Puerto Rico.

Although there are no reports of anyone being harmed by the toothpaste, the Food and Drug Administration warned that the Chinese products had a "low but meaningful risk of toxicity and injury" to children and people with kidney or liver disease.

The United States is the seventh country to find tainted Chinese toothpaste within its borders in recent weeks.

Agency officials said they found toothpaste containing a small amount of diethylene glycol, a sweet, syrupy poison, at a Dollar Plus retail store in Miami, sold under the brand name ShiR Fresh Mint Fluoride Paste. The F.D.A. also identified nine other brands of Chinese toothpaste that contain diethylene glycol, some with concentrations of 3 percent to 4 percent.

Previously, only a few brands had been identified by health officials around the world as containing diethylene glycol and all of them listed the chemical on the label.

But diethylene glycol was not listed on the label of the toothpaste found in the Miami store. Its presence was detected only because the F.D.A. began testing imported Chinese toothpaste last month. That precaution was prompted by the discovery in Latin America of tens of thousands of tubes of tainted toothpaste made in China.

Over the years, counterfeiters have found it profitable to substitute diethylene glycol for its chemical cousin, glycerin, which is usually more expensive. Glycerin is a safe additive commonly found in food, drugs and household products. In toothpaste, glycerin is used as a thickening agent.

Chinese regulators said Thursday that their investigation of toothpaste manufacturers there had found they had done nothing wrong. Chinese officials also said that while small amounts of diethylene glycol could be safely used in toothpaste, new controls would be imposed on its use in toothpaste.

The F.D.A. said diethylene glycol in any amount was not suitable for use in toothpaste.

The agency said two Chinese companies, Goldcredit International Trading and the Suzhou City Jinmao Daily Chemicals Company, made the tainted brands found in the United States.

In a statement yesterday, federal health officials called diethylene-glycol poisoning "an important public safety issue." The Panamanian government last year inadvertently mixed the poison made in China into 260,000 bottles of cold medicine, killing at least 100 people, prosecutors there said.

In that case, Chinese regulators acknowledged on Thursday that two companies in China had "engaged in some misconduct" in the way they labeled and sold the diethylene glycol, but they said a Panamanian importer bore most of the blame.

Last month, after publicity over the poisoning deaths from the cold medicine, a consumer in Panama noticed that toothpaste in a store listed diethylene glycol as an ingredient and notified the authorities. Eventually it was traced to China, and since then countries around the world have been on the lookout for the product.

In addition to the United States and Panama, tainted toothpaste has been found in Australia, the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, Honduras and Nicaragua.

Chinese exports of toothpaste to the United States account for $3.3 million out of a $2 billion-dollar market in America, F.D.A. officials said. "The scope of this is fairly small when you look at all the toothpaste that is consumed in the U.S.," Doug Arbesfeld, an agency spokesman, said.

The agency said Chinese-made brands with diethylene glycol were typically sold at low-cost, "bargain" retail outlets. A man answering the phone at the Dollar Plus store in Miami, identified by federal officials as selling the Chinese toothpaste, said he did not want to be interviewed because his English was poor. The man, who did not give his name, said federal inspectors came to his store yesterday.

Mr. Arbesfeld said that six tubes were confiscated there and that several more were found at the store's distributor. Those tubes were destroyed. F.D.A. officials also said they had confiscated several brands of toothpaste at the Port of Los Angeles and at a retail store in Puerto Rico.

The agency said toothpaste containing diethylene glycol was sold under the names Cooldent Fluoride, Cooldent Spearmint, Cooldent ICE, Dr. Cool, Superdent, Clean Rite, Oralmax Extreme, Oral Bright, Bright Max, and ShiR Fresh Mint.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jun, 2007 12:20 pm
??????

FDA has advised us to toss any toothpaste made in China due to contamination by something verry similar to antifreeze. They turn out cat food that kills cats. Why would we be buying vitamins from them?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jun, 2007 12:58 pm
Roger
roger wrote:
??????

FDA has advised us to toss any toothpaste made in China due to contamination by something verry similar to antifreeze. They turn out cat food that kills cats. Why would we be buying vitamins from them?


Because it is cheap?

Glad you're feeling well enough to post ole friend.

BBB
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » China has cornered the global market for vitamins
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 11:32:11