1
   

TRILLIONS of Dollars in Loan Defaults?

 
 
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:07 am
It is possible there will be trillions in default in home loans over the next year or so.

2 Trillion Dollars worth of home loans that are ARM will be exploding beyond their affordable levels this year alone. Most will be several thousand per month higher than they originally signed for on their contracts, a great majority are going in default. Many signed on for the adjustable rate to kick in after 5 years, and others on 3 year adjustables, when there was extremely low interest. The non prudent sheeple have been taken again for a ride, as most of these 2 trillion are in default, and there is no relief in sight. Read a local news story below. - michael1


http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/real_estate/article/0, 1299,DRMN_414_4695955,00.html

By John Rebchook, Rocky Mountain News
May 13, 2006
Thousands of Denver homeowners gambled on adjustable rate mortgage loans three years ago.

Now those bets are coming up short. These homeowners are facing the hard truth that their ARM mortgage payments are going up several hundred dollars more each month as their rates adjust skyward.

The higher payments are expected to cost many homeowners in the metro area tens of millions of dollars in higher mortgage payments and drive up the already near-record number of foreclosures.

"In a sense, they were really playing Russian roulette," said Ed Jalowsky, owner of Classic Advantage Realty in Denver.

"Russian roulette is a form of gambling, and that's what they were doing - they were gambling."

An estimated $2 trillion in home loans nationwide is expected to adjust upward in 2006 and 2007, according to Moody's Economy.com, a research firm based in West Chester, Pa.

The Denver area may be hit particularly hard because homeowners in Colorado on average have little equity in their homes.

In Colorado, 28.5 percent of homeowners have 5 percent or less equity in their homes, and 47 percent have 15 percent or less equity, according to a report released earlier this year by Christopher L. Cagan, director of research and analytics at First American Real Estate Solutions in Santa Ana, Calif.

Only Tennessee homeowners, on average, have less equity in their homes, the report said.

This lack of equity is one of the driving forces behind the rising Denver-area foreclosure rate, according to many experts.

This year is on track to eclipse 2005 as the second worst ever for foreclosures. Last year, more than 14,000 Denver-area homeowners defaulted on mortgages.

Increasingly, people who locked in three-year ARMs with rates in the 4 percent range are finding loan rates rising by 50 percent or more.

Next, the downward spiral begins: They can't afford the higher payment, they can't sell their homes for a profit, or they can't refinance because they have little or no equity in their houses or they're precluded from refinancing because of pre-payment penalties.

"People were still riding the euphoria of the late '90s (three years ago), when they thought housing prices were just going to keep going up quickly." So they locked in adjustable rate mortgages that had fixed below-market rates for three, five and seven years, Jalowsky said.

Jalowsky estimates that 75 percent to 80 percent of homeowners defaulting on their mortgages in the Denver area took out ARMs in recent years.

Jalowsky is listing a home for one client who is going to see his monthly mortgage payment rise by $1,000 on June 1, when his ARM adjusts.

Brian Bartlett, of RE/MAX Southeast, agrees.

"It is absolutely mortgage roulette," Bartlett said. "Either buyers were not informed by the mortgage broker or all they chose to hear was the answer to the following question: What is my initial monthly payment? When you combine ARMs, 100 percent financing, negative amortization, seller-paid closing costs, rising rates, falling prices, rising inventory and a continuing sluggish Denver economy, you have a recipe for 1987 to 1990 revisited."

That's when the local housing market crashed.

Keith Gumbinger, vice president of New Jersey-based HSH Associates, which tracks mortgage rates around the country, said a typical borrower who took out a three-year ARM in 2003 at 4.18 percent could see that loan rise to 6.18 percent this year and 7.625 percent next year.

The first bump would drive up the monthly principal and interest on a $240,000 loan by $296, to $1,467, a 25 percent jump.

And next year, they could see their monthly payment rise to $1,699, a $528 increase from the initial amount, a 45 percent increase.

Even worse, thousands of homeowners chose so-called "option ARMs," which gives consumers the choice of making minimum payments, minimum payments with interest, or payments with interest and principal.

They can choose whether to amortize the loans on a 15-year or 30-year basis. Sometimes the rates change every month.

If you only make the minimum payment, the interest you don't pay is added to your loan amount. That is called "negative amortization," which means the loan can actually grow with every payment.

"The option ARM is the temptress," said Pete Lansing, owner of locally based Universal Lending.

He wasn't a big fan of option ARMs two years ago, when they were popular, and he lost business to other companies that pushed them.

Now, he said, he is getting phone calls from people who want to refinance out of option ARMs into fixed-rate mortgages.

"Usually, they're pretty short conversations, because they can't do it because of stiff pre-payment penalties," Lansing said.

Now, people are wondering why they didn't lock in fixed rates at 40-year lows around 5.5 percent.

"One of the issues I hear over and over again from the people is that they now feel really stupid," Lansing said.

But it's not entirely doom and gloom for the Denver housing market.

Dan Jester, a spokesman for Moody's Economy.com, said the Denver area is in decent shape because it didn't see the huge run-up in prices that other areas have seen, so it's unlikely to experience the big crashes that could occur on the coasts.

"If you were Orange County, (Calif.), I'd be a lot more concerned," Jester said.

First American Real Estate Solutions' Cagan, in a 32-page report issued in February, said that 7.7 million borrowers took out $1.88 trillion in ARMs in 2004 and 2005.

Cagan describes $368.3 billion of that amount as "loans with equity difficulty" that are at risk of going into default.

"Some of these homeowners will be able to find help from increased income, from tightening their lifestyle, or from relatives or close friends," Cagan writes in the report.

Also, some people will be able to renegotiate terms with their lender "to avoid a default and foreclosure - which is painful and costly to the lender as well as the homeowners."

Cagan also doesn't think the hangover from people overindulging in low-rate ARMs will bring the economy to its knees.

He said that if $110 billion in homeowner equity is lost over the next few years, that would only account for about 1 percent of the $11 trillion of home equity in the U.S., and the economy would be able to absorb the loss.

Still, that's little comfort if you're facing the prospect of rising rates.

Lou Barnes, principal of Boulder West Financial Services, said he already is getting calls from people who bought ARMs that had rates fixed for three or five years between 2002 and 2004.

While some of them can keep the low rates until 2008, they're already worried.

The question he hears: "Do I swap my low rates for a 6.75 percent, fixed-rate loan today and pony up the extra dollars, or do I hold on to the low rate until the last minute, knowing that there's a good chance that rates will be even higher when the rates reset?"

"The straight answer is that the interest rate forecast is so murky, there isn't any way to know what to do," Barnes said.

However, he added, "The longer you plan to be in your house, abandoning what you have today and getting into a fixed-rate loan as quickly as you can probably makes sense."

For rates to come down, you have to be betting that the economic recovery will reverse and slump, he said.

"But all of the data is showing the economy is just smoking," he said, which probably means more interest rate increases as the Fed looks to slow inflation.

Lansing, of Universal Lending, said it is too harsh to say homeowners who took out risky ARMs several years ago were playing Russian roulette.

Rather, he said many of the borrowers had been lulled by years of low or falling rates and probably didn't fully understand the risks.

But now they aren't seeing their income rise by as much as they thought, or they are getting divorced or dealing with an unexpected illness, making it more difficult to deal with a bigger mortgage payment, he said.

"Life happens," Lansing said. "Now they are paying the piper."

[email protected] or 303-892-5207
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 867 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 06:35 am
This has been covered several times on CNN and MSNBC over the past couple of weeks. It is a serious issue that has at least been getting some coverage.

In the last two weeks, at least 6 homes around me have gone up for sale. Not sure it's loan/ARM related, but it's a significant change in the speed in which these homes were selling 6 months ago. Last Fall, the same homes were selling faster than they could be built, and no re-sell sat for more than a week.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Mar, 2007 08:40 am
The fallout is already arriving as sub prime mortgage companies are going under. I heard just yesterday that based on the current rate of new home sales it would take 8 months to sell the existing new homes that builders have right now. If that is true then builders are going to be hit hard. They can't afford that many homes on their hands for that long and they won't keep building if they can't sell what they have.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2007 08:54 am
Agencies failed to rein in subprime lending
Posted on Tue, Apr. 24, 2007
Agencies failed to rein in subprime lending
By Kevin G. Hall
McClatchy Newspapers
A who's who of mortgage-industry regulators

WASHINGTON - Anyone looking to point a finger of blame for the meltdown in the subprime mortgage market may need more than two hands. It took the action, and the inaction, of many players to produce today's mess, which threatens to slow the U.S. economy further.

"Everyone has a share in the blame - lenders, borrowers, regulators, investors. There were a lot of mistakes, and everyone made them," said Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, a consultancy in West Chester, Pa.

The federal government arguably failed most of all. It shirked its responsibility to regulate this critical area of home finance - much as it had during the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s. At least nine federal agencies oversee some portion of the mortgage market, and over the past three years nearly all of them issued warnings about risky loan terms.

But not one of them - or Congress - moved to regulate non-bank lenders and mortgage brokers. Both fall through the cracks of direct federal regulation. Together, they originate more than half of all "subprime" loans to borrowers with weak credit histories, according to the Federal Reserve. They also account for 80 percent of the adjustable-rate, subprime mortgages that are the heart of today's problems.

Why didn't regulators act more forcefully?

When times are good, regulators are wary of taking away the punch bowl. During the housing boom of 2001-2005, President Bush talked up soaring home sales to tout his vision of an "ownership society."

Home sales buoyed an economy that was rocked by the dot-com bust, but regulators knew that problems were brewing in the subprime mortgage market, much as they had in the earlier S&L crisis. Still, they watched as the sector slowly crumbled into financial disaster because it was something of a sideshow. The main imperative was to keep the economy growing.

"We knew there was excessive use of adjustable (mortgage) rates. That was a time when the Fed had interest rates very low, for good macroeconomic reason, but it made everyone vulnerable to this problem" that we have today, said Edward Gramlich, a Federal Reserve governor from 1997 to 2005 and the author of the forthcoming book "Subprime Mortgages: America's Latest Boom and Bust."

With lending rates low and home prices soaring in 2004 and 2005, many borrowers took on heavy risks, some gambling that home prices would keep climbing and that interest rates would remain low.

But in June 2004, the Fed began 17 consecutive quarter-point interest rate increases over two years, bringing its benchmark rate up to the current 5.25 percent from 1 percent. For many consumers, adjustable rates rose, and borrowers saw their monthly mortgage payments jump by 30 percent or more.

Today, about 14 percent of subprime loans are delinquent. Industry research shows that another 2 million adjustable-rate loans will reset this year and next, which could cause delinquency and foreclosure rates to soar.

Concerns about the subprime market and bad weather combined in March to spark the biggest monthly drop in existing home sales in 18 years. The National Association of Realtors said Tuesday that March sales slumped 8.4 percent over February figures.

Subprime loans make up 15 percent of the mortgage market, which limits their damage to the broader economy. But similar mortgage delinquency problems also are emerging among borrowers with better credit. Nervous lenders are tightening credit defensively, further delaying the recovery of the moribund housing market.

During the housing boom, global investment banks such as Merrill Lynch and HSBC snapped up non-bank lenders such as First Franklin Financial Corp. and Household International, large mortgage-issuing finance companies that specialized in the subprime market. They weren't subject to federal banking supervision, either.

These non-bank lenders and mortgage brokers began issuing large numbers of risky and exotic adjustable-rate loans with low teaser rates, as well as so-called "liar loans," which asked borrowers their income but rarely verified it.

Federal regulators did little but issue warnings.

Since 2003, the federal regulators that oversee banks, savings and loans institutions and credit unions all warned about loose lending standards and risky loans. The regulators include the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., the Treasury Department's Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision.

But none of them suggested that they be granted powers to regulate mortgage brokers, which today are subject only to a patchwork of state regulations and no national licensing or standards. Nor did anyone seek to regulate non-bank lenders, which increasingly are bankrolled by Wall Street. That left plenty of room for predatory lending and looser standards.

In short, there was a gaping hole in the regulatory net, but no one tried to mend it. Not the regulators. Not the Bush administration. Not the Congress.

Today, as defaults rise, major subprime lenders such as New Century Financial, the second largest unregulated non-bank lender, are racing each other into bankruptcy. At least 21 non-bank lenders have filed for bankruptcy protection or shut down since early last year. And the stocks of investment banks with large subprime holdings, such as Merrill Lynch and HSBC, are taking a hit as mortgage defaults and foreclosures climb.

"It's hard to blame the regulators for most of this, because these guys like New Century and other outfits in trouble are unregulated," said Robert Litan, an expert on federal regulation at the Brookings Institution, a liberal think tank in Washington.

Former Federal Reserve Governor Gramlich rejects some Democrats' criticism that former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan failed to issue strong enough warnings about new exotic loans that were designed to get more Americans into the Republicans' "ownership society".

"We have a structural flaw in the system, and lenders and borrowers took advantage of this, and people got whacked," Gramlich said. He blamed Congress, which the Republicans controlled until January. "Most of the fixes are, and have been all along, measures that could only be changed by legislation."

The Republican-led Congress didn't much believe in federal regulation. It believed in free markets, and there was big money in subprime loans.

Questionable lending flourished in part because unregulated lenders resell risky loans to the secondary mortgage market. The loans are bundled together for sale as bonds, called mortgage-backed securities. The process - called securitization - helped many Americans get into their first homes. But where there were weak lending standards, it pushed the problems farther up the investment chain.

Traditionally, this bundling of loans for sale was done by two congressionally mandated public corporations - the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan and Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac).

That started changing in 2003. By 2005, so-called private-label mortgage-backed securities - those offered by private entities - surpassed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as the top issuers of these debt instruments.

The ultra-wealthy, private equity firms and hedge funds - unregulated pools of capital - snapped up the mortgage bonds because some had returns more than 10 times higher than Treasury bills. Last year, the subprime mortgage bonds market exceeded $540 billion, according to Bear Stearns, the largest packager of these bonds.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are both regulated by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, but there's no regulation of private-label issuances. They're subject only to the general disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, like any corporation issuing stock or corporate bonds.

The Congress had no appetite for regulating them, either. Senate Republicans last year quashed a bipartisan measure that had passed the House of Representatives overwhelmingly. It would've empowered the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to compete for loans to the same population sought by subprime lenders. GOP senators thought the growing subprime market could better serve those lower- and middle-income people.

At an April 17 House Financial Services Committee hearing into the mortgage industry's problems, Assistant Housing and Urban Development Secretary Brian D. Montgomery reminded lawmakers that he'd warned them in May 2005 that a stronger FHA could keep many Americans out of troubling subprime mortgages.

"The rise in subprime foreclosures is far from a surprise to most people in this room," Montgomery said.

Now that the boom is over, some mortgage brokers welcome the call for regulation.

"I don't think there is enough scrutiny of our world," admitted Kristofer Webb, a mortgage broker in Annapolis, Md. He said he was shocked by the amount of abusive lending to uneducated borrowers during the housing boom. "It's very simple for a broker to back clients into a corner where they don't see any way out."

If you have a subprime mortgage that you can't afford, there is some help available. The Federal Reserve has directed banks and other lenders to work with homeowners to avoid foreclosure. If your lender is not being helpful in restructuring your loan, here are some other options.

- Contact the Federal Housing Administration. It keeps a list of non-profit counseling agencies that provide advice before and after you purchase a home. The FHA is trying to help holders of subprime mortgages refinance into fixed-year FHA loans.

For more on qualifying requirements, go to the FHA Resource Center at www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/fharesourcectr.cfm.

The FHA has set up a customer helpline for individuals seeking to refinance their subprime mortgages: 1-800-CALL-FHA. Also, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency offers this hotline: 1-800-613-6743.

- The Federal Home Loan and Mortgage Corp., or Freddie Mac, announced it will purchase an additional $20 billion in fixed rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages to assist lenders restructure loans held by sub-prime borrowers. Freddie Mac's program will be ready by mid-summer. Call 1-800-Freddie and follow the prompts to get to a customer service representative.

- The Federal National Mortgage Association also has a hotline to help consumers - 1-800-7Fannie. A customer service representative can direct your call to a specialist.

- If your mortgage was issued by a traditional bank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s consumer hotline is 1-877-275-3342.

The FHA has set up a customer helpline. Individuals seeking to refinance their subprime mortgages can call 1.800.CALL.FHA. Also, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency offers this hotline: 1.800.613.6743.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Leveraged Loan - Discussion by gollum
Web Site - Discussion by gollum
Corporate Fraud - Discussion by gollum
Enron Scandal - Discussion by gollum
Buying From Own Pension Fund - Discussion by gollum
iPhones - Question by gollum
Paycheck Protection Plan - Question by gollum
Dog Sniffing Electronics - Question by gollum
SIM CARD - SimTraveler - Question by gollum
Physical Bitcoin - Question by gollum
 
  1. Forums
  2. » TRILLIONS of Dollars in Loan Defaults?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 11:15:07