1
   

Infants have a richer Xual* life than adults

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Sun 8 Apr, 2007 01:30 pm
Infants have a richer Xual* life than adults.



Xual instinct is the energy or desire that drives the human pursuit of pleasure. This is meant to include all organs of the human body whereby the individual finds pleasure or encounters pain. The pattern of normal adult Xuality, love between man and woman, is merely a specific organization of a general energy biologically generated in all humans.

Human Xual organization and his or her social organization are deeply connected; it is assumed that both organizations have evolved simultaneously. Parenthood, the prolonged maintenance of children, represents the important aspect of the ape to human transition that binds these two organizations. Family organization is the nucleus of all social organization is an accepted axiom Freud has built into his matrix of theories.

Adult Xuality, "in so far as it is restricted by rules designed to maintain the institution of the family and in so far as the desire for Xual satisfaction is diverted and exploited for the purpose of maintaining a socially useful institution, is a clear instance of the subordination of the pleasure-principle to the reality-principle which is repression; as such it is rejected by the unconscious essence of the human being and therefore leads to neurosis."

Prolonged dependency of the human infant has far-reaching consequence. This prolonged infancy creates two major consequences: a subjective omnipotent indulgence in pleasure free from the confines of reality and on the other hand, and an objective powerless dependence on others. These conflicting forces constitute a trauma from which the child become adult never recovers psychologically. This conflict between actual impotence and desires for omnipotence is a basic theme throughout history.

Infants have a Xual life and adults have a Xual life but both are much different. For the infant this energy is directed at all aspects of the body while the adult has narrowed this energy thrust almost totally upon the genital activity. The infantile Xuality pattern evolves into the adult Xuality pattern. Therein we can see why Freud took this path for defining the infant pleasure-principle as he did because it provides an explanation for the adult pleasure-principle and shows both wherein there is constant conflict with the reality-principle. The adult Xual pattern, which is a perversion of infancy, is a well organized tyranny. Children explore indiscriminately all erotic potentialities of the human body; by adult standards this is a perversion and by the same token judged by infantile standards adult Xual behavior is a perversion.

Questions for discussion
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 392 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Shapeless
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Apr, 2007 04:08 pm
Re: Infants have a richer Xual* life than adults
coberst wrote:
Do you think, as I do, that Freud's use of the s-word has made his thoughts repulsive to many fastidious people?


Possibly, but often the rejection of Freud has more to do with more specific things like the refusal to accept his chauvinistic framework. It's hard to take seriously the claim that all women secretly desire to have penises, for example.

As a few people pointed out on one of your previous threads, Freudian theory has also been resisted on the grounds that it is largely tautological. Popper gave the most resounding utterance of this viewpoint; as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy summarizes it:

Quote:
That is to say, [Popper] saw that what is apparently the chief source of strength of psychoanalysis, and the principal basis on which its claim to scientific status is grounded, viz. its capability to accommodate, and explain, every possible form of human behaviour, is in fact a critical weakness, for it entails that it is not, and could not be, genuinely predictive. Psychoanalytic theories by their nature are insufficiently precise to have negative implications, and so are immunised from experiential falsification.


An extensive review of Freud-refutations can be found here.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Apr, 2007 04:47 pm
coberst asked:
Quote:


In a word, no.

Joe(words are words.)Nation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Infants have a richer Xual* life than adults
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.87 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 04:13:34