1
   

What do you think?

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 05:13 am
What do you think?

Mammals evolved on this planet about 200 million years ago. One type of mammal, the hominid, began using audible signals to convey meaning about 4 million years ago. Language, as we comprehend that word, began much less than 4 million years ago.

What is thought? The dictionary gives us various definitions of thought; I would guess that it is accurate to say that the actions of neural networks that control our sensorimotor actions can be regarded as thought. In other words, such things as memory, control of movements, and processing of sense inputs are all a process of thinking. Thinking produces thoughts. Thinking goes on all the time even while we sleep.

I guess that we will agree that all mammals had to have the ability to think. This leads to the conclusion that thinking was been happening on this planet at least 200 million years before human language existed on this planet.

Those individuals who accept the science of evolution must then conclude that humans may think in linguistic forms some small percentage of the time but that most thought is not in linguistic form.What does all this mean to you? It means that most of the things that you think are true about thinking are pure non-sense. This also applies to many of the things we all believe that are based upon the philosophical attitudes that fills our life are like wise pure non-sense.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 653 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 07:50 am
I think the fact that you got no response on the "Hypography Science Forum" to this question prompted you to post it here some hours later.

Your question is ill prepared. Do some reading on the strong and weak forms of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, and the Santiago Theory of Cognition, and then decide if the question was worth asking.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 10:12 pm
well since i spend most of my time between thoughts that is hard to describe.

here goes.

<clap>

hey fresco!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 10:32 pm
<nothing programmatic>
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 10:43 pm
Well, there is touch, sight, hearing, taste, smell and thought.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 10:55 pm
Gelisgesti wrote:
Well, there is touch, sight, hearing, taste, smell and thought.


My sight has long been a mess, but functioning in daylight; my hearing has been in tharn for about twenty years, at the least, constant tinnitus; I never had much of a sense of smell, some kind of hereditary anosmia; but, hey, I can taste, despite what people say about the nature of taste buds, and think, on occasion; and, touch is good.

I'd really like not to be lectured in some robotic fashion.
At the same time, I gleem that coberst can't break out of the robotics.
I somewhat understand, but am sorry about it.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 11:01 pm
I keep trying to think but nothing is happening!
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 11:01 pm
Oh, yeah, I didn't read the question, past a few sentences... no patience for robotry. Have the odd need to speak up once in a while.


In the meantime, maybe I'm a display against his pov, re thinking and sense. Of course, who knows.
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 02:01 am
This is certainly an articulate group.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 07:24 am
Hey kuvasz !!

Maybe you and I should "educate" coberst with a discussion of "Man the Three Brained Being" as outlined by the big G. He might then have some fun allocating his "95% of thoughts" to the "other two brains". :wink:
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 10:45 am
fresco wrote:
Hey kuvasz !!

Maybe you and I should "educate" coberst with a discussion of "Man the Three Brained Being" as outlined by the big G. He might then have some fun allocating his "95% of thoughts" to the "other two brains". :wink:


greetings, fresco

as i read through the discussion it all appears likely that one has to start somewhere, so the seminal discusion ought to be "what was the first idea?"

(which is where we came in six years ago)

from there it all falls out vis-a-vis cogition

coberst, fresco and i refer to gurdjieff, he is awfully dense but insightful, in a mystic sort of way, observing your remarks on this site lend one who has read him to suggest you do the same.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What do you think?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 08:00:20