1
   

The Problem: Freedom in Nature

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Sun 28 Jan, 2007 08:18 am
Rather, humans are not just atoms but are self-energized creatures who can mold there own destiny by becoming partners with the natural environment and not mere passive slaves.



Dewey restated Kant's conclusion with the observation "cosmos examined by a speck of cosmos"; Dewey declared that "truth is two-faced". He concluded that it is reality "as discovered by man" and is not reality "in-itself". Truth is the result of human groping and knowing; "it is always on the make".

Pragmatic wo/man judges truth in only the practical manner, if the knowledge is meaningful and useful to men and women in their voyage then it is true (until proven to be false). Pragmatism points out that there are geometrical, mathematical, and logical truths but these are arrived at within a closed system unrelated to action. Such truths are absolute by definition within their closed domain and are not arrived at in the scope of human action. Such truths are not matters of fact and human search is for matters of fact upon which to base human action. Action itself is the main determining factor for truth in practical matters.

Rather, humans are not just atoms but are self-energized creatures who can mold there own destiny by becoming partners with the natural environment and not mere passive slaves. This seems to me to be the heart of the matter to which Becker is drawing our attention. Becker finds that wo/man is entirely too passive in accepting what appears on the surface of reality. We fail to mold our destiny in light of our nature and thereby we too easily accept what is formed for us by those who use us for their interest. We are the bull constantly focusing upon the cape rather than the reality behind the moving cape. We must find a means to energize our self sufficiently to take control of our destiny.

Ideas and quotes from "Beyond Alienation" by Ernest Becker
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 350 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Jan, 2007 05:09 pm
Coberst

Buddhism is one way to do what you suggest. I am familiar with all the things you write about, but from a "mystical" point of view. These thoughts were old long before Kant and that lot were ever concieved. Oriental philosophy in general takes these things you say into consideration to a larger extent that western philosophy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Problem: Freedom in Nature
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 07:01:01