@Ionus,
What is so ridiculous Io is that such things as--
Quote:EDGAR 1, ----SPENDI 0.
and similar assertions--grant others the right to respond in kind and then all communication has ceased which is then uncontestable scientific evidence that socialising with evolutionists is pointless unless socialising means incoherent jabbering. And that was the point under discussion with Ed.
That anti-evolutionists have an argument with evolutionists regarding the impossibility of social interaction with them. (see Dawkins calling an opponent "lower than an earthworm".) And that their company is worth taking pains to avoid.
When evolutionists are responded to in the manner they have encouraged, but with much more wit, style and verve, they immediately throw up their arms like a regretful, deflowered damsel and beseech onlookers to pity their forlorn state with handwringings and pitiful squealings and yelpings.
It's pathetic. And it's been going on for years. I can't even explain it to them such is the state their socialisation has left them in.
One can but live in hope that witnesses are saved from the same horrible fate as to be unable to be tolerated in pubs.
When you say interesting do you mean baffling ? By comparison to what i have been called, if you are calling them names, feel free to call me names any day. You were elucid and eloquent as one would expect of an educated gentleman talking about poetry to peasants, especially english poetry to american peasants. 
