1
   

Before King Arthur and Aragorn....

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jul, 2003 04:04 pm
I have the "ultimate" Chaucer - the Robinson edition - but it is at work - I can look up the line in the Prologue.

Chaucer's English is earlier than Spencer's - I suspect the "prick" in Chaucer means to prick, as with a prickle - to goad - this, they are pricked by nature to begin their spring singing (prolly to attract mates, or scare other nesting birds away).
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jul, 2003 05:07 pm
As i noted in another thread, the East Anglia brand of 14th century English, as used by Chaucer and Wycliffe, became the ancestor of standard english: Chaucer's works were extensively published by William Caxton, and Wycliffe's translation of the bible was standard in English for more than two centuries, when King James commissioned a new translation.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jul, 2003 09:19 pm
I did well in school with Chaucer, Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Cressida...now Anglo-Saxon I had trouble with, too Germanic...
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Jul, 2003 09:39 pm
In bygone years, when i was at university, i learned to read Anglo-Saxon without a gloss or concordance. I doubt that i still could. I'm still able to read middle english without the gloss, however.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Poims - Favrits - Discussion by edgarblythe
Poetry Wanted: Seasons of a2k. - Discussion by tsarstepan
Night Blooms - Discussion by qwertyportne
It floated there..... - Discussion by Letty
Allen Ginsberg - Discussion by edgarblythe
"Alone" by Edgar Allan Poe - Discussion by Gouki
I'm looking for a poem by Hughes Mearns - Discussion by unluckystar
Spontaneous Poems - Discussion by edgarblythe
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 11:11:11