1
   

Nonviolence and Rationality

 
 
Mark W
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Feb, 2007 05:10 am
yes, I do refuse to buy cheap Chinese goods.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Feb, 2007 12:52 am
Mark W wrote:
yes, but we do not aspire to have the "morality" of the rest of the animal kingdom. Do you think that we should? We are gifted with the potential to reach for higher levels of justice. By higher levels I mean a justice, morality, or ethics, that would provide the greatest welfare for all, "weak" as well as "strong", old as well as young, and it would even provide the greatest welfare for misguided individuals who act violently and so would help to reform them (as we also have this potential).


There's an implication here that other animals never act to protect other, weaker members of their species. This is not true.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Feb, 2007 01:39 am
Mark, your initial premise may be accurate on the micro, but it is demonstrably faulty on the macro. Is this coincidence?

http://www.benbest.com/lifeext/execute.jpg
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.88 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 04:12:05