1
   

Wo/man cannot evolve beyond his/her character

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Tue 16 Jan, 2007 07:53 am
Character is the network of habits that permeate all the intentional acts of an individual.

I am not using the word habit in the way we often do, as a technical ability existing apart from our wishes. These habits are an intimate and fundamental part of our selves. They are representations of our will. They rule our will, working in a coordinated way they dominate our way of acting. These habits are the results of repeated, intelligently controlled, actions.

Habits also control the formation of ideas as well as physical actions. We cannot perform a correct action or a correct idea without having already formed correct habits. "Reason pure of all influence from prior habit is a fiction." "The medium of habit filters all material that reaches our perception and thought." "Immediate, seemingly instinctive, feeling of the direction and end of various lines of behavior is in reality the feeling of habits working below direct consciousness." "Habit means special sensitiveness or accessibility to certain classes of stimuli, standing predilections and aversions, rather than bare recurrence of specific acts. It means will."

Britannica specifies that attitude is "a predisposition to classify objects and events and to react to them with some degree of evaluative consistency."

If I consult my inner self I cannot focus upon an attitude but can infer such an attitude based on behavior. If I wish to become conscious of my intuition I can through observation of behavior describe the attitude, which, in turn, allows me to ascertain the nature of my intuition.

When a mother tells her son "you must change your attitude". The son cannot change the attitude directly but the son must change his intuition from which the inferred attitude emanates. This does become a bit convoluted but in essence when we wish to change an attitude we are saying that our intuition must be modified. We can modify intuition only through habit directed by our will.

"Were it not for the continued operation of all habits in every act, no such thing as character would exist. There would be simply a bundle, an untied bundle at that, of isolated acts. Character is the interpenetrating of habits. If each habit in an insulated compartment and operated without affecting or being affected by others, character would not exist. That is conduct would lack unity being only juxtaposition of disconnected reactions to separated situations. But since environments overlap, since situations are continuous and those remote from one another contain like elements, a continuous modification of habits by one another is constantly going on."

My understanding of character and the quotations concerning the nature of character are taken from "Habits and Will" by John Dewey

http://www.alexandercenter.com/jd/johndeweyhabits.html.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 443 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Jan, 2007 10:06 am
Makes sense, except this part: "The son cannot change the attitude directly but the son must change his intuition from which the inferred attitude emanates.....We can modify intuition only through habit directed by our will."

It's an oxymoron.
0 Replies
 
stuh505
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Jan, 2007 11:59 pm
I feel like your albatross. Every time I reply to one of your (many) threads it just dies.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jan, 2007 01:54 am
Becjer appears to be making a long winded analysis of the nurture side of the well known nature versus nurture debate. Wttgenstein might be seen as a more interesting advocate of this side which is essentially the antithesis of aspirants to "the potentential spirituality of man" ( the most comprehensive of these perhaps being Krishnamurti).
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Jan, 2007 07:51 am
stuh

I've wondered at times wether cob is really interested in debates. As he states it, he is on a mission to educate humanity one post at a time. Maybe he's a teacher of the old school. Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Wo/man cannot evolve beyond his/her character
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 12:31:47