i've been looking at the website of Marshall Hall, sen. Bridges' ghostwriter. either a crackpot of the highest order, or a sage for the ages. before i get to that, while trying to check out his claims, i came across a fascinating scientific anomaly: NGC 7603, a galaxy that is apparently connected by a "filament" to a companion object of vastly different redshift. it's been touted for decades, mainly by astronomer Halton Arp, as evidence against the Big Bang, but apparently new photographs reveal there are actually four objects involved, rather than the original two. you can look at the manuscript here:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0203/0203466.pdf
and now, out of all the verbage at fixedearth.com, here's one claim that caught my eye:
Quote: Note these seven assumptions required by the Helio Model that enables it to account for the precise phenomena required in Solar Eclipses:
1) The Sun must cease its observed daily spiral orbit pattern around the Earth and become stationary relevant to the Earth and the Moon. We must assume that what everyone who has ever lived has seen with their own eyes--the Sun rising in the East and setting in the West--is not truly what is happening. Rather what no one has ever seen--a stationary Sun--is what we are told is scientific truth.
http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VII.htm
unfortunately, Mr. Hall doesn't provide any context for this claim. anyone care to enlighten me? (incidentally, he used the word relevant when he meant relative, unless i'm missing some esoteric meaning.
)
hbg
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace