1
   

rarely seen among Buddhists in america

 
 
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:45 pm
with some major exceptions such as JLNobody, we find under the eight fold path the ethical conduct includes;
Quote:
Buddha explained right speech as follows: 1. to abstain from false speech, especially not to tell deliberate lies and not to speak deceitfully, 2. to abstain from slanderous speech and not to use words maliciously against others, 3. to abstain from harsh words that offend or hurt others, and 4. to abstain from idle chatter that lacks purpose or depth. Positively phrased, this means to tell the truth, to speak friendly, warm, and gently and to talk only when necessary.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,303 • Replies: 59
No top replies

 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:31 pm
Fine then. I'll be the first idiot to talk. Filler filler filler.

I've read. I've read it at least a few hundred times. I've discussed it. I've thought about it when I am nattering and pained by the ignorance of my own little brain and of the world.

And I'm not a Buddhist. And I'm not in America - - at least according to a large group of "Americans" of the "United" states of whatever.

Maybe consider pasting it on every cellphone.

With complimentary right action pamphlets for those who will be subjected to their presence in public places, or while doing business with them.

Point made clearly enough?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 06:34 pm
Re: rarely seen among Buddhists in america
dyslexia wrote:
with some major exceptions such as JLNobody, we find under the eight fold path the ethical conduct includes;
Quote:
Buddha explained right speech as follows: 1. to abstain from false speech, especially not to tell deliberate lies and not to speak deceitfully, 2. to abstain from slanderous speech and not to use words maliciously against others, 3. to abstain from harsh words that offend or hurt others, and 4. to abstain from idle chatter that lacks purpose or depth. Positively phrased, this means to tell the truth, to speak friendly, warm, and gently and to talk only when necessary.


rarely seen among ANYONE with any consistency.....
0 Replies
 
cello
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 07:14 pm
Do you know so many Buddhists, dyslexia?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 07:14 pm
cello wrote:
Do you know so many Buddhists, dyslexia?

Actually, yes.
0 Replies
 
cello
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 07:15 pm
In this forum or in real life? And how many?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 07:41 pm
Remember, dys, you are personally responsible for them.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 07:36 am
cello wrote:
Do you know so many Buddhists, dyslexia?

1,873 or perhaps 3, I'm not sure. Does it matter to you?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 07:48 am
One, I know personally as well: he's just now in a cage behind dys, awakened from the "sleep of ignorance" a long time ago ... :wink:
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 08:32 am
Dys
I only know two Budhists really well. Neither of them practice the speech ethics Dys described.

BBB
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 08:40 am
dyslexia wrote:
cello wrote:
Do you know so many Buddhists, dyslexia?

1,873 or perhaps 3, I'm not sure. Does it matter to you?


<snork!>
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 08:53 am
dyslexia wrote:
cello wrote:
Do you know so many Buddhists, dyslexia?

Actually, yes.


Do you read any Buddhist publications?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 08:54 am
Quote:
to talk only when necessary


Isn't that a sign commonly seen on a New York subway?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 09:00 am
I belong to a Buddhist peace fellowship and it seems to me that American Buddhists are just like Christians, Jews, and Muslims in many respects.

(I'm not a Buddhist. )
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 09:07 am
dyslexia wrote:
1,873 or perhaps 3, I'm not sure. Does it matter to you?


LOL
0 Replies
 
cello
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 09:48 am
Of course, it matters. "1,873 or perhaps 3, I'm not sure" is a far cry from the generalized "Buddhists in america".

Now that I know where you are coming from, I can have a better perspective of your statement.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 12:11 pm
cello wrote:
Of course, it matters. "1,873 or perhaps 3, I'm not sure" is a far cry from the generalized "Buddhists in america".

Now that I know where you are coming from, I can have a better perspective of your statement.

Somehow I doubt it.
0 Replies
 
cello
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 01:35 pm
No comment.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Mar, 2007 10:30 am
cello wrote:
No comment.


Ditto
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Mar, 2007 10:46 am
Two people who live in our building:
1)the Representative of the Dominican Republic to the United Nations

2) A Buddhist monk.


Joe(one of them never says "Hello" to me in the elevator.)Nation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » rarely seen among Buddhists in america
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 01:55:36